Comparison of Enhancement Patterns of Histologically Confirmed Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between Gadoxetate- and Ferucarbotran-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:34
|
作者
Okada, Masahiro [1 ]
Imai, Yasuharu [2 ]
Kim, Tonsok [3 ]
Kogita, Sachiyo [2 ]
Takamura, Manabu [4 ]
Kumano, Seishi [1 ]
Onishi, Hiromitsu [3 ]
Hori, Masatoshi [3 ]
Fukuda, Kazuto [2 ]
Hayashi, Norio [5 ]
Wakasa, Kenichi [6 ]
Sakamoto, Michiie [7 ]
Murakami, Takamichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kinki Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Ikeda Municipal Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Osaka, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[4] Ikeda Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Osaka, Japan
[5] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Osaka, Japan
[6] Osaka City Univ, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Grad Sch Med, Osaka 558, Japan
[7] Keio Univ Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; gadoxetate; ferucarbotran; hepatocyte; Kupffer cell; GD-EOB-DTPA; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON-OXIDE; MR CONTRAST AGENT; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; HELICAL CT; PARTICLES; IMAGES; DIAGNOSIS; RESOVIST; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22333
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare enhancenent patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and dysplastic nodule (DN) between gadoxetate- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI. Materials and Methods: Patients recruited from ultrasound surveillance for HCC in chronic liver diseases were enrolled in this prospective study approved by institutional review board. Thirty-six patients with 37 histologically proven HCC, including 22 well-differentiated HCCs (wHCC), 15 moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs (mpHCCs), and 4 DNs, underwent gadoxetate-enhanced and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI. We compared hepatobiliary phase image of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI with ferucarbotran-enhanced MR image regarding signal intensity of HCC and DN relative to surrounding liver parenchyma. We calculated contrast ratios between tumor and liver on pre-enhancement, hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI. Results: On ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI, all mpHCCs showed hyper-intensity, while 14 wHCCs (14/22; 63%) showed iso-intensity. On hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, 13 mpHCCs (13/15; 86%) and 20 wHCCs (20/22; 91%) showed hypo-intensity. Two DNs and the other two showed iso- and hypo-intensity, respectively, on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, whereas all DNs revealed iso-intensity on ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI. Gadoxetate-postcontrast ratio was significantly lower than ferucarbotran-postcontrast ratio in wHCC (P = 0.015). Conclusion: The uptake function of hepatocytes that are targeted by gadoxetate is more sensitive than that of Kupffer cells targeted by ferucarbotran in stepwise hepatocarcinogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 913
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Detection of focal fiver lesions in unenhanced and ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of T2-weighted breath-hold and respiratory-triggered sequences
    Rief, Matthias
    Wagner, Moritz
    Franiel, Tobias
    Bresan, Viola
    Taupitz, Matthias
    Klessen, Christian
    Hamm, Bernd
    Asbach, Patrick
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (09) : 1223 - 1229
  • [23] LI-RADS version 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Choi, Se Jin
    Choi, Won-Mook
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (08) : 5792 - 5800
  • [24] Pseudolesion of the liver observed on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging obtained shortly after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yoshinobu Shinagawa
    Keiko Sakamoto
    Ritsuko Fujimitsu
    Mikiko Ida
    Hiroshi Urakawa
    Shin-ichi Kora
    Hideyuki Higashihara
    Kouichi Takano
    Kengo Yoshimitsu
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2010, 28 : 483 - 488
  • [25] Preoperative prediction of glypican-3 positive expression in solitary hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate-disodium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Chen, Yidi
    Qin, Yun
    Wu, Yuanan
    Wei, Hong
    Wei, Yi
    Zhang, Zhen
    Duan, Ting
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Song, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [26] Adding ancillary features to enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnostic performance
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Young Kon
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    Lee, Won Jae
    Ha, Sang Yun
    Ahn, Soohyun
    Kim, Min-Ji
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (09) : 2309 - 2320
  • [27] The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarinoma
    Lu, Lun
    Zhang, ChenCai
    Yu, Xian
    Zhang, Ling
    Feng, YaYuan
    Wu, YuXian
    Xia, JinJu
    Chen, Xue
    Zhang, RuiPing
    Zhang, Juan
    Jia, Ningyang
    Zhang, SiSi
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [28] Adding ancillary features to enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnostic performance
    Ji Hye Min
    Young Kon Kim
    Dong Hyun Sinn
    Seo-Youn Choi
    Woo Kyoung Jeong
    Won Jae Lee
    Sang Yun Ha
    Soohyun Ahn
    Min-Ji Kim
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 2309 - 2320
  • [29] Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surveillance tool for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with ultrasound
    Park, Hyo Jung
    Jang, Hye Young
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    An, Jihyun
    Lim, Young-Suk
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 (04) : 718 - 724
  • [30] Pseudolesion of the liver observed on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging obtained shortly after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shinagawa, Yoshinobu
    Sakamoto, Keiko
    Fujimitsu, Ritsuko
    Ida, Mikiko
    Urakawa, Hiroshi
    Kora, Shin-ichi
    Higashihara, Hideyuki
    Takano, Kouichi
    Yoshimitsu, Kengo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 483 - 488