Song structure and repertoire sharing in the Tawny Pipit Anthus campestris in Poland

被引:8
|
作者
Osiejuk, Tomasz S. [1 ]
Grzybek, Jerzy [1 ]
Tryjanowski, Piotr [1 ]
机构
[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Dept Behav Ecol, PL-61714 Poznan, Poland
关键词
Tawny Pipit; Anthus campestris; song structure; song rate; repertoire sharing; small repertoire size;
D O I
10.3161/068.042.0210
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The present study characterizes the song of Tawny Pipit males (n = 55) recorded in May 2005 in the Wielkopolska region of Poland. Tawny Pipits sang with a very variable rate of 4-28 songs per minute (mean +/- SE 16.0 +/- 1.35). Songs were thus short, with an average duration of under 0.5 sec. At the same time, songs were relatively complex in structure and consisted of 2-3 (max. 5) units of frequency between 2.7 and 5.3 kHz. Based on visual inspection of sonograms and further cross-correlation analysis, 20 different song types were distinguished. Each male had only a single song type in his repertoire and the rendition of strophes produced by a male were very stereotypical. The songs of different males exhibited varying levels of similarity, from completely different, through sharing some within-song units, to strongly similar on sonograms. However, even the strongly similar songs of different males demonstrated some individuality in frequency parameters or fine note structure. On average, there were only 0.38 different song types per male within the population studied, and 83% of males sang song types shared with at least one other male. Nine of the 20 song types described were unique, i.e. sung by single males. The results of this study suggest that a highly variable song rate may be a signal of male motivation, whereas individual differences in song structure probably enable individual recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Guess who? Evaluating individual acoustic monitoring for males and females of the Tawny Pipit, a migratory passerine bird with a simple song
    Onate-Casado, Javier
    Portes, Michal
    Beran, Vaclav
    Petrusek, Adam
    Petruskova, Tereza
    JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2023, 164 (04) : 845 - 858
  • [22] Guess who? Evaluating individual acoustic monitoring for males and females of the Tawny Pipit, a migratory passerine bird with a simple song
    Javier Oñate-Casado
    Michal Porteš
    Václav Beran
    Adam Petrusek
    Tereza Petrusková
    Journal of Ornithology, 2023, 164 : 845 - 858
  • [23] Territory tenure in song sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbours, but not to repertoire size
    Beecher, MD
    Campbell, SE
    Nordby, JC
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 59 : 29 - 37
  • [24] Song parameters, repertoire size and song sharing within and across age classes in the saffron finch
    Benitez Saldivar, Maria Juliana
    Mino, Carolina Isabel
    Massoni, Viviana
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2020, 51 (12)
  • [25] Song repertoire and microgeographic variation in song types distribution in the corn bunting Miliaria calandra from Poland
    Osiejuk, TS
    Ratynska, K
    FOLIA ZOOLOGICA, 2003, 52 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [26] Age-related changes in song repertoire size and song type sharing in the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra
    Vaytina, T. M.
    Shitikov, D. A.
    BIOACOUSTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SOUND AND ITS RECORDING, 2019, 28 (02): : 140 - 154
  • [27] Repertoire size, song sharing and type matching in the Rufous Bristlebird (Dasyornis broadbenti)
    Rogers, D
    EMU, 2004, 104 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [28] AGE-RELATED VARIATION IN SONG REPERTOIRE SIZE AND REPERTOIRE SHARING OF YELLOW WARBLERS (DENDROICA-PETECHIA)
    COSENS, SE
    SEALY, SG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1986, 64 (09) : 1926 - 1929
  • [29] REPERTOIRE SIZE AND SYLLABLE SHARING IN THE SONG OF THE CLAY-COLORED THRUSH (TURDUS GRAYI)
    Vargas-Castro, Luis E.
    Sanchez, Natalie V.
    Barrantes, Gilbert
    WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2012, 124 (03): : 446 - 453
  • [30] REPERTOIRE SHARING AND SONG-POST DISTANCE IN NIGHTINGALES (LUSCINIA-MEGARHYNCHOS B)
    HULTSCH, H
    TODT, D
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1981, 8 (03) : 183 - 188