Training Providers in Shared Decision Making for Trauma Treatment Planning

被引:7
|
作者
Etingen, Bella [1 ]
Hessinger, Jonathan D. [2 ]
Hunley, Holly A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Edward Hines Jr Vet Hlth Adm Hosp, Ctr Innovat Complex Chron Healthcare CINCCH, 5000 South 5th Ave 151H, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[2] Edward Hines Jr Vet Hlth Adm Hosp, Trauma Serv Program TSP, Mental Hlth Serv Line 116B, Hines, IL USA
关键词
posttraumatic stress disorder; shared decision making; patient preferences; mental health care; veterans; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT; SATISFACTION; PERSPECTIVES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000511
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)/Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Acute Stress Disorder strives to advance the VA's practice of recovery-oriented, evidence-based, patient-centered care (PCC) for veterans with PTSD. A core foundation of PCC is that care is individually tailored to meet the needs and preferences of each patient. Accordingly, the 2017 update to the CPG specifically recommends the use of shared decision making (SDM), an individualized collaborative approach to treatment planning, in the PTSD treatment planning process. Although SDM has been promoted by the CPG throughout the VA and SDM training is being developed, no systemic training was available at the time the guidelines were updated. Additionally, while early research has studied the impact and experience of SDM for the patient, no work has explored provider experiences with SDM for those who work with trauma populations. This project bridges this gap by examining survey data collected 6 months following a formal SDM training to staff and trainees working with veterans who have experienced trauma within a trauma clinic at a large VA hospital. After the training, clinicians understood SDM and were engaging in SDM with their patients. Patients indicated that they were satisfied with and felt like an active participant in the treatment planning process. Clinician assumptions about the SDM process and barriers to SDM shown in previous research were also demonstrated. Implications for future research and practice, such as using decision aids in PTSD treatment planning and targeting clinician beliefs about SDM, are discussed. Impact Statement Recent PTSD clinical practice guidelines recommend engaging patients in SDM, however, research on SDM for PTSD treatment planning is lacking. We found that provider-facing SDM training promotes understanding and use of SDM among PTSD care team members, and patients are satisfied with the incorporation of SDM into PTSD treatment planning. Further development of provider-facing SDM training for PTSD care, such as the virtual training VA recently rolled, is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consumer preferences regarding shared decision-making with health care providers
    Weinstein, M
    Hyjurick, S
    Flanigan, E
    Bohrer, F
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2004, 44 : 432 - 432
  • [22] Are Providers Prepared to Engage Younger Women in Shared Decision-Making for Mammography?
    Martinez, Kathryn A.
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Ruff, Allison L.
    Bolen, Shari D.
    Teng, Kathryn
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 27 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [23] Is training in shared decision making in undergraduate medical education adequate?
    Clever, SL
    Price, EG
    Windish, DM
    Magaziner, JL
    Thomas, PA
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 : 172 - 172
  • [24] A training simulation for practicing shared decision making for older patients
    Pel-Littel, Ruth
    van Zeijts, Henk
    Schram, Nadine
    Nap, Henk Herman
    Jeuring, Johan
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING UBIQUITOUS SYSTEMS AND PERVASIVE NETWORKS (EUSPN-2018) / 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT AND FUTURE TRENDS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTHCARE (ICTH-2018), 2018, 141 : 287 - 293
  • [25] Applying shared decision-making to screening for trauma and adversity in youth
    Musicaro, Regina M.
    Langer, David A.
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2022, 131
  • [26] The Impact of a Shared Decision-Making Training Program on Dementia Care Planning in Long-Term Care
    Mariani, Elena
    Chattat, Rabih
    Ottoboni, Giovanni
    Koopmans, Raymond
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
    Engels, Yvonne
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2018, 64 (04) : 1123 - 1135
  • [27] Post-training Shared Decision Making Barriers and Facilitators for Pediatric Healthcare Providers: updates A Mixed-Methods Study
    Boland, Laura
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Legere, France
    Dorrance, Kristin
    Shephard, Allyson
    Stacey, Dawn
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2019, 19 (01) : 118 - 129
  • [28] Oncology Nursing and Shared Decision Making for Cancer Treatment
    Tariman, Joseph D.
    Mehmeti, Enisa
    Spawn, Nadia
    McCarter, Sarah P.
    Bishop-Royse, Jessica
    Garcia, Ima
    Hartle, Lisa
    Szubski, Katharine
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 (05) : 560 - 563
  • [29] Shared Decision Making and Treatment for Minority Children With ADHD
    Hinojosa, Melanie Sberna
    Hinojosa, Ramon
    Nguyen, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF TRANSCULTURAL NURSING, 2020, 31 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [30] Development of a Shared Decision Making Tool for Osteoporosis Treatment
    Kiwalkar, Sonam
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68