Defining the role of the bladder-neck sling in the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic incontinence

被引:22
|
作者
Gosalbez, R [1 ]
Castellan, M
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Jackson Mem Hosp, Div Pediat Urol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Miami Children Hosp, Dept Urol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s003450050068
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patient selection for the creation of a fascial sling procedure to increase outlet resistance has been somewhat controversial. We review our experience with the fascial sling technique and report our patient selection process. Since 1991, 30 patients, including 6 males and 24 females aged 4-20 years (mean 10 years), underwent a rectus fascial sling procedure as part of their reconstructive efforts for continence. The underlying cause of incontinence was neurogenic in 28 patients. All males were prepubertal. Videourodynamics were performed in all patients preoperatively. Criteria for enhancement of bladder-outlet resistance included a detrusor leak-point pressure (LPPd) of < 50 cmH(2)O; a stress leak-point pressure (LPPs) of < 100 cmH(2)O; an open bladder neck, irrespective of LPP; and clinical evidence of stress incontinence, irrespective of videourodynamic parameters. Technical aspects of the procedure are discussed. Augmentation cystoplasty was performed in 29 patients with poor bladder compliance. In 18 patients a catheterizable stoma was also created. The period of follow-up currently ranges from 2 to 70 (mean 37) months. In all, 28 patients (93%) became continent and 2 female patients remain incontinent with a low LPP. All patients are on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC); 12 patients (40%) are catheterizing per urethra without difficulty. All prepubertal males are completely dry. The fascial sling repair has many advantages over other methods for increasing outlet resistance, including simplicity of technique, effectiveness, minimal likelihood of erosion, and low cost.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 291
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLOSURE OF THE BLADDER NECK FOR NEUROGENIC INCONTINENCE
    SYME, RRA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1979, 51 (05): : 425 - 425
  • [22] BLADDER NECK CLOSURE FOR NEUROGENIC INCONTINENCE
    SYME, RRA
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 51 (02): : 197 - 200
  • [23] Bladder neck broad based polypropylene sling for stress urinary incontinence
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Singh, Kamal Jeet
    Suri, Amit
    Singh, Pratipal
    Mandhani, Anil
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 22 (01) : 53 - 55
  • [24] Use of polydimethylsiloxane in the endoscopic treatment of urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic bladder.
    Guys, JM
    Louis-Borrione, C
    Battagliola, D
    le Hors-Albouze, H
    Petit, P
    ANNALES D UROLOGIE, 1999, 33 (05) : 351 - 355
  • [25] Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in children
    Skari, Hans
    Urdal, Andreas
    Hagen, Trine Saether
    Bjerre, Anna
    Aksnes, Gunnar
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2020, 140 (04) : 368 - 373
  • [26] Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in children
    Snyder, HM
    Arap, S
    Bloom, D
    Fisch, M
    Gonzalez, R
    Mitchell, M
    Nijman, R
    Woodhouse, C
    INCONTINENCE, 1999, : 551 - 578
  • [27] Refractory Urinary Incontinence in Girls: The Role of the Bladder Neck
    Chrzan, Rafal
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2017, 5
  • [28] TREATMENT OF FEMALE URINARY STRESS-INCONTINENCE WITH BLADDER-NECK SUSPENSION PLASTY ACCORDING TO ZOEDLER AND A NEW FORM-STABLE RADIOPAQUE POLYESTER SLING
    STEFFENS, J
    STEFFENS, L
    KRANZ, A
    UROLOGE-AUSGABE A, 1987, 26 (03): : 146 - 151
  • [29] Treatment of neurogenic urinary incontinence in children. A review
    Mure, PY
    Feyaerts, A
    Morel-Journel, N
    Mollard, P
    Mouriquand, P
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2000, 10 (04): : 644 - 652
  • [30] Transobturator synthetic sling for surgical treatment of male urinary incontinence
    Petrov, S. B.
    Bakal, S. A.
    Shkarupa, D. D.
    Karnaukhov, I. V.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2011, 7 (02): : 69 - 72