3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems

被引:24
|
作者
Anderson, L. A. [1 ]
Christie, M. [1 ]
Blackburn, B. E. [1 ]
Mahan, C. [1 ]
Earl, C. [1 ]
Pelt, C. E. [1 ]
Peters, C. L. [1 ]
Gililland, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 06期
关键词
TIBIAL BONE LOSS; DEFECTS; OUTCOMES; SLEEVES; SURVIVORSHIP; COMPONENTS; ALLOGRAFT;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2504.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Porous metaphyseal cones can be used for fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and complex TKAs. This metaphyseal fixation has led to some surgeons using shorter cemented stems instead of diaphyseal engaging cementless stems with a potential benefit of ease of obtaining proper alignment without being beholden to the diaphysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of TKA cases performed using 3D-printed metaphyseal cones. Methods A retrospective review of 86 rTKAs and nine complex primary TKAs, with an average age of 63.2 years (SD 8.2) and BMI of 34.0 kg/m(2) (SD 8.7), in which metaphyseal cones were used for both femoral and tibial fixation were compared for their knee alignment based on the type of stem used. Overall, 22 knees had cementless stems on both sides, 52 had cemented stems on both sides, and 15 had mixed stems. Postoperative long-standing radiographs were evaluated for coronal and sagittal plane alignment. Adjusted logistic regression models were run to assess malalignment hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment beyond +/- 3 degrees and sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components +/- 3 degrees by stem type. Results No patients had a revision of a cone due to aseptic loosening; however, two had revision surgery due to infection. In all, 26 (27%) patients had HKA malalignment; nine (9.5%) patients had sagittal plane malalignment, five (5.6%) of the tibia, and four (10.8%) of the femur. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, there was a significantly increased risk for malalignment when a cone was used and both the femur and tibia had cementless compared to cemented stems (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.05). Conclusion Porous 3D-printed cones provide excellent metaphyseal fixation. However, these central cones make the use of offset couplers difficult and may generate malalignment with cementless stems. We found 3.19-times higher odds of malalignment in our TKAs performed with metaphyseal cones and both femoral and tibial cementless stems.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 157
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Remily, Ethan A.
    Castrodad, Iciar M. Davila
    Mohamed, Nequesha S.
    Wilkie, Wayne A.
    Kelemen, Margaret N.
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 44 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [2] 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
    Carender, Christopher N.
    Bothun, Cole E.
    Taunton, Michael J.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    Pagnano, Mark W.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (18): : 1688 - 1696
  • [3] Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Mancino, Fabio
    Di Matteo, Vincenzo
    Mocini, Fabrizio
    Pietramala, Silvia
    Singlitico, Alessandro
    De Fazio, Andrea
    La Vergata, Vincenzo
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    Maccauro, Giulio
    De Martino, Ivan
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [4] Metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty THE ROLE OF STEMS
    Xie, S.
    Conlisk, N.
    Hamilton, D.
    Scott, C.
    Burnett, R.
    Pankaj, P.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (04): : 162 - 172
  • [5] Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Behery, Omar A.
    Shing, Elaine Z.
    Yu, Ziqing
    Springer, Bryan D.
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    Otero, Jesse E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (02): : 330 - 335
  • [6] Cemented versus Cementless Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Driesman, Adam S.
    Macaulay, William
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08) : 704 - 709
  • [7] Continued Stabilization of a Cementless 3D-Printed Total Knee Arthroplasty
    van der Lelij, Thies J. N.
    van de Mheen, Perla J.
    Kaptein, Bart L.
    Toksvig-Larsen, Soren
    Nelissen, Rob G. H. H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (21): : 1686 - 1694
  • [8] Utilizing 3d-printed patient-specific porous titanium cones in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty
    Vaziri, Arash Sharafat
    Moradkhani, Ghazaleh
    Farahmand, Farzam
    Karimpour, Morad
    Tahmasebi, Mohammad Naghi
    Vosoughi, Fardis
    Salimi, Maryam
    Shayan-Moghadam, Ramin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01):
  • [9] Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Batinica, Bruno
    Bolam, Scott M.
    D'Arcy, Matt
    Zhu, Mark
    Monk, A. Paul
    Munro, Jacob T.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (09) : 2254 - 2260
  • [10] Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Faizan, Ahmad
    Bhowmik-Stoker, Manoshi
    Alipit, Vincent
    Kirk, Amanda E.
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Harwin, Steven F.
    Meneghini, R. Michael
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (06): : 1946 - 1953