Botulinum neurotoxin injection for the treatment of epiphora in nasolacrimal duct obstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Girard, B. [1 ,2 ]
Piaton, J. -M. [3 ]
Keller, P. [3 ]
Abadie, C. [4 ]
Nguyen, T. H. [5 ]
机构
[1] GHU Est Parisien, Hosp Tenon, Dept Ophthalmol, 4 Rue Chine, F-75970 Paris 20, France
[2] Quinze Vingts Natl Hosp Ophthalmol, Dept Ophthalmol 5, 28 Rue Charenton, F-75012 Paris, France
[3] Quinze Vingts Natl Hosp Ophthalmol, Dept Ophthalmol 4, 28 Rue Charenton, F-75012 Paris, France
[4] CHU Caen, Dept Ophthalmol, F-14003 Caen, France
[5] Quinze Vingts Natl Hosp Ophthalmol, Dept Neuroradiol, 28 Rue Charenton, F-75012 Paris, France
来源
JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE | 2017年 / 40卷 / 08期
关键词
Epiphora; Tear; Lacrimal outflow obstruction; Botulinum neurotoxin A; Ptosis; Diplopia; CROCODILE TEARS; TOXIN TREATMENT; LACRIMAL GLAND; HYPERLACRIMATION; PALSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfo.7017.03.006
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. Retrospective long-term study to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) therapy for epiphora due to non-surgical nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Introduction. BoNT/A has been used successfully since 2000 in axillary hyperhidrosis to reduce secretory disorders. Some isolated cases of hyperlacrimation or crocodile tear syndrome have been treated on this basis. We used BoNT/A to decrease lacrimal secretion in cases of epiphora. Methods. We reviewed the qualitative and quantitative degree of improvement of epiphora; after botulinum neurotoxin injections in the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland, carried out in an ophthalmic centre between 2009 and 2016. Epiphora was graded using a questionnaire, Munk scores and Schirmer tests before and after injections. Severity of side effects was recorded. Results. Twenty-seven palpebral lacrimal glands of twenty patients with epiphora, mean age 65 +/- 13, were treated with BoNT/A (Botox (R) or Xeomin (R)) from April 2009 to April 2016. The epiphora was induced by persistent nasolacrimal duct stenosis after surgical treatment. No conventional medical nor surgical treatment was effective at this time. The technique of injection, dilution and dosage were specific. We re-injected 14/27 cases on an as-needed basis, 7/27 cases three times, 3/27 cases four times, and 2/27 cases (same patient both glands) five times. The Schirmer test measured a decrease of lacrimal secretion in 24/27 (89%) lacrimal glands after neurotoxin injection. Side effects were ptosis in 4 cases and transient esotropia in 2 cases. The authors describe the injection techniques, the dosage, the volume and concentration of BoNT/A. Conclusion. Patients with epiphora can be treated effectively with BoNT/A to reduce lacrimal secretion of the principal lacrimal gland in its palpebral portion. Ninety percent of the patients were very satisfied, with few side effects (ptosis or mild diplopia lasting from 3 days to 3 weeks). More studies are needed to delineate which types of epiphora can be treated with BoNT/A. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 665
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Balloon dilatation and stentimplantation of the nasolacrimal duct for chronic epiphora
    Lachmund, U
    Ammann-Rauch, D
    Forrer, A
    Grob, M
    Petralli, C
    Remonda, L
    Roeren, T
    Wilhelm, K
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2005, 102 (04): : 375 - 386
  • [32] Treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults with polyurethane stent
    Yazici, B
    Yazici, Z
    Parlak, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 131 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [33] Endoscopy changing the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Schellini, Silvana Artioli
    Akaishi, Patricia Mitiko Santello
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2024, 87 (03)
  • [34] Treatment of Camptodactyly Using Injection of Botulinum Neurotoxin
    Urban, Maciej
    Rutowski, Roman
    Urban, Jozef
    Mazurek, Piotr
    Kulinski, Sebastian
    Gosk, Jerzy
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 23 (03): : 399 - 402
  • [35] Stepwise treatment paradigm for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Casady, Douglas R.
    Meyer, Dale R.
    Simon, John W.
    Stasior, George O.
    Zobal-Ratner, Jitka L.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 22 (04): : 243 - 247
  • [36] Canaliculorhinostomy as a treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in dogs and cats
    Wallin-Haakansson, N.
    Berggren, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2020, 61 (06) : 346 - 353
  • [37] Repeat probing for treatment of persistent nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Repka, Michael X.
    Chandler, Danielle L.
    Bremer, Don L.
    Collins, Mary Louise Z.
    Lee, Dave H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2009, 13 (03): : 306 - 307
  • [38] The Effectiveness of Probing for the Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
    Esen, Ebru
    Ozcan, Altan Atakan
    Erdem, Elif
    Ciloglu, Emine
    Simdivar, Hande Goksu
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 42 (05): : 342 - 345
  • [39] Balloon dilatation for treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Yüksel, D
    Ceylan, K
    Erden, O
    Kiliç, R
    Duman, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 15 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [40] Probing and intubation as primary treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction?
    Robb, Richard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2007, 11 (02): : 113 - 113