3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems

被引:24
|
作者
Anderson, L. A. [1 ]
Christie, M. [1 ]
Blackburn, B. E. [1 ]
Mahan, C. [1 ]
Earl, C. [1 ]
Pelt, C. E. [1 ]
Peters, C. L. [1 ]
Gililland, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 06期
关键词
TIBIAL BONE LOSS; DEFECTS; OUTCOMES; SLEEVES; SURVIVORSHIP; COMPONENTS; ALLOGRAFT;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2504.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Porous metaphyseal cones can be used for fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and complex TKAs. This metaphyseal fixation has led to some surgeons using shorter cemented stems instead of diaphyseal engaging cementless stems with a potential benefit of ease of obtaining proper alignment without being beholden to the diaphysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of TKA cases performed using 3D-printed metaphyseal cones. Methods A retrospective review of 86 rTKAs and nine complex primary TKAs, with an average age of 63.2 years (SD 8.2) and BMI of 34.0 kg/m(2) (SD 8.7), in which metaphyseal cones were used for both femoral and tibial fixation were compared for their knee alignment based on the type of stem used. Overall, 22 knees had cementless stems on both sides, 52 had cemented stems on both sides, and 15 had mixed stems. Postoperative long-standing radiographs were evaluated for coronal and sagittal plane alignment. Adjusted logistic regression models were run to assess malalignment hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment beyond +/- 3 degrees and sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components +/- 3 degrees by stem type. Results No patients had a revision of a cone due to aseptic loosening; however, two had revision surgery due to infection. In all, 26 (27%) patients had HKA malalignment; nine (9.5%) patients had sagittal plane malalignment, five (5.6%) of the tibia, and four (10.8%) of the femur. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, there was a significantly increased risk for malalignment when a cone was used and both the femur and tibia had cementless compared to cemented stems (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.05). Conclusion Porous 3D-printed cones provide excellent metaphyseal fixation. However, these central cones make the use of offset couplers difficult and may generate malalignment with cementless stems. We found 3.19-times higher odds of malalignment in our TKAs performed with metaphyseal cones and both femoral and tibial cementless stems.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 157
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems
    Shannon, BD
    Klassen, JF
    Rand, JA
    Berry, DJ
    Trousdale, RT
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (07): : 27 - 32
  • [22] The Use of Metaphyseal Cones for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Foreword
    Khlopas, Anton
    Chughtai, Morad
    Elmallah, Randa K.
    Harwin, Steven F.
    Gwam, Chukwuweike U.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (08) : 613 - 613
  • [23] The Cost-Effectiveness of Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Serino, Joseph, III
    Burnett, Robert A., III
    Boniello, Anthony J.
    Yang, JaeWon
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06): : S50 - S55
  • [24] Highly Porous Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series
    Patel, Nirav K.
    Kim, Eric G.
    Chughtai, Morad
    Khlopas, Anton
    Elmallah, Randa D. K.
    Harwin, Steven F.
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (08) : 614 - 620
  • [25] CEMENTLESS REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
    WHITESIDE, LA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1993, (286) : 160 - 167
  • [26] Cementless Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Large Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Alexander, Gerald E.
    Bernasek, Thomas L.
    Crank, Richard L.
    Haidukewych, George J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (04): : 604 - 607
  • [27] Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Hannon, Charles P.
    Salih, Rondek
    Barrack, Robert L.
    Nunley, Ryan M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (18): : 1430 - 1434
  • [28] Stacked Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Reconstruction of Large Tibial Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty
    Emenari, Chijindu
    Edmond, Tyler
    Nandi, Sumon
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 12 : 12 - 16
  • [29] Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Hampp, Emily L.
    Shi, Sarah
    Bhowmik-Stoker, Manoshi
    Huffman, Nickelas
    Denehy, Kevin M.
    Markel, David C.
    Li, Daniel D.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (11) : 765 - 772
  • [30] Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Brown, Nicholas M.
    McDowell, Mitchell A.
    Levine, Brett R.
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (01): : 171 - 177