German National Case Collection for familial pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa) - acceptance and psychological aspects of a pancreatic cancer screening program

被引:10
|
作者
Franke, Frederike S. [1 ]
Matthaei, Elvira [1 ]
Slater, Emily P. [1 ]
Schicker, Christoph [1 ]
Kruse, Johannes [2 ]
Bartsch, Detlef K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Visceral Thoracic & Vasc Surg, Natl Case Collect Familial Pancreat Canc FaPaCa, Baldingerstr, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Baldingerstr, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
关键词
Familial pancreatic cancer; Screening program; Acceptance of screening; Psychological aspects of screening; HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; BREAST-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; IMPACT; FEASIBILITY; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; MUTATIONS; NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.1186/s13053-018-0100-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundPancreatic cancer screening is recommended to individuals at risk (IAR) of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families, but little is known about the acceptance of such screening programs. Thus, the acceptance and psychological aspects of a controlled FPC screening program was evaluated.MethodsIAR of FPC families underwent comprehensive counseling by a geneticist and pancreatologist prior to the proposed screening. Participating IAR, IAR who discontinued screening and IAR who never participated in the screening program were invited to complete questionnaires to assess the motivation for participating in surveillance, cancer worries, structural distress and experiences with participation. Questionnaires were completed anonymously to receive most accurate answers.ResultsOf 286 IAR to whom pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) screening was recommended, 139 (48.6%) IAR regularly participated (group 1), 49 (17.1%) IAR (group 2) discontinued screening after median 1 (1-10) screening visits and 98 (34.2%) IAR (group 3) never underwent screening. The overall response rate of questionnaires was 67% (189/286) with rates of 100% (139 of 139 IAR), 49% (29 of 49 IAR) and 23.4% (23 of 98 IAR) for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At least 93% of IAR felt adequately informed about the screening program after initial counseling. However, only 38.8% received knowledge of or the recommendation for PDAC screening by physicians. The reported cancer-related distress and the fear of investigations were highest in group 1, but acceptably low in all three groups. The main reasons to discontinue or not to participate in screening were the time efforts and travel costs (groups 2 and 3 48,7%).ConclusionLess than 50% of IAR regularly participate in a proposed PDAC screening program, although the associated psychological burden is quite low. Physicians should be educated about high risk PDAC groups and screening recommendations. Time and travel efforts must be reduced to encourage more IAR to participate in a recommended screening.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ABOUT THE NATIONAL-PANCREATIC-CANCER-PROGRAM OF THE NCI
    LIEBOW, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY, 1986, 1 (02) : 156 - 158
  • [22] HERITABILITY OF FAMILIAL PANCREATIC CANCER IN A DANISH NATIONAL FAMILY COHORT
    Tan, Ming
    Brusgaard, Klaus
    Gerdes, Anne-Marie A.
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    De Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky
    Joergensen, Maiken T.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S663 - S663
  • [23] Familial Pancreatic Cancer: The Case for Prophylactic Pancreatectomy in Lieu of Serial Screening and Shared Decision Making
    Iskandar, Mazen E.
    Wayne, Michael G.
    Steele, Justin G.
    Cooperman, Avram M.
    CASE REPORTS IN ONCOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
  • [24] Feasibility and Yield of Screening in Relatives From Familial Pancreatic Cancer Families
    Ludwig, Emmy
    Olson, Sara H.
    Bayuga, Sharon
    Simon, Jennifer
    Schattner, Mark A.
    Gerdes, Hans
    Allen, Peter J.
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Kurtz, Robert C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (05): : 946 - 954
  • [25] Pancreatic Cancer Screening and Surveillance Program-Local Outcomes
    Lachter, Jesse
    Half, Elizabeth
    Khamaysi, Iyad
    Yassin, Kamel A.
    Hananya, Tomer
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB335 - AB335
  • [27] NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE PANCREATIC CARCINOGENESIS PROGRAM - INTRODUCTION
    PLEDGER, RA
    BATES, RR
    SAFFIOTTI, U
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1975, 35 (08) : 2226 - 2227
  • [28] Prognosis of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC): A matched case analysis
    O'Kane, G. M.
    Borgida, A.
    Dodd, A.
    Aung, K. L.
    Holter, S.
    Knox, J.
    Gallinger, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [29] Pancreatic cancer - progression prior diagnosis - a phenotypic case collection
    Zedler, Paul
    Fasshauer, Martin
    Cameron, Silke
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 47 : 78 - 78
  • [30] Feasibility of a pancreatic cancer surveillance program from a psychological point of view
    Harinck, Femme
    Nagtegaal, Tanja
    Kluijt, Irma
    Aalfs, Cora
    Smets, Ellen
    Poley, Jan-Werner
    Wagner, Anja
    van Hooft, Jeanin
    Fockens, Paul
    Bruno, Marco
    Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (12) : 1015 - 1024