Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens

被引:71
|
作者
Wolc, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arango, Jesus [5 ]
Settar, Petek [5 ]
Fulton, Janet E. [5 ]
O'Sullivan, Neil P. [5 ]
Preisinger, Rudolf [4 ]
Habier, David [2 ,3 ]
Fernando, Rohan [2 ,3 ]
Garrick, Dorian J. [2 ,3 ]
Dekkers, Jack C. M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, PL-60637 Poznan, Poland
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ctr Integrated Anim Genom, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH, D-27472 Cuxhaven, Germany
[5] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, IA 50063 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; SELECTION; PREDICTION; IMPACT; TRAITS; CATTLE; BULLS;
D O I
10.1186/1297-9686-43-23
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: The predictive ability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) originates both from associations between high-density markers and QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) and from pedigree information. Thus, GEBV are expected to provide more persistent accuracy over successive generations than breeding values estimated using pedigree-based methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of GEBV in a closed population of layer chickens and to quantify their persistence over five successive generations using marker or pedigree information. Methods: The training data consisted of 16 traits and 777 genotyped animals from two generations of a brown-egg layer breeding line, 295 of which had individual phenotype records, while others had phenotypes on 2,738 non-genotyped relatives, or similar data accumulated over up to five generations. Validation data included phenotyped and genotyped birds from five subsequent generations (on average 306 birds/generation). Birds were genotyped for 23,356 segregating SNP. Animal models using genomic or pedigree relationship matrices and Bayesian model averaging methods were used for training analyses. Accuracy was evaluated as the correlation between EBV and phenotype in validation divided by the square root of trait heritability. Results: Pedigree relationships in outbred populations are reduced by 50% at each meiosis, therefore accuracy is expected to decrease by the square root of 0.5 every generation, as observed for pedigree-based EBV (Estimated Breeding Values). In contrast the GEBV accuracy was more persistent, although the drop in accuracy was substantial in the first generation. Traits that were considered to be influenced by fewer QTL and to have a higher heritability maintained a higher GEBV accuracy over generations. In conclusion, GEBV capture information beyond pedigree relationships, but retraining every generation is recommended for genomic selection in closed breeding populations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic genotyping of groups of cows to improve genomic estimated breeding values of selection candidates
    Laura Plieschke
    Christian Edel
    Eduardo C. G. Pimentel
    Reiner Emmerling
    Jörn Bennewitz
    Kay-Uwe Götz
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 48
  • [42] USING ONLY LOW-DENSITY MARKER PANELS FOR GENOMIC SELECTION CAN LEAD TO DECLINING GENOMIC ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUE ACCURACY OVER TIME
    Delomas, Thomas A.
    Hollenbeck, Christopher M.
    Matt, Joseph L.
    Thompson, Neil F.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2023, 42 : 75 - 75
  • [43] Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits
    Boerner, V.
    Johnston, D.
    Wu, X. -L.
    Bauck, S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (02) : 513 - 521
  • [44] Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Bowman, Phillip J.
    Chamberlain, Amanda C.
    Verbyla, Klara
    Goddard, Mike E.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2009, 41
  • [45] Effect of prior distributions on accuracy of genomic breeding values for two dairy traits
    Nicolazzi, Ezequiel L.
    Negrini, Riccardo
    Chamberlain, Amanda J.
    Goddard, Michael E.
    Marsan, Paolo Ajmone
    Hayes, Ben J.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 12 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [46] Practical approximation of accuracy in genomic breeding values for a large number of genotyped animals
    Tsuruta, S.
    Lourenco, D.
    Masuda, Y.
    Moser, D. W.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 162 - 162
  • [47] Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle
    Mujibi, F. D. N.
    Nkrumah, J. D.
    Durunna, O. N.
    Stothard, P.
    Mah, J.
    Wang, Z.
    Basarab, J.
    Plastow, G.
    Crews, D. H., Jr.
    Moore, S. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (11) : 3353 - 3361
  • [48] Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations
    Ben J Hayes
    Phillip J Bowman
    Amanda C Chamberlain
    Klara Verbyla
    Mike E Goddard
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 41
  • [49] Use of Genomic Estimated Breeding Values Results in Rapid Genetic Gains for Drought Tolerance in Maize
    Vivek, B. S.
    Krishna, Girish Kumar
    Vengadessan, V.
    Babu, R.
    Zaidi, P. H.
    Le Quy Kha
    Mandal, S. S.
    Grudloyma, P.
    Takalkar, S.
    Krothapalli, K.
    Singh, I. S.
    Ocampo, Eureka Teresa M.
    Xingming, F.
    Burgueno, J.
    Azrai, M.
    Singh, R. P.
    Crossa, J.
    PLANT GENOME, 2017, 10 (01):
  • [50] Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values estimated in dairy cattle with a principal component approach.
    Macciotta, N. P. P.
    Pintus, M. A.
    Steri, R.
    Pieramati, C.
    Nicolazzi, E. L.
    Santus, E.
    Vicario, D.
    van Kaam, J. T.
    Nardone, A.
    Valentini, A.
    Ajmone-Marsan, P.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 532 - 533