Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial

被引:53
|
作者
Herman, Hadas Ganer [1 ]
Gluck, Ohad [1 ]
Keidar, Ran [1 ]
Kerner, Ram [1 ]
Kovo, Michal [1 ]
Levran, David [2 ,3 ]
Bar, Jacob [1 ]
Sagiv, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Holon, Israel
[2] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, In Vitro Fertilizat Unit, Holon, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
antimullerian hormone; cesarean delivery; salpingectomy; tubal ligation; ANTI-MULLERIAN-HORMONE; SERUM ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE; PROPHYLACTIC BILATERAL SALPINGECTOMY; OPPORTUNISTIC SALPINGECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; CANCER; RISK; WOMEN; COMPLICATIONS; OOPHORECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer is assumed to derive from the fallopian tube. Salpingectomy has been previously demonstrated to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, and may be used as a means of sterilization. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare short-term ovarian reserve and operative complications in cases of salpingectomy and tubal ligation during cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Study patients who underwent elective cesarean section at our institution and requested sterilization were randomized to bilateral salpingectomy or tubal ligation. Prior to surgery, blood samples were obtained for antimu "llerian hormone. Surgical course was noted, including overall time, complications, and postoperative hemoglobin. Repeat antimu "llerian hormone samples were obtained from patients 6-8 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: In all, 46 patients were recruited for participation, of whom 33 completed a follow-up visit, and for whom repeat antimu "llerian hormone levels were available. Patients in the salpingectomy group were slightly older (37.0 +/- 3.9 vs 34.3 +/- 4.1 years, P = .02). No differences were noted in patient parity, body mass index, or gestational age between the groups. Pregnancy and postdelivery antimu " llerian hormone levels were not significantly different between the groups, with an average increase of 0.58 +/- 0.98 vs 0.39 +/- 0.41 ng/mL in the salpingectomy and tubal ligation groups, respectively (P = .45). Surgeries including salpingectomy were longer by an average 13 minutes (66.0 +/- 20.5 vs 52.3 +/- 15.8 minutes, P = .01). No difference was demonstrated between the groups regarding surgical complications and postoperative hemoglobin decrease. CONCLUSION: Sterilization by salpingectomy appears to be as safe as tubal ligation regarding operative complications and subsequent ovarian reserve. As salpingectomy offers the advantage of cancer risk reduction, it may be offered in the settings of elective preplanned surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:472.e1 / 472.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of tubal ligation on ovarian reserve and the ovarian stromal blood supply
    Kelekci, S
    Yorgancioglu, Z
    Yilmaz, B
    Yasar, L
    Savan, K
    Sonmez, S
    Kart, C
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 44 (05): : 449 - 451
  • [22] Changes in the rate of tubal ligation done after cesarean section
    Moreno, JM
    Bartual, E
    Carmona, M
    Araico, F
    Miranda, JA
    Herruzo, AJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [23] The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Einerson, Brett D.
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Erickson, Britt K.
    Szychowski, Jeff
    Leath, Charles A., III
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Huh, Warner K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 152 (01) : 127 - 132
  • [24] Salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mills, Kerry
    Marchand, Greg
    Sainz, Katelyn
    Azadi, Ali
    Ware, Kelly
    Vallejo, Janelle
    Anderson, Sienna
    King, Alexa
    Osborn, Asya
    Ruther, Stacy
    Brazil, Giovanna
    Cieminski, Kaitlynne
    Hopewell, Sophia
    Rials, Lisa
    Klipp, Angela
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (03) : 258 - +
  • [25] Salpingectomy vs Tubal Ligation for Sterilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mills, Kerry
    Marchand, Greg
    Sainz, Katelyn
    Azadi, Ali
    Ware, Kelly
    Vallejo, Janelle
    Anderson, Sienna
    King, Alexa
    Osborn, Asya
    Ruther, Stacy
    Brazil, Giovanna
    Cieminski, Kaitlynne
    Hopewell, Sophia
    Rials, Lisa
    Klipp, Angela
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2021, 76 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [26] Continuous vs. interrupted subcutaneous suturing following cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
    Lauterbach, Roy
    Justman, Naphtali
    Hajaj, Areen
    Ben Zvi, Dikla
    Siegler, Yoav
    Farago, Naama
    Ghanim, Nadier
    Vitner, Dana
    Weiner, Zeev
    Ginsberg, Yuval
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S9 - S10
  • [27] Effect of Bilateral Salpingectomy versus Bilateral Tubal Ligation on Ovarian Reserve for Patients Seeking Permanent Sterilisation: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Medhi, Robin
    Boro, Rumen chandra
    Ahmed, Kafiluddin
    Dhar, Gautami
    Singh, Neha
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (12) : QC5 - QC9
  • [28] Longitudinal assessment of anti-Mullerian hormone after cesarean section and influence of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve
    Ida, Tsutomu
    Fujiwara, Hiroyuki
    Taniguchi, Yoshimi
    Kohyama, Akira
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 103 (06) : 394 - 399
  • [29] COMPARISON OF MORBIDITY IN CESAREAN-SECTION HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS CESAREAN-SECTION TUBAL-LIGATION
    BEY, MA
    PASTOREK, JG
    LU, PY
    GABERT, H
    LETELLIER, RL
    MILLER, JM
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1993, 177 (04): : 357 - 360
  • [30] STERILIZATION AT THE TIME OF CESAREAN-SECTION - TUBAL-LIGATION OR HYSTERECTOMY
    BUKOVSKY, I
    SCHNEIDER, D
    WEINRAUB, Z
    ARIELI, S
    SCHREYER, P
    CASPI, E
    CONTRACEPTION, 1983, 28 (04) : 349 - 356