USABILITY OF WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE IN CHRONIC TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

被引:12
|
作者
Tarvonen-Schroder, Sinikka [1 ]
Tenovuo, Olli [1 ]
Kaljonen, Anne [4 ]
Laimi, Katri [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil & Brain Trauma, Div Clin Neurosci, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Biostat, Turku, Finland
关键词
activities and participation; disability; functioning; ICF; severity; chronic traumatic brain injury; WHODAS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; REHABILITATION; PARTICIPATION; RETURN; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.2340/16501977-2345
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate functioning measured with the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mild, moderate and severe traumatic brain injury, and to compare patients' experiences with assessments made by their significant others and by consultant neurologists. Methods: A total of 112 consecutive patients with traumatic brain injury (29 mild, 43 moderate, 40 severe) and their significant others completed a 12-item WHODAS 2.0 survey. A neurologist assessed functioning with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health minimal generic set. Results: The total patient and proxy WHODAS 2.0 sum score was rated as severe, and impairments in household tasks, learning, community life, emotional functions, concentrating, dealing with strangers, maintaining friendships, and working ability as around moderate in all 3 severity groups. In standing, walking, washing, and dressing oneself the reported impairments increased from mild in mild traumatic brain injury to moderate in severe traumatic brain injury. A neurologist rated the overall functioning, working ability, and motor activities most impaired in severe traumatic brain injury, while there were no between-group differences in energy and drive functions and emotional functions. Conclusion: Patients with chronic traumatic brain injury perceive a diversity of significant difficulties in activities and participation irrespective of the severity of the injury. We recommend assessing disability in traumatic brain injury with the short and understandable WHODAS 2.0 scale, when planning client-oriented services.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 518
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke
    Hu, Hsiang-Yueh
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (06) : 856 - 862
  • [42] International Literature Review on WHODAS II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II)
    Federici, Stefano
    Meloni, Fabio
    Lo Presti, Alessandra
    [J]. LIFE SPAN AND DISABILITY, 2009, 12 (01) : 85 - 112
  • [43] The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke
    Kucukdeveci, Ayse A.
    Kutlay, Sehim
    Yildizlar, Derya
    Oztuna, Derya
    Elhan, Atilla H.
    Tennant, Alan
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (03) : 214 - 220
  • [44] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
    Wawrzyniak, Kelly M.
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Schatman, Michael E.
    Kulich, Ronald J.
    Weed, Valerie F.
    Myrta, Eura
    DiBenedetto, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 1855 - 1862
  • [45] DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Gold, Liza H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2014, 42 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [46] Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia
    Gspandl, Scott
    Peirson, Ryan P.
    Nahhas, Ramzi W.
    Skale, Tracey Goodman
    Lehrer, Douglas S.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 259 : 251 - 253
  • [47] Functioning and disability in Brazilian stroke survivors: A study using the world health organization disability assessment schedule - WHODAS 2.0
    Janizello, Gustavo
    Da Silva, Ariadne
    Oliveira, Leia
    Mendes, Rafael
    Dos Santos, Heyriane
    Silva, Soraia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 455
  • [48] Functioning and disability of premenopausal women with urinary incontinence: An assessment by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-WHODAS 2.0
    de Macedo Dantas, Thaissa Hamana
    Castaneda, Luciana
    Correia, Grasiela Nascimento
    das Chagas Campelo, Clarissa Loureiro
    Dantas, Diego de Sousa
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 (06) : 1767 - 1774
  • [49] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among older adults in an Asian country
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Vaingankar, Janhavi A.
    Sagayadevan, Vathsala
    Shahwan, Shazana
    Picco, Louisa
    Chong, Siow Ann
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (05) : 246 - 253
  • [50] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    Coenen, Michaela
    Buchalla, Cassia Maria
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (07):