Unambiguous discrimination among oracle operators

被引:35
|
作者
Chefles, Anthony
Kitagawa, Akira
Takeoka, Masahiro
Sasaki, Masahide
Twamley, Jason
机构
[1] Hewlett Packard Labs, Quantum Informat Proc Grp, Bristol BS34 8QZ, Avon, England
[2] Natl Inst Informat & Commun Technol NICT, Tokyo 1848795, Japan
[3] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, CREST, Tokyo 1030028, Japan
[4] Ritsumeikan Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Dept Photon, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan
[5] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Comp Quantum Technol, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1751-8113/40/33/016
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
We address the problem of unambiguous discrimination among oracle operators. The general theory of unambiguous discrimination among unitary operators is extended with this application in mind. We prove that entanglement with an ancilla cannot assist any discrimination strategy for commuting unitary operators. We also obtain a simple, practical test for the unambiguous distinguishability of an arbitrary set of unitary operators on a given system. Using this result, we prove that the unambiguous distinguishability criterion is the same for both standard and minimal oracle operators. We then show that, except in certain trivial cases, unambiguous discrimination among all standard oracle operators corresponding to integer functions with fixed domain and range is impossible. However, we find that it is possible to unambiguously discriminate among the Grover oracle operators corresponding to an arbitrarily large unsorted database. The unambiguous distinguishability of standard oracle operators corresponding to totally indistinguishable functions, which possess a strong form of classical indistinguishability, is analysed. We prove that these operators are not unambiguously distinguishable for any finite set of totally indistinguishable functions on a Boolean domain and with arbitrary fixed range. Sets of such functions on a larger domain can have unambiguously distinguishable standard oracle operators, and we provide a complete analysis of the simplest case, that of four functions. We also examine the possibility of unambiguous oracle operator discrimination with multiple parallel calls and investigate an intriguing unitary superoperator transformation between standard and entanglement-assisted minimal oracle operators.
引用
收藏
页码:10183 / 10213
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unambiguous state discrimination in high dimensions
    S. Franke-Arnold
    J. Jeffers
    The European Physical Journal D, 2012, 66
  • [22] Unambiguous discrimination of general quantum operations
    Cai, Weizhou
    Zhang, Jing-Ning
    Hua, Ziyue
    Wang, Weiting
    Pan, Xiaoxuan
    Liu, Xinyu
    Ma, Yuwei
    Hu, Ling
    Mu, Xianghao
    Wang, Haiyan
    Song, Yipu
    Zou, Chang-Ling
    Sun, Luyan
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2024, 10 (46):
  • [23] One-photon interferometer for realizing optimal unambiguous discrimination among quantum subsets
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Yu, Shaolan
    Zhou, Tao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 79 (05):
  • [24] Local unambiguous discrimination of symmetric ternary states
    Nakahira, Kenji
    Kato, Kentaro
    Usuda, Tsuyoshi Sasaki
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (02)
  • [25] Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous state discrimination
    Clarke, RBM
    Chefles, A
    Barnett, SM
    Riis, E
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 63 (04): : 1 - 4
  • [26] Unambiguous discrimination between mixed quantum states
    Feng, YA
    Duan, RY
    Ying, MS
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2004, 70 (01): : 012308 - 1
  • [27] Unambiguous State Discrimination in Quantum Key Distribution
    Howard E. Brandt
    Quantum Information Processing, 2005, 4 : 387 - 398
  • [28] Lower bound on inconclusive probability of unambiguous discrimination
    Feng, Yuan
    Zhang, Shengyu
    Duan, Runyao
    Ying, Mingsheng
    Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2002, 66 (06): : 623131 - 623134
  • [29] Quantum tomography via unambiguous state discrimination
    Salazar, R.
    Delgado, A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2012, 86 (01):
  • [30] Unambiguous state discrimination in quantum key distribution
    Brandt, Howard E.
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2005, 4 (05) : 387 - 398