Competitive sorption of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils

被引:337
|
作者
Violante, A [1 ]
Pigna, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dipartimento Sci Suolo Pianta & Ambiente, I-80055 Naples, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2002.1788
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Sorption and desorption of AsO4 on or from different soil components may have a dominant role in regulating As mobility in soils. The objectives of this work were to provide information on the factors that influence the competitive sorption of AsO4 and PO4 in soil. We studied the competitive sorption of PO4 and AsO4 on selected phyllosilicates, metal oxides, synthetic organo-mineral complexes, and soil samples as affected by pH (4.0-8.0), ligands concentration, surface coverage of the oxyanions on the samples and the residence time. We found that Mn, Fe, and Ti oxides and phyllosilicates particularly rich in Fe (nontronite, ferruginous smectites) were more effective in sorbing AsO4 than PO4. In fact, by adding AsO4 and PO4 as a mixture (AsO4/PO4 molar ratio of 1) more AsO4 than PO4 was usually sorbed on birnessite, pyrolusite, goethite, nontronite, and ferruginous smectite, but more PO4 than AsO4 was sorbed on noncrystalline Al precipitation products, gibbsite, boehmite, allophane, and kaolinite. For example, at pH 5.0 the sorbed AsO4/sorbed PO4 molar ratio (rf) was 1.81 for birnessite,1.05 for nontronite, but was only 0.45 for kaolinite and 0.14 for allophane. For montmorillonite, illite, and vermiculite the rf values were slightly <1. For soil samples, particularly rich in kaolinite, halloysite, allophane, and containing relatively large amounts of organic C, the rf values were usually much <1. For all the samples, the rf values increased by decreasing the pH and with the residence time of the oxyanions. The sorption of AsO4 (or PO4) on goethite and gibbsite decreased by increasing the initial PO4/AsO4 (or AsO4/PO4 molar ratio) up to 2.0. However, PO4 inhibited AsO4 sorption more on gibbsite than on goethite, whereas AsO4 prevented PO4 sorption more on goethite than on gibbsite. The data reported in this paper suggest that the mobility, the bioavailability, and the toxicity of As in soil environments may be greatly affected by the nature of soil components, pH, presence of anions (PO4), and residence time.
引用
收藏
页码:1788 / 1796
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ALLUAUDITE-GROUP PHOSPHATE AND ARSENATE MINERALS
    Tait, Kimberly T.
    Hawthorne, Frank C.
    Halden, Norman M.
    CANADIAN MINERALOGIST, 2021, 59 (01): : 243 - 263
  • [32] Zinc(II) Sorption Characteristics of Soils in Predominant Smectite, Illite and Kaolinite Clay Minerals
    Yilmaz, K.
    Saltali, K.
    Guzel, E. U.
    Dikici, H.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2010, 22 (02) : 1487 - 1494
  • [33] Correction to: Phytotoxin sorption to clay minerals
    Carina D. Schönsee
    Felix E. Wettstein
    Thomas D. Bucheli
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2021, 33 (1)
  • [34] KINETICS OF Cs SORPTION TO CLAY MINERALS
    Sapolaite, J.
    Lujaniene, G.
    Mazeika, K.
    Amulevicius, A.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADIATION INTERACTION WITH MATERIALS AND ITS USE IN TECHNOLOGIES 2008, 2008, : 222 - 225
  • [35] SORPTION OF SILICA BY CLAY-MINERALS
    SIEVER, R
    WOODFORD, N
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1973, 37 (08) : 1851 - 1880
  • [36] KINETICS OF CESIUM SORPTION BY CLAY MINERALS
    SAWHNEY, BL
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1966, 30 (05): : 565 - +
  • [37] Anionic polysaccharide sorption by clay minerals
    Dontsova, KM
    Bigham, JM
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (04) : 1026 - 1035
  • [38] Cesium sorption by some clay minerals
    Dunaeva, AN
    Mironenko, MV
    GEOKHIMIYA, 2000, (02): : 213 - 221
  • [39] Sorption of Phosphate from Acidic Wastewater into Three Tunisian Type Clay Soils
    Hamdi, N.
    Srasra, E.
    JOURNAL OF WATER CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 30 (04) : 208 - 214
  • [40] Sorption of phosphate from acidic wastewater into three Tunisian type clay soils
    N. Hamdi
    E. Srasra
    Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 2008, 30 : 208 - 214