The oral health assessment tool - Validity and reliability

被引:289
|
作者
Chalmers, JM [1 ]
King, PL
Spencer, AJ
Wright, FAC
Carter, KD
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
nursing facilities; geriatric dentistry; assessment tool; older adults;
D O I
10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00360.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) was a component of the Best Practice Oral Health Model for Australian Residential Care study. The OHAT provided institutional carers with a simple, eight category screening tool to assess residents' oral health, including those with dementia. This analysis presents OHAT reliability and validity results. Methods: A convenience sample of 21 residential care facilities (RCFs) in urban and rural Victoria, NSW and South Australia used the OHAT at baseline, three-months and six-months to assess intra- and inter-carer reliability and concurrent validity. Results: Four hundred and fifty five residents completed all study phases. Intra-carer reliability for OHAT categories: percent agreement ranged from 74.4 per cent for oral cleanliness, to 93.9 per cent for dental pain; Kappa statistics were in moderate range (0.51-0.60) for lips, saliva, oral cleanliness, and for all other categories in range of 0.61-0.80 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.05). Inter-carer reliability for OHAT categories: percent agreement ranged from 72.6 per cent for oral cleanliness to 92.6 per cent for dental pain; Kappa statistics were in moderate range (0.48-0.60) for lips, tongue, gums, saliva, oral cleanliness, and for all other categories in range of 0.61-0.80 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients for OHAT total scores were 0.78 for intra-carer and 0.74 for inter-carer reliability. Validity analyses of the OHAT categories and examination findings showed complete agreement for the lips category, with the natural teeth, dentures, and tongue categories having high significant correlations and percent agreements. The gums category had significant moderate correlation and percent agreement. Non-significant and low correlations and percent agreements were evident for the saliva, oral cleanliness and dental pain categories. Conclusion: The Oral Health Assessment Tool was evaluated as being a reliable and valid screening assessment tool for use in residential care facilities, including those with cognitively impaired residents.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Prospective Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Live Donor Assessment Tool
    Iacoviello, Brian M.
    Shenoy, Akhil
    Hunt, Julia
    Filipovic-Jewell, Zorica
    Haydel, Brandy
    Rudow, Dianne LaPointe
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2017, 58 (05) : 519 - 526
  • [22] Validity and reliability of a simple categorical tool for the assessment of interceptive skill
    Muller, Sean
    Abernethy, Bruce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2008, 11 (06) : 549 - 552
  • [23] Validity and Reliability Evidence of the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment Tool
    Canney, Nathan E.
    Bielefeldt, Angela R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 105 (03) : 452 - 477
  • [24] Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence
    Walsh, Catharine M.
    Ling, Simon C.
    Khanna, Nitin
    Grover, Samir C.
    Yu, Jeffrey J.
    Cooper, Mary Anne
    Yong, Elaine
    Nguyen, Geoffrey C.
    May, Gary
    Walters, Thomas D.
    Reznick, Richard
    Rabeneck, Linda
    Carnahan, Heather
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (06) : 1417 - +
  • [25] Reliability and validity of the Alcohol Marketing Assessment Rating Tool (AMART)
    Noel, Jonathan K.
    Babor, Thomas F.
    Robaina, Katherine
    [J]. NORDIC STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, 2018, 35 (02) : 108 - 117
  • [26] Validity and Reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)
    Belafsky, Peter C.
    Mouadeb, Debbie A.
    Rees, Catherine J.
    Pryor, Jan C.
    Postma, Gregory N.
    Allen, Jacqueline
    Leonard, Rebecca J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 117 (12): : 919 - 924
  • [27] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool
    Tomita, Aya
    Tahara-Sasagawa, Emi
    Yonezawa, Kaori
    Usui, Yuriko
    Haruna, Megumi
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2023, 121
  • [28] CANCER SYMPTOMS ASSESSMENT: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A NEWLY DEVELOPED TOOL
    McMillan, Susan
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2014, 41 (02) : E85 - E86
  • [29] Establishing the Validity and Reliability Evidence of Preceptor Assessment of Student Tool
    Zhou, Lili
    Almutairi, Abdulaali R.
    Alsaid, Nimer S.
    Warholak, Terri L.
    Cooley, Janet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 81 (08) : 10 - 20
  • [30] The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
    Huang, Anyan
    Wu, Kusheng
    Li, Anna
    Zhang, Xuanzhi
    Lin, Yuhang
    Huang, Yanhong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (10)