Epistemic uncertainty quantification via uncertainty theory in the reliability evaluation of a system with failure Trigger effect

被引:13
|
作者
Chen, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shumin [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Rui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Reliabil & Syst Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sci & Technol Reliabil & Environm Engn Lab, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Dependent failure process; Trigger effect; Model epistemic uncertainty; Uncertainty process; Belief adjustment factors approach; DEGRADATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107896
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Reliability evaluation of system with dependent failure processes is a problem that draws more research attention. It is essential to quantify the epistemic uncertainty in the system for high evaluation accuracy. Trigger is one of the typical dependent failure processes. Trigger effect indicates that some events occur because of the trigger of other events. This paper studies the epistemic uncertainties in the reliability evaluation of the system with trigger effect based on uncertainty theory. The model-form uncertainty of physics of failure (PoF) model, the failure process uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and the propagation of them in the system are quantified with Belief Adjustment Factors Method (BAFM) and the Liu process. System belief reliability is evaluated by decoupling the correlations between the trigger failure mechanism and triggered failure mechanisms. A conductive slip ring in electromechanical orientation device is introduced as a case. The trigger effect and system belief reliability are analyzed. Results show that, compared with probability method, evaluation values with uncertainty method are more conservative and stable in the case.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Sensor Placement Based on System Reliability Criterion Under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Duan, Rongxing
    Lin, Yanni
    Feng, Tao
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 57061 - 57072
  • [42] Anxiety as an "epistemic'' emotion: An uncertainty theory of anxiety
    Miceli, M
    Castelfranchi, C
    [J]. ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2005, 18 (04): : 291 - 319
  • [43] A novel evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method for structures with epistemic uncertainty
    Jiang, C.
    Zhang, Z.
    Han, X.
    Liu, J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2013, 129 : 1 - 12
  • [44] An effective evidence theory-based reliability analysis algorithm for structures with epistemic uncertainty
    Wang W.
    Xue H.
    Gao H.
    [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2021, 37 (02) : 841 - 855
  • [45] Epistemic Uncertainty in Reliability-Based Design Optimization
    Zhuang, Xiaotian
    Pan, Rong
    [J]. 2012 PROCEEDINGS - ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2012,
  • [46] Hybrid uncertainty quantification of dependent competing failure process with chance theory
    Chen, Ying
    Wang, Yanfang
    Li, Shumin
    Kang, Rui
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
  • [47] Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Automatic Test System via Fuzzy Similarity Theory
    Wu, Shilin
    Zhang, Qi
    Huang, Zhiping
    [J]. 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 1656 - 1660
  • [48] Reliability Evaluation of an Imprecise Multistate System With Mixed Uncertainty
    Yang, Lechang
    Wang, Chenxing
    Ling, Chunyan
    Xie, Min
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2024, 73 (01) : 478 - 491
  • [49] Mission reliability evaluation and selective maintenance approach for manufacturing systems considering epistemic uncertainty
    Cai, Yuqi
    Guo, Hanjun
    He, Yihai
    Shi, Rui
    Xing, Yihua
    Qi, Yuxin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2024,
  • [50] Uncertainty quantification in system identification
    Au, S. K.
    Zhang, F. L.
    [J]. LIFE-CYCLE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 1072 - 1076