3D bioprinting in airway reconstructive surgery: A pilot study

被引:6
|
作者
Torsello, Miriam [1 ,9 ]
Salvati, Antonio [1 ]
Borro, Luca [2 ]
Meucci, Duino [1 ]
Tropiano, Maria Luisa [1 ]
Cialente, Fabrizio [3 ]
Secinaro, Aurelio [4 ]
Del Fattore, Andrea [5 ]
Emiliana, Caristo Maria [6 ]
Francalanci, Paola [7 ]
Battafarano, Giulia [5 ]
Cacciotti, Ilaria [8 ]
Trozzi, Marilena [1 ]
机构
[1] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Dept Surg Specialties, Airway Surg Unit, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[2] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Dept Imaging, Clin Management & Technol Innovat Area, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Sense Organ, Viale Policlin 155, I-00186 Rome, Italy
[4] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Dept Imaging, Adv Cardiovasc Imaging Unit, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[5] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Genet & Rare Dis Res Div, Bone Physiopathol Res Unit, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[7] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Dept Pathol, IRCCS, I-00165 Rome, Italy
[8] Univ Rome Niccolo Cusano, Dept Engn, INSTM RU, I-00166 Rome, Italy
[9] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Airway Surg Unit, IRCCS, Dept Surg Specialties, Piazza Sant Onofrio 4, I-00165 Rome, Italy
关键词
Laryngotracheal; Graft; 3D scaffold; Pediatric tracheal stenosis; Subglottic stenosis; Printing; SLIDE TRACHEOPLASTY; MANAGEMENT; STENOSIS; CHILDREN; INFANTS; SHEEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111253
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Open surgery is a reliable choice for congenital subglottic stenosis, that represents the third most common congenital anomaly of the larynx. One of the procedures performed is anterior laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) with anterior rib graft. The objective of this preliminary study was to evaluate the potential of 3D printing technology for the realization of laryngo-tracheal scaffold in Polycaprolactone (PCL) implanted in vivo in ovine animal model.Methods: A 3D computer model of a laryngeal graft and a tracheal graft was designed and printed with PCL through 3D additive manufacturing technology. The scaffolds were seeded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells and cultured in vitro for up to 14 days. Anterior graft LTR with 3D printed scaffolds was performed on 5 sheep. The animals underwent endoscopic examinations at the first, 3rd, 6th, and 12th weeks after surgery and before sacrifice. The integration of the material was evaluated by the pathologist.Results: Two animals showed a favourable postoperative course and were sacrificed at 6 months postoperatively. In these cases, we observed endoscopically a complete integration of the cellularized PCL scaffold into the peri-implant tissues, and the pathologist found the growth of respiratory epithelium on the scaffold's inner surface. Other two animals showed a difficult post-operative recovery characterized by respiratory distress resulting in early sacrifice on postoperative days 31 and 33. In these animals we found a poor integration of the grafts into the tracheal structure, and a better integration of the laryngeal scaffold. The last animal developed a wound abscess and was sacrificed 80 days after surgery. We observed, in this case, a poor scaffold integration and an acute inflammatory reaction.Conclusions: From the preliminary data obtained we found that the excessive stiffness of the material, along with the anatomical features of the sheep, is a major limitation of this study. It will be necessary in the future to create a new biocompatible, more flexible and elastic graft, to achieve greater integration into surrounding tissues. Bioconstructed grafts could simplify surgery for the treatment of laryngo-tracheal stenosis, particularly in the treatment of long tracheal stenoses, which have, at the moment, very complex surgical options. Level of evidence: NA.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D Bioprinting of Human Skin
    Gatenholm, P.
    Hingert, D.
    Vega, S. F.
    Haag, D.
    Ericson, M.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S274 - S274
  • [32] 3D bioprinting of structural proteins
    Wlodarczyk-Biegun, Malgorzata K.
    del Campo, Aranzazu
    BIOMATERIALS, 2017, 134 : 180 - 201
  • [33] Prospects for 3D bioprinting of organoids
    Preety Rawal
    Dinesh M.Tripathi
    Seeram Ramakrishna
    Savneet Kaur
    Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 2021, (03) : 627 - 640
  • [34] Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview
    Gungor-Ozkerim, P. Selcan
    Inci, Ilyas
    Zhang, Yu Shrike
    Khademhosseini, Ali
    Dokmeci, Mehmet Remzi
    BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (05) : 915 - 946
  • [35] The Effect of Agarose on 3D Bioprinting
    Gong, Chi
    Kong, Zhiyuan
    Wang, Xiaohong
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [36] 3D Bioprinting: A deliberate business
    Hockaday, Laura
    Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 2015, 35 (01): : 14 - 17
  • [37] Advanced 3D Bioprinting Technologies
    Leonov D.V.
    Spirina Y.A.
    Yatsenko A.A.
    Kushnarev V.A.
    Ustinov E.M.
    Barannikov S.V.
    Cell and Tissue Biology, 2021, 15 (6) : 616 - 627
  • [38] Machine learning and 3D bioprinting
    Sun, Jie
    Yao, Kai
    An, Jia
    Jing, Linzhi
    Huang, Kaizhu
    Huang, Dejian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING, 2023, 9 (04) : 48 - 61
  • [39] Collagen Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting
    Bagley, B.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2017, 23 : S57 - S57
  • [40] 3D Bioprinting of Lignocellulosic Biomaterials
    Shavandi, Amin
    Hosseini, Soraya
    Okoro, Oseweuba Valentine
    Nie, Lei
    Eghbali Babadi, Farahnaz
    Melchels, Ferry
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2020, 9 (24)