Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Airfoil Flow Control Aiming at Lift-to-Drag Ratio Improvement

被引:4
|
作者
Ohashi, Masahiro [1 ]
Fukagata, Koji [2 ]
Tokugawa, Naoko [3 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Ctr Appl & Computat Mech, Dept Mech Engn, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2238522, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2238522, Japan
[3] Japan Aerosp Explorat Agcy, Aeronaut Technol Directorate, Tokyo 1810015, Japan
关键词
Sensitivity Analysis; Lift to Drag Ratio; Freestream Velocity; Airfoil; Lift Coefficient; Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes; Friction Reduction; Boundary Layer Thickness; Eddy Viscosity; Direct Numerical Simulation; REDUCTION; FRICTION;
D O I
10.2514/1.J060415
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Sensitivities of drag and lift to body force and blowing/suction are investigated based on a continuous adjoint method through Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation (RANS). For a Clark-Y airfoil, changes in the drag, the lift, and the lift-to-drag ratio are found to be caused by different mechanisms depending on the type and locations of control input. Improvement in the lift-to-drag ratio by body forces is achieved by both pressure drag reduction and pressure lift enhancement. The effective angle for blowing/suction is nearly normal to the surface, and blowing around the leading edge and blowing/suction on the lower/upper surface near the trailing edge improve the lift-to-drag ratio effectively. Investigation on the control amplitude reveals that the present sensitivity analysis is valid when the blowing/suction velocity is less than 1% of the freestream velocity. The sensitivities are observed to be slightly weakened by decreasing the Reynolds number due to the difference in the baseline drag and lift coefficients, whereas the higher angle of attack is found to raise the sensitivities. Finally, the similar sensitivity analysis is performed also for NACA4412 and NACA0012, and it is found that slight differences in the shape result in substantial differences in the sensitivities.
引用
收藏
页码:4437 / 4448
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Second-order adjoint-based sensitivity for hydrodynamic stability and control
    Boujo, Edouard
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2021, 920
  • [42] Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of char combustion surface reaction kinetics
    Hassan, Ahmed
    Sayadi, Taraneh
    Schiemann, Martin
    Scherer, Viktor
    FUEL, 2021, 287
  • [43] Adjoint-based parametric sensitivity analysis for swirling M-flames
    Skene, Calum S.
    Schmid, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 859 : 516 - 542
  • [44] Adjoint-based fluid flow control and optimisation with lattice Boltzmann methods
    Krause, Mathias J.
    Thaeter, Gudrun
    Heuveline, Vincent
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 65 (06) : 945 - 960
  • [45] Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of viscoelastic fluids at a low deborah number
    Kim, Jaekwang
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2023, 115 : 453 - 469
  • [46] A MATLAB Toolbox for Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Switched Reluctance Motors
    Sayed, Ehab
    Bakr, Mohamed H.
    Bilgin, Berker
    Emadi, Ali
    2018 IEEE ELECTRICAL POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC), 2018,
  • [47] Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of quantities of interest of complex combustion models
    Lemke, Mathias
    Cai, Liming
    Reiss, Julius
    Pitsch, Heinz
    Sesterhenn, Joern
    COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2019, 23 (01) : 180 - 196
  • [48] Cessna 172 G1000 Aircraft Airfoil Optimization Using Particle Swarm Optimization Method Applying a Direct Airfoil Design Approach to Obtain the Maximum Lift-to-Drag Ratio
    Zeleke D.S.
    Asfaw A.Y.
    Bizuneh B.L.
    Michael L.W.
    Russian Aeronautics, 2023, 66 (04): : 789 - 798
  • [49] Objective function choice for control of a thermocapillary flow using an adjoint-based control strategy
    Muldoon, Frank H.
    Kuhlmann, Hendrik C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2015, 56 : 28 - 42
  • [50] Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of periodic orbits by the Fourier-Galerkin method
    Sierra, J.
    Jolivet, P.
    Giannetti, F.
    Citro, V.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2021, 440 (440)