Reliability and validity of the knowledge about Depression and Mania Inventory

被引:11
|
作者
Kronmueller, Klaus-Thomas [1 ]
Saha, Rina [1 ]
Kratz, Benita [1 ]
Karr, Markus [1 ]
Hunt, Aoife [1 ]
Mundt, Christoph [1 ]
Backenstrass, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Psychiat, DE-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
knowledge; illness; depression; Mania; test validationg;
D O I
10.1159/000111550
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The knowledge that patients with affective disorders have about their illness is attributed increasing importance. For a number of psychiatric disorders, the imparting of information about the illness is now standard treatment. However, the relevance of knowledge about a patient's disorder has to date not been sufficiently studied. One reason for that is that only few psychometrically validated instruments for the assessment of illness knowledge exist. The aim of this study was the development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge about affective disorders. Methods: The Knowledge about Depression and Mania Inventory ( KDMI) was evaluated with a sample of 337 patients with major depression, relatives of patients with depression and schizophrenia, and controls. Results: With the 44-item KDMI, the 3 dimensions knowledge of symptoms, knowledge of treatment and knowledge of coping strategies were differentiated. From these 44 items two 22-item parallel tests were developed for follow-up assessment. The scales showed good internal consistency. There were numerous indicators of the validity and sensitivity to change of the scales. It was shown that older patients and patients with lower levels of education are less knowledgeable about affective disorders. There were significant differences in the scales of the KDMI before and after a psychoeducative group for relatives. Conclusions: The study showed that knowledge about affective disorders can be reliably and validly measured by a questionnaire. Because of its brevity the KDMI is suitable for everyday use in clinical practice, and it forms the basis for further investigation of the significance of illness knowledge, as well as for evaluation of the effects of psychotherapy in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY FOR A WHITE AND MEXICAN-AMERICAN GERONTIC POPULATION
    GATEWOODCOLWELL, G
    KACZMAREK, M
    AMES, MH
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1989, 65 (03) : 1163 - 1166
  • [22] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY-II APPLIED TO CHINESE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS
    Zhu, Jianbo
    Zhang, Jinwen
    Sheng, Zhaohan
    Wang, Fengting
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2018, 46 (02): : 249 - 258
  • [23] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF JESNESS INVENTORY - CAUTION
    SHARK, ML
    HANDAL, PJ
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 45 (04) : 692 - 695
  • [24] Validity and Reliability of the Geriatric Sexuality Inventory
    Kazer, Meredith Wallace
    Grossman, Sheila
    Kerins, Gerard
    Kris, Alison
    Tocchi, Christine
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2013, 39 (11): : 38 - 45
  • [25] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE HISPANIC STRESS INVENTORY
    CERVANTES, RC
    PADILLA, AM
    DESNYDER, NS
    HISPANIC JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 1990, 12 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [26] THE ANOMALOUS EXPERIENCES INVENTORY - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    GALLAGHER, C
    KUMAR, VK
    PEKALA, RJ
    JOURNAL OF PARAPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 58 (04) : 402 - 428
  • [27] THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE CHINESE POLARITY INVENTORY
    ZHENG, YP
    LIN, KM
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 89 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [28] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE BECK ANXIETY INVENTORY
    FYDRICH, T
    DOWDALL, D
    CHAMBLESS, DL
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1992, 6 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [29] Validity and reliability of the Bernreuter Personality Inventory
    Stagner, R
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1933, 28 : 413 - 418
  • [30] RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF THE FATIGUE SYMPTOM INVENTORY
    Oksuz, E.
    Malhan, S.
    Tulunay, F. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A426 - A426