Biomass from agriculture in small-scale combined heat and power plants - A comparative life cycle assessment

被引:101
|
作者
Kimming, M. [1 ]
Sundberg, C. [1 ]
Nordberg, A. [2 ]
Baky, A. [2 ]
Bernesson, S. [1 ]
Noren, O. [2 ]
Hansson, P-A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Inst Agr & Environm Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2011年 / 35卷 / 04期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Biogas; Gasification; Willows; Green manure; CHP; LCA; ORGANIC FARMS; SYSTEMS; BALANCES; STORAGE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.027
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Biomass produced on farm land is a renewable fuel that can prove suitable for small-scale combined heat and power (CHP) plants in rural areas. However, it can still be questioned if biomass-based energy generation is a good environmental choice with regards to the impact on greenhouse gas emissions, and if there are negative consequences of using of agricultural land for other purposes than food production. In this study, a simplified life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted over four scenarios for supply of the entire demand of power and heat of a rural village. Three of the scenarios are based on utilization of biomass in 100 kW (e) combined heat and power (CHP) systems and the fourth is based on fossil fuel in a large-scale plant. The biomass systems analyzed were based on 1) biogas production with ley as substrate and the biogas combusted in a microturbine, 2) gasification of willow chips and the product gas combusted in an IC-engine and 3) combustion of willow chips for a Stirling engine. The two first scenarios also require a straw boiler. The results show that the biomass-based scenarios reduce greenhouse gas emissions considerably compared to the scenario based on fossil fuel, but have higher acidifying emissions. Scenario 1 has by far the best performance with respect to global warming potential and the advantage of utilizing a byproduct and thus not occupying extra land. Scenario 2 and 3 require less primary energy and less fossil energy input than 1, but set-aside land for willow production must be available. The low electric efficiency of scenario 3 makes it an unsuitable option. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1581
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] A Comprehensive Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of the Use of Hydrochar Pellets in Combined Heat and Power Plants
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Venkatesh, G.
    Sandberg, Maria
    Eskandari, Samieh
    Joseph, Stephen
    Granstrom, Karin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) : 1 - 15
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste
    Mezzullo, William G.
    McManus, Marcelle C.
    Hammond, Geoff P.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 657 - 664
  • [25] Experimental prototype development and performance analysis of a small-scale combined cycle for energy generation from biomass
    Amirante, R.
    De Palma, P.
    Distaso, E.
    La Scala, M.
    Tamburrano, P.
    ATI 2017 - 72ND CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, 2017, 126 : 659 - 666
  • [26] A techno-economic analysis of small-scale, biomass-fuelled combined heat and power for community housing
    Wood, S. R.
    Rowley, P. N.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (09): : 3849 - 3858
  • [27] A barrier and techno-economic analysis of small-scale bCHP (biomass combined heat and power) schemes in the UK
    Wright, Daniel G.
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    Brammer, John
    ENERGY, 2014, 71 : 332 - 345
  • [28] THE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS-APPROACH TO SMALL-SCALE COMBINED HEAT AND POWER
    REAY, DA
    JOURNAL OF HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS, 1984, 4 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [29] Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Zero Emission Combined Cycle Power Plants
    Ataei, A.
    Iranmanesh, A.
    Rashidi, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 6 (03) : 801 - 814