Perceived Susceptibility to Breast Cancer Moderates the Effect of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages on Use of Screening Mammography

被引:85
|
作者
Gallagher, Kristel M. [1 ]
Updegraff, John A. [1 ]
Rothman, Alexander J. [2 ]
Sims, Linda [3 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] SUMMA Hlth Syst, Akron, OH USA
关键词
perceived risk; message framing; mammography; health behavior; persuasive communication; REPEAT MAMMOGRAPHY; LOW-INCOME; WOMEN; RISK; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; BEHAVIORS; ACCURACY; DECISION; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1037/a0022264
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: This study examined the role of three distinct beliefs about risk (risks associated with screening, construal of the function of screening as health-affirming or illness-detecting, and perceived susceptibility to breast cancer) in moderating women's responses to framed messages that promote mammography. Design: Three hundred fifty-five women recruited from an inner city hospital, nonadherent to guidelines for receiving annual screening mammograms, were randomly assigned to view a gain- or loss-framed video message about the importance of mammography. Main Outcome Measure: Mammography screening was self-reported at a 3-month follow-up. Results: Only perceived susceptibility to breast cancer significantly moderated the effect of message framing on screening. Women with average and higher levels of perceived susceptibility for breast cancer were significantly more likely to report screening after viewing a loss-framed message compared to a gain-framed message. No effects of framing on reported screening were observed for women with lower levels of perceived susceptibility. Conclusion: The study identifies a key role for perceived susceptibility in shaping responses to framed messages that promote cancer screenings.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Gain versus loss-framed messaging and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: A preliminary examination of perceived racism and culturally targeted dual messaging
    Lucas, Todd
    Hayman, Lenwood W., Jr.
    Blessman, James E.
    Asabigi, Kanzoni
    Novak, Julie M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 21 (02) : 249 - 267
  • [32] Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention
    O'Keefe, Daniel J.
    Wu, Daisy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 9 (06): : 2121 - 2133
  • [33] The effect of breast cancer screening messages on knowledge, attitudes, perceived risk, and mammography screening of African American women in the rural south
    Grindel, CG
    Brown, L
    Caplan, L
    Blumenthal, D
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2004, 31 (04) : 801 - 808
  • [34] Breast screening in response to gain, loss, and empowerment framed messages among diverse, low-income women
    Consedine, Nathan S.
    Horton, David
    Magai, Carol
    Kukafka, Rita
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2007, 18 (03) : 550 - 566
  • [35] An Initial Investigation Into Naturally Occurring Loss- and Gain-Framed Memorable Breast Cancer Messages
    Lauckner, Carolyn
    Smith, Sandi
    Kotowski, Michael
    Nazione, Samantha
    Stohl, Cynthia
    Prestin, Abby
    So, Jiyeon
    Nabi, Robin
    COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2012, 60 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [36] The Effects of Gender and Gain Versus Loss Frame on Processing Breast Cancer Screening Messages
    Kim, Hyo Jung
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (03) : 385 - 412
  • [37] The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France
    Buchmueller, Thomas C.
    Goldzahl, Leontine
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 27 (12) : 1963 - 1980
  • [38] A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years
    Calvocoressi, L
    Kasl, SV
    Lee, CH
    Stolar, M
    Claus, EB
    Jones, BA
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2004, 13 (12) : 2096 - 2105