Ethnic Variation in Pelvimetric Measures and Its Impact on Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy

被引:30
|
作者
von Bodman, Christian
Matikainen, Mika P.
Yunis, Luis Herran
Laudone, Vincent
Scardino, Peter T.
Akin, Oguz
Rabbani, Farhang [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CANCER; SPECIMENS; LOCATION; PROGRESSION; RECURRENCE; DECISION; PELVIS; RACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate the ethnic variation in pelvimetry and its impact as a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) at radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Preoperative MRI was performed in 482 Caucasian and 103 African American (AA) men undergoing RP without previous treatment from July 2003 to January 2005 and November 2001 to June 2007, respectively. We measured bony and soft tissue dimensions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the pelvic inlet, midplane, prostate size, and apical depth. Analysis of covariance was performed to determine the effect of ethnicity on the midpelvic area (MPA). We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of overall and site-specific PSM. RESULTS AA men had a significantly steeper symphysis pubis angle (median, 43.1 vs. 41.3 degrees, respectively, P = .001) and smaller MPA (median, 78.5 vs. 83.9 cm(2), respectively, P = .004). Ethnicity and BMI were found to have a significant effect on MPA. Apical depth of the prostate was identified as a significant independent predictor of apical PSM, with a more pronounced effect in AA men. Pelvimetric measures were not a significant predictor of other sites of PSM. CONCLUSIONS AA men have a significantly smaller MPA and steeper symphysis angle. The adverse impact of a deep pelvis, as measured by the apical prostatic depth on apical PSM was found to be greater in AA men. Evaluation of pelvic dimensions and prostate parameters in preoperative MRI may add to our understanding of their impact on surgical outcomes. UROLOGY 76: 1092-1096, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1096
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic Value of Focal Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy
    Lee, Sangchul
    Kim, Ki Bom
    Jo, Jung Ki
    Ho, Jin-Nyoung
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Lee, Sang Eun
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2016, 14 (04) : E313 - E319
  • [42] Risk factors for positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy: review
    Descazeaud, A.
    Zerbib, M.
    Peyromaure, M.
    ANNALES D UROLOGIE, 2006, 40 (06) : 342 - 348
  • [43] Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome
    Felts de la Roca, Ricardo L. R.
    da Cunha, Isabela Werneck
    Bezerra, Stephania Martins
    da Fonseca, Francisco Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2014, 40 (03): : 306 - 315
  • [44] National trends in the management of patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy
    Kamyar Ghabili
    Henry S. Park
    James B. Yu
    Preston C. Sprenkle
    Simon P. Kim
    Kevin A. Nguyen
    Xiaomei Ma
    Cary P. Gross
    Michael S. Leapman
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1141 - 1151
  • [45] Influence of positive surgical margins on adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy
    Larre, Stephane
    Salomon, Laurent
    De la Taille, Alexandre
    Allory, Yves
    Hoznek, Andras
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Yiou, Rene
    Abbou, Clement-Claude
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 158 - 158
  • [46] Modification of risk of recurrence for radical prostatectomy patients with positive surgical margins
    Littman, P
    Chappell, R
    Seiferheld, W
    Bolles, C
    Huber, R
    Sanders, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 293 - 293
  • [47] PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS
    OHORI, M
    WHEELER, TM
    KATTAN, MW
    GOTO, Y
    SCARDINO, PT
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (05): : 1818 - 1824
  • [48] Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
    Saether, Thorstein
    Sorlien, Lars Tjugum
    Viset, Trond
    Lydersen, Stian
    Angelsen, Anders
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 42 (06): : 514 - 521
  • [49] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF FOCAL POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kim, Ki Bom
    Lee, In Jae
    Kim, Tae Jin
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong-Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Noh, Choong Hee
    Lee, Sang Eun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E685 - E685
  • [50] National trends in the management of patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Park, Henry S.
    Yu, James B.
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Kim, Simon P.
    Nguyen, Kevin A.
    Ma, Xiaomei
    Gross, Cary P.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (04) : 1141 - 1151