Sub-grid-scale parameterisations for large-scale eddy simulations

被引:0
|
作者
Frederiksen, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Div Atmospher Res, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
PLASMA PHYSICS | 2003年 / 669卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The accuracy of simulations of turbulent flows is strongly dependent on the appropriate treatment of subgrid-scale processes that cannot be explicitly resolved at the finite resolutions of the simulations. Subgrid-scale parameterizations of eddy viscosity, stochastic backscatter and net eddy viscosity are formulated for two-dimensional turbulence. based on eddy damped quasi-normal Markovian (EDQNM) and direct interaction approximation closures. The focus of the study is geophysical flows described by the barotropic vorticity equation but the results should also be relevant to the low frequency drift wave dynamics of magnetized plasmas described by the Hasegawa-Mima equation. The subgrid scale parameterizations are found to have a cusp behaviour at the cutoff wavenumber where they have their largest magnitudes. The conventional net eddy viscosity is shown to be the relatively small difference between the eddy drain viscosity and the backscatter viscosity. Large-eddy simulations (LES) with the barotropic vorticity equation have been performed incorporating these dynamic sub-grid scale 7 parameterizations and compared with higher-resolution direct numerical simulations (DNS), which are regarded as the benchmark or "truth" for comparisons. Good comparisons are found between kinetic energy spectra for the LES and DNS at the scales of the LES for both nonrotating two-dimensional turbulence and differentially rotating Rossby wave (drift wave) turbulence. This is contrasted with much poorer comparisons when using a number of ad hoc eddy viscosity parameterizations is LES. The applications of the results to more complex circulations models is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 690
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Large-scale network simulations with GTNets
    Riley, GR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 676 - 684
  • [42] Large-scale rigid body simulations
    Iglberger, Klaus
    Ruede, Ulrich
    [J]. MULTIBODY SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2011, 25 (01) : 81 - 95
  • [43] Techniques for Maintaining Situational Awareness During Large-Scale Electric Grid Simulations
    Overbye, Thomas J.
    Shetye, Komal S.
    Wert, Jess
    Trinh, Wei
    Birchfield, Adam
    Rolstad, Tracy
    Weber, James D.
    [J]. 2021 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE AT ILLINOIS (PECI), 2021,
  • [44] Large-scale hybrid simulations of reconnection
    Krauss-Varban, D.
    Karimabadi, H.
    [J]. Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows: Astronum-2006, 2006, 359 : 264 - 269
  • [45] LARGE-SCALE NATURAL VISION SIMULATIONS
    LOURENS, T
    PETKOV, N
    KRUIZINGA, P
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 1994, 10 (2-3) : 351 - 358
  • [46] Fidelity in visualizing large-scale simulations
    Popescu, V
    Hoffmann, C
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2005, 37 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [47] Design of large-scale parallel simulations
    Knepley, MG
    Sameh, AH
    Sarin, V
    [J]. PARALLEL COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS: TOWARDS TERAFLOPS, OPTIMIZATION, AND NOVEL FORMULATIONS, 2000, : 273 - 279
  • [48] Large-scale rigid body simulations
    Klaus Iglberger
    Ulrich Rüde
    [J]. Multibody System Dynamics, 2011, 25 : 81 - 95
  • [49] The technology of large-scale CFD simulations
    Gorobets A.V.
    [J]. Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 2016, 8 (6) : 660 - 670
  • [50] Evaluating large-scale training simulations
    Simpson, H
    Oser, RL
    [J]. MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 15 (01) : 25 - 40