Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective

被引:34
|
作者
Cooper, Shelly R. [1 ]
Jackson, Joshua J. [1 ]
Barch, Deanna M. [1 ]
Braver, Todd S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Psychol & Brain Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Latent variable; Structural equation modeling; Psychometrics; Human connectome project; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; FMRI RELIABILITY; BRAIN NETWORKS; NIH TOOLBOX; TASK; ORGANIZATION; CONNECTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Neuroimaging data is being increasingly utilized to address questions of individual difference. When examined with task-related fMRI (t-fMRI), individual differences are typically investigated via correlations between the BOLD activation signal at every voxel and a particular behavioral measure. This can be problematic because: 1) correlational designs require evaluation of t-fMRI psychometric properties, yet these are not well understood; and 2) bivariate correlations are severely limited in modeling the complexities of brain-behavior relationships. Analytic tools from psychometric theory such as latent variable modeling (e.g., structural equation modeling) can help simultaneously address both concerns. This review explores the advantages gained from integrating psychometric theory and methods with cognitive neuroscience for the assessment and interpretation of individual differences. The first section provides background on classic and modem psychometric theories and analytics. The second section details current approaches to t-fMRI individual difference analyses and their psychometric limitations. The last section uses data from the Human Connectome Project to provide illustrative examples of how t-fMRI individual differences research can benefit by utilizing latent variable models.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 46
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Latent Variable Perspective of Copula Modeling
    George, Edward I.
    Jensen, Shane T.
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2011, 30 (01) : 22 - 24
  • [2] Individual differences in false recall: A latent variable analysis
    Unsworth, Nash
    Brewer, Gene A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 62 (01) : 19 - 34
  • [3] Individual Differences in Lapses of Attention: A Latent Variable Analysis
    Unsworth, Nash
    Robison, Matthew K.
    Miller, Ashley L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2021, 150 (07) : 1303 - 1331
  • [4] Latent variable mixture models in research on learning and individual differences
    McMullen, Jake
    Hickendorff, Marian
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 66 : 1 - 3
  • [5] Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging
    Scheinost, Dustin
    Noble, Stephanie
    Horien, Corey
    Greene, Abigail S.
    Lake, Evelyn M. R.
    Salehi, Mehraveh
    Gao, Siyuan
    Shen, Xilin
    O'Connor, David
    Barron, Daniel S.
    Yip, Sarah W.
    Rosenberg, Monica D.
    Constable, R. Todd
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 193 : 35 - 45
  • [6] Latent Variable Modeling of Differences and Changes with Longitudinal Data
    McArdle, John J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 : 577 - 605
  • [7] General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation
    Muthen, BO
    Curran, PJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 2 (04) : 371 - 402
  • [8] Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach
    Okada, Brooke M.
    Slevc, L. Robert
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2018, 46 (07) : 1076 - 1092
  • [9] Individual Differences in Intelligence and Working Memory: A Review of Latent Variable Models
    Conway, Andrew R. A.
    Kovacs, Kristof
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, VOL 58, 2013, 58 : 233 - 270
  • [10] Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach
    Brooke M. Okada
    L. Robert Slevc
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2018, 46 : 1076 - 1092