Comparison between discrete dipole implementations and exact techniques

被引:130
|
作者
Penttila, Antti [1 ]
Zubko, Evgenij [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lumme, Kari [1 ]
Muinonen, Karri [1 ]
Yurkin, Maxim A. [4 ,5 ]
Draine, Bruce [6 ]
Rahola, Jussi [7 ]
Hoekstra, Alfons G. [4 ]
Shkuratov, Yuri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Kharkov Natl Univ, Astron Inst, UA-61022 Kharkov, Ukraine
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Inst Low Temp Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600819, Japan
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Sci, Sect Computat Sci, NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Chem Kinet & Combust, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[6] Princeton Univ, Dept Astrophys Sci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[7] Simulintu Oy, Espoo, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
scattering; discrete-dipole approximation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.026
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The use of the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) method in wave optical scattering simulations is growing quite fast. This is due to the fact that the current computing resources allow to apply DDA to sufficiently large scattering systems. The advantage of DDA is that it is applicable to arbitrary particle shape and configuration of particles. There are several computer implementations of the DDA method, and in this article we will compare four of such implementations in terms of their accuracy, speed and usability. The accuracy is studied by comparing the DDA results against results from either Mie, T-matrix or cluster T-Matrix codes with suitable geometries. It is found that the relative accuracy for intensity is between 2% and 6% for ice and silicate type refractive indices and the absolute accuracy for linear polarization ratio is roughly from 1% to 3%. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 436
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparison between SAT and CSP Techniques
    Hachemi Bennaceur
    Constraints, 2004, 9 : 123 - 138
  • [42] Comparison between techniques of prenatal diagnosis
    Arcidiacono, F.
    Gianninoto, A.
    Sciascia, L.
    Carastro, D.
    Cardea, C.
    Biondo, L.
    Carastro, H.
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 2006, 28 (09): : 448 - 461
  • [43] Comparison between innovative techniques of photogrammetry
    Barrile, Vincenzo
    Bilotta, Giuliana
    Pozzoli, Alice
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 9
  • [44] A comparison between SAT and CSP techniques
    Bennaceur, H
    CONSTRAINTS, 2004, 9 (02) : 123 - 138
  • [45] A Comparison of the Scalability of OpenMP Implementations
    Jammer, Tim
    Iwainsky, Christian
    Bischof, Christian
    EURO-PAR 2020: PARALLEL PROCESSING, 2020, 12247 : 83 - 97
  • [46] An empirical comparison of CORBA implementations
    Eggen, RE
    Grant, IK
    7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2003, : 338 - 343
  • [47] Detection of preexisting quantum entanglements between dipole-photon discrete observables
    Porcelli, Elio B. B.
    Alves, Omar R. R.
    Filho, Victo S. S.
    OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, 2023, 55 (11)
  • [48] Comparison of different implementations of MFCC
    Zheng, F
    Zhang, GL
    Song, ZJ
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 16 (06) : 582 - 589
  • [49] Comparison of different implementations of MFCC
    Fang Zheng
    Guoliang Zhang
    Zhanjiang Song
    Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2001, 16 : 582 - 589
  • [50] A comparison of three MPI implementations
    Vinter, B
    Bjorndalen, JM
    Anshus, OJ
    Larsen, T
    COMMUNICATING PROCESS ARCHITECTURES 2004, 2004, 62 : 127 - 136