The co-production of value in digital, university-industry R&D collaborative projects

被引:61
|
作者
Canhoto, Ana Isabel [1 ]
Quinton, Sarah [1 ]
Jackson, Paul [1 ]
Dibb, Sally [2 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Wheatley Campus, Oxford OX2 7BB, England
[2] Open Univ, Open Univ Business Sch, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
关键词
Value co-creation; Value proposition co-production; University-industry collaboration; Knowledge exchange; Digital research; R&D collaboration; VALUE CO-CREATION; SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; CONTEXT; GENERATION; INTERVIEW; EXCHANGE; IMPACT; BRIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the context of R&D collaborations between universities and industry, this study investigates the co-production process and the contextual elements that shape it. We develop a conceptual framework that builds on the service dominant logic perspective that value propositions emerge from the interaction between co-producing parties and the integration of resources. Specifically, the framework explicates how individual, organizational, and external factors shape the type of interactions and the platforms used, the availability and use of operand and operant resources, and the organizational and individual outcomes sought in R&D collaborative projects. We investigate the interplay among these factors through group interviews with UK industry practitioners and university researchers in the context of digital research projects. The types of interaction, resources, and outcomes sought that characterize successful R&D collaboration are revealed, and the contextual aspects that enable, facilitate, block, or create barriers to successful R&D collaborations are identified. Finally, we propose five practical principles for the successful development of collaborative R&D projects within the university-industry context. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 96
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] University-Industry R&D Collaboration in Korea's National Innovation System
    Lee, Kong-Rae
    [J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [42] Measuring the impacts of university-industry R&D collaborations: a systematic literature review
    Cohen, Maria
    Fernandes, Gabriela
    Godinho, Pedro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2024,
  • [43] Framework for Alliance Capabilities: A Study in Malaysian University-Industry R&D Alliances
    Asmawi, A.
    Kamaruzaman, N.
    Chew, K. W.
    Othman, N. S.
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 94 - 98
  • [44] A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia
    Mannak, Remco S.
    Meeus, Marius T. H.
    Raab, Jorg
    Smit, Alexander C.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (09)
  • [45] Research on the R&D Status of Advanced Composites Material Industry by University-Industry Collaboration in China
    Tang, Xiao-Jun
    Zhu, Xu-Sheng
    Yin, Peng-Bo
    Hui, Tian-Li
    Yang, Feng-Long
    [J]. MECHANICS AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2018, : 648 - 658
  • [46] University-industry collaboration and university technology license: the moderating effects of market and R&D strength
    Zhao, Xiaojuan
    Li-Ying, Jason
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (10) : 3115 - 3127
  • [47] Managing autonomy in university-industry research: a case of collaborative Ph.D. projects in the Netherlands
    Zalewska-Kurek, Kasia
    Harms, Rainer
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 14 (02) : 393 - 416
  • [48] Does Collaboration Matter: The Effect of University-industry R&D Collaboration On Economic Growth
    Togoontumur, Tamir
    Cooray, N. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (02) : 9482 - 9496
  • [49] Collaborative R&D and European industry
    vanderMeer, W
    Trommelen, G
    Vleggaar, J
    Vriezen, P
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1996, 39 (05) : 15 - 18
  • [50] On the value of flexibility in R&D projects
    Santiago, LP
    Vakili, P
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (08) : 1206 - 1218