Statistical Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference

被引:11
|
作者
Qin, Xin [1 ]
Xian, Yuan [1 ]
Zutshi, Aditya [2 ]
Fan, Chuchu [3 ]
Deshmukh, Jyotirmoy, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Galois Inc, Portland, OR USA
[3] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CHECKING; ROBUSTNESS;
D O I
10.1109/ICCPS54341.2022.00017
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Uncertainty in safety-critical cyber-physical systems can be modeled using a finite number of parameters or input signals. Given a system specification in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), we would like to verify that for all (infinite) values of the model parameters/input signals, the system satisfies its specification. Unfortunately, this problem is undecidable in general. Statistical model checking (SMC) offers a solution by providing guarantees on the correctness of CPS models by statistically reasoning on model simulations. We propose a new approach for statistical verification of CPS models for userprovided distribution on the model parameters. Our technique uses model simulations to learn surrogate models, and uses conformal inference to provide probabilistic guarantees on the satisfaction of a given STL property. Additionally, we can provide prediction intervals containing the quantitative satisfaction values of the given STL property for any user-specified confidence level. We also propose a refinement procedure based on Gaussian Process (GP)-based surrogate models for obtaining fine-grained probabilistic guarantees over sub-regions in the parameter space. This in turn enables the CPS designer to choose assured validity domains in the parameter space for safety-critical applications. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our technique on several CPS models.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 126
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robustness Analysis of Cyber-Physical systems based on Discrete Timed Cyber-Physical Models
    Hsieh, Fu-Shiung
    2021 IEEE WORLD AI IOT CONGRESS (AIIOT), 2021, : 250 - 254
  • [32] IsaVODEs: Interactive Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems at Scale
    Huerta y Munive, Jonathan Julián
    Foster, Simon
    Gleirscher, Mario
    Struth, Georg
    Pardillo Laursen, Christian
    Hickman, Thomas
    Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2024, 68 (04)
  • [33] Research on safety verification technology of cyber-physical systems
    Tuo, Ming Fu
    Zhou, Xing She
    An, Li
    Zhu, Rui
    COMPUTING, CONTROL, INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ENGINEERING, 2015, : 525 - 528
  • [34] Special issue: Formal verification of cyber-physical systems
    Geretti, Luca
    Abate, Alessandro
    Nuzzo, Pierluigi
    Villa, Tiziano
    INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 289
  • [35] Simulation alternatives for the verification of networked cyber-physical systems
    Lora, Michele
    Muradore, Riccardo
    Quaglia, Davide
    Fummi, Franco
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2015, 39 (08) : 843 - 853
  • [36] Modeling and verification of temporal properties in Cyber-Physical Systems
    Graja, Imen
    Kallel, Slim
    Guermouche, Nawal
    Kacem, Ahmed Hadj
    2017 14TH IEEE ANNUAL CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS & NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC), 2017, : 325 - 330
  • [37] Skill-Based Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems
    Knuppel, Alexander
    Jatzkowski, Inga
    Nolte, Marcus
    Thum, Thomas
    Runge, Tobias
    Schaefer, Ina
    FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (FASE 2020), 2020, 12076 : 203 - 223
  • [38] Statistical Model Checking of Cyber-Physical Systems Using Hybrid Theatre
    Nigro, Libero
    Sciammarella, Paolo F.
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, 2020, 1037 : 1232 - 1251
  • [39] On Attacker Models and Profiles for Cyber-Physical Systems
    Rocchetto, Marco
    Tippenhauer, Nils Ole
    COMPUTER SECURITY - ESORICS 2016, PT II, 2016, 9879 : 427 - 449
  • [40] Multicore Models of Communication for Cyber-Physical Systems
    Schoeberl, Martin
    CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: MODEL-BASED DESIGN, CYPHY 2019, 2020, 11971 : 28 - 43