In-vessel tritium retention and removal in ITER

被引:238
|
作者
Federici, G
Anderl, RA
Andrew, P
Brooks, JN
Causey, RA
Coad, JP
Cowgill, D
Doerner, RP
Haasz, AA
Janeschitz, G
Jacob, W
Longhurst, GR
Nygren, R
Peacock, A
Pick, MA
Philipps, V
Roth, J
Skinner, CH
Wampler, WR
机构
[1] ITER JWS Carching Coctr, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
[3] Jet Joint Undertaking, Abingdon OX14 3EA, Oxon, England
[4] Argonne Natl Lab, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[5] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[6] Sandia Natl Labs, Livermore, CA USA
[7] Univ Toronto, Inst Aerosp Studies, N York, ON M3H 5T6, Canada
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[9] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[10] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Plasmaphys, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[11] Princeton Univ, Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
关键词
ITER; tritium inventory; divertor erosion; plasma facing materials; hydrogen retention;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00876-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Tritium retention inside the vacuum vessel has emerged as a potentially serious constraint in the operation of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), In this paper we review recent tokamak and laboratory data on hydrogen, deuterium and tritium retention for materials and conditions which are of direct relevance to the design of ITER. These data, together with significant advances in understanding the underlying physics, provide the basis for modelling predictions of the tritium inventory in ITER. We present the derivation, and discuss the results, of current predictions both in terms of implantation and codeposition rates, and critically discuss their uncertainties and sensitivity to important design and operation parameters such as the plasma edge conditions, the surface temperature, the presence of mixed-materials, etc. These analyses are consistent with recent tokamak findings and show that codeposition of tritium occurs on the divertor surfaces primarily with carbon eroded from a limited area of the divertor near the strike zones. This issue remains an area of serious concern for ITER. The calculated codeposition rates for ITER are relatively high and the in-vessel tritium inventory limit could be reached, under worst assumptions, in approximately a week of continuous operation. We discuss the implications of these estimates on the design, operation and safety of ITER and present a strategy for resolving the issues. We conclude that as long as carbon is used in ITER and more generically in any other next-step experimental fusion facility fuelled with tritium - the efficient control and removal of the codeposited tritium is essential. There is a critical need to develop and test in situ cleaning techniques and procedures that are beyond the current experience of present-day tokamaks. We review some of the principal methods that are being investigated and tested, in conjunction with the R&D work still required to extrapolate their applicability to ITER. Finally, unresolved issues are identified and recommendations are made on potential R&D avenues for their resolution. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V, All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 29
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Remote maintenance of in-vessel components for ITER
    Burgess, T
    Haange, R
    Hager, R
    Hattori, Y
    Herndon, J
    Holloway, C
    Maisonnier, D
    Martin, E
    Matsuhira, N
    Shibanuma, K
    Sironi, M
    Tada, E
    Tesini, A
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1998, 42 : 455 - 461
  • [22] OVERVIEW OF THE DESIGN OF IN-VESSEL COMPONENTS FOR ITER
    PARKER, RR
    FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 26 (03): : 273 - 283
  • [23] Integration of ITER in-vessel diagnostic components in the vacuum vessel
    Encheva, A.
    Bertalot, L.
    Macklin, B.
    Vayakis, G.
    Walker, C.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2009, 84 (2-6) : 736 - 742
  • [24] ITER vacuum vessel, in-vessel components and plasma facing materials
    Ioki, K.
    Barabash, V.
    Cordier, J.
    Enoeda, M.
    Federici, G.
    Kim, B. C.
    Mazul, I.
    Merola, M.
    Morimoto, M.
    Nakahira, M.
    Pick, M.
    Rozov, V.
    Shimada, M.
    Suzuki, S.
    Ulrickson, M.
    Utin, Yu.
    Wang, X.
    Wu, S.
    Yu, J.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2008, 83 (7-9) : 787 - 794
  • [25] Design standard issues for ITER in-vessel components
    Majumdar, Saurin
    Fusion Engineering and Design, 1995, 29 (pt C): : 158 - 163
  • [26] Assessment and selection of materials for ITER in-vessel components
    Kalinin, G
    Barabash, V
    Cardella, A
    Dietz, J
    Ioki, K
    Matera, R
    Santoro, RT
    Tivey, R
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2000, 283 : 10 - 19
  • [27] Nuclear analysis of the ITER In-Vessel viewing system
    Travleev, Anton
    Qiu, Yuefeng
    Fischer, Ulrich
    Pampin, Raul
    Puiu, Adrian
    Reichle, Roger
    Flammini, Davide
    Villari, Rosaria
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 136 : 247 - 251
  • [28] DEVELOPMENT OF CODES & STANDARDS FOR ITER IN-VESSEL COMPONENTS
    Couso, Daniel
    Fano, Jose
    Fernandez, Felicidad
    Fernandez, Elena
    Guirao, Julio A.
    Lastra, Jose L.
    Martinez, Victor J.
    Ordieres, Javier
    Vazquez, Ivan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE VOL 1: CODES AND STANDARDS, 2012, : 313 - +
  • [29] Development of in-vessel components of the microfission chamber for ITER
    Ishikawa, M.
    Kondoh, T.
    Ookawa, K.
    Fujita, K.
    Yamauchi, M.
    Hayakawa, A.
    Nishitani, T.
    Kusama, Y.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2010, 81 (10):
  • [30] The ITER In-Vessel Coils - design finalization and challenges
    Vostner, Alexander
    Bontemps, Vincent
    Encheva, Anna
    Jin, Huan
    Laquiere, Julien
    Macioce, Davide
    Mariani, Nicola
    Mcintosh, Simon
    Peng, Xuebing
    Singh, Shuvay
    Spigo, Giancarlo
    Tronza, Vladimir
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2019, 146 : 1490 - 1495