The effector component of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response has a biphasic pattern after burn injury

被引:30
|
作者
Hunt, JP [1 ]
Hunter, CT
Brownstein, MR
Giannopoulos, A
Hultman, CS
deSerres, S
Bracey, L
Frelinger, J
Meyer, AA
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Coll Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Immunol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
cytotoxic T lymphocytes; burn injury; CD4; CD8; interleukin-2; interleukin-5; interferon-gamma; effector limb;
D O I
10.1006/jsre.1998.5488
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Burn injury delays allograft rejection and impairs the host defense against infection. These functions are mediated via the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response. The CTL response is divided into antigen recognition/processing and effector phases. Presensitization allows selective analysis of changes, induced by burn injury, in the effector limb of the CTL response in relation to time and burn size. Methods. Anesthetized CBA mice were primed with either a flank allograft from C57BL/6 (B6) mice or an autograft (negative control). Five weeks after grafting, animals were anesthetized and received either a 0, 20, or 40% burn. Spleens were harvested 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after burn injury (n = 96), cocultured with B6 stimulator splenocytes, and assessed for CTL response to radiolabeled allogeneic targets in a Cr-51 release assay. In experiment 2, spleens were harvested from unburned and 40% burned animals on Postburn Days 3 and 14. After triple staining, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD4, CD8, and CD25 antigens. In experiment 3, splenocytes from 0 and 40% burned animals on Postburn Days 3 and 14, were cocultured with B6 stimulators for 5 days. Supernatants were evaluated for interleukin (IL)-2, IL-5, and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) using ELISA. Results. The CTL response for 20 and 40% burned animals decreased 3 days postburn (-11.9 and -30.1%, P < 0.05), returned to baseline in 7-10 days, and was increased by 14 days postburn (15.8 and 22.6%, P < 0.05). The T-helper lymphocyte population (CD4) from 40% burn animals was significantly decreased on Postburn Days 3 and 14 (10.12 +/- 0.45% vs 11.78 +/- 0.29% and 10.19 +/- 0.24% vs 14.21 +/- 0.97%, respectively, P < 0.05). The CTL effector (CD8) splenocyte population was significantly higher in the burned animals on Postburn Day 14 (4.55% vs 3.71%, P < 0.05). On Postburn Day 3, average IL-5 production was higher in the burned animals (1.80 pg/ml vs 0.59 pg/ml, respectively, P < 0.05). The burn group, on Postburn Days 3 and 14, showed a decrease in mean IL-2 production (212.81 pg/ml vs 263.6 pg/ml and 342.7 pg/ml vs 421.4 pg/ml, respectively, P < 0.05). Mean IFN-gamma production on Postburn Days 3 and 14 was decreased in burned mice (263.75 pg/ml vs 285.57 pg/ml and 218.16 pg/ml vs 263.42 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Conclusions. Burn injury impairs the effector limb of the CTL response as a function of burn size in the immediate postburn period. CTL activity returns to baseline within 7-10 days postburn and has a rebound increase by Day 14. Early CTL suppression, after burn injury, may be due to a decrease in the T-helper subpopulation. The late increase in cytotoxicity may be secondary to an increase in the effector CTL population in the late postburn period. Burn injury causes a T-helper-2 phenotype as demonstrated by depressed IL-2 and IFN-gamma production and increased IL-5 production. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 251
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response and virus cytopathogenicity in the virus decline during antiviral therapy
    Ganusov, VV
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1523) : 1513 - 1518
  • [22] THE CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSE TO HTLV-I IN HEALTHY CARRIERS AND TSP/HAM PATIENTS
    BANGHAM, CRM
    DAENKE, S
    KERMODE, A
    HALL, S
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 1995, 11 : S127 - S127
  • [23] CHARACTERIZATION OF THE HIV-1-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSE DURING ACUTE INFECTION
    SAFRIT, JT
    ANDREWS, CA
    LEE, A
    KOUP, RA
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, : 22 - 22
  • [24] Soluble cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4: a favorable predictor in malignant tumors after therapy
    Liu, Qiqi
    Hu, Pingping
    Deng, Guodong
    Zhang, Jingxin
    Liang, Ning
    Xie, Jian
    Qiao, Lili
    Luo, Hui
    Zhang, Jiandong
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 2147 - 2154
  • [25] Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses to enhanced green and yellow fluorescent proteins after myeloablative conditioning
    Morris, JC
    Kiem, HP
    BLOOD, 2004, 104 (05) : 1579 - 1579
  • [26] T-LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION FOLLOWING BURNS - DEPENDENCE OF RESPONSE ON ANTIGENIC DISPARITY AND SIZE OF INJURY
    MUNSTER, AM
    GRESSITT, SE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1973, 143 (01): : 106 - 108
  • [27] Immunodominance of low molecular weight secretory polypeptides of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to induce cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response
    Sable, SB
    Kaur, S
    Verma, I
    Khuller, GK
    VACCINE, 2005, 23 (41) : 4947 - 4954
  • [28] Effector HIV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity in long-term nonprogressors: Associations with viral replication and progression
    Keoshkerian, E
    Ashton, LJ
    Smith, DG
    Ziegler, JB
    Kaldor, JM
    Cooper, DA
    Stewart, GJ
    Ffrench, RA
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2003, 71 (04) : 483 - 491
  • [29] Houdini's box: towards an understanding of AIDS virus escape from the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response
    O'Connor, DH
    Watkins, DI
    IMMUNOGENETICS, 1999, 50 (3-4) : 237 - 241
  • [30] OLIGOPEPTIDE INDUCTION OF A CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSE TO HER-2/NEU PROTOONCOGENE IN-VITRO
    FISK, B
    CHESAK, B
    POLLACK, MS
    WHARTON, JT
    IOANNIDES, CG
    CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 157 (02) : 415 - 427