Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial

被引:53
|
作者
Herman, Hadas Ganer [1 ]
Gluck, Ohad [1 ]
Keidar, Ran [1 ]
Kerner, Ram [1 ]
Kovo, Michal [1 ]
Levran, David [2 ,3 ]
Bar, Jacob [1 ]
Sagiv, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Holon, Israel
[2] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, In Vitro Fertilizat Unit, Holon, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
antimullerian hormone; cesarean delivery; salpingectomy; tubal ligation; ANTI-MULLERIAN-HORMONE; SERUM ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE; PROPHYLACTIC BILATERAL SALPINGECTOMY; OPPORTUNISTIC SALPINGECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; CANCER; RISK; WOMEN; COMPLICATIONS; OOPHORECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer is assumed to derive from the fallopian tube. Salpingectomy has been previously demonstrated to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, and may be used as a means of sterilization. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare short-term ovarian reserve and operative complications in cases of salpingectomy and tubal ligation during cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Study patients who underwent elective cesarean section at our institution and requested sterilization were randomized to bilateral salpingectomy or tubal ligation. Prior to surgery, blood samples were obtained for antimu "llerian hormone. Surgical course was noted, including overall time, complications, and postoperative hemoglobin. Repeat antimu "llerian hormone samples were obtained from patients 6-8 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: In all, 46 patients were recruited for participation, of whom 33 completed a follow-up visit, and for whom repeat antimu "llerian hormone levels were available. Patients in the salpingectomy group were slightly older (37.0 +/- 3.9 vs 34.3 +/- 4.1 years, P = .02). No differences were noted in patient parity, body mass index, or gestational age between the groups. Pregnancy and postdelivery antimu " llerian hormone levels were not significantly different between the groups, with an average increase of 0.58 +/- 0.98 vs 0.39 +/- 0.41 ng/mL in the salpingectomy and tubal ligation groups, respectively (P = .45). Surgeries including salpingectomy were longer by an average 13 minutes (66.0 +/- 20.5 vs 52.3 +/- 15.8 minutes, P = .01). No difference was demonstrated between the groups regarding surgical complications and postoperative hemoglobin decrease. CONCLUSION: Sterilization by salpingectomy appears to be as safe as tubal ligation regarding operative complications and subsequent ovarian reserve. As salpingectomy offers the advantage of cancer risk reduction, it may be offered in the settings of elective preplanned surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:472.e1 / 472.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section - safety and effect on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Herman, Hadas Ganer
    Gluk, Ohad
    Keidar, Ran
    Kerner, Ram
    Kovo, Michal
    Levran, David
    Bar, Jacob
    Sagiv, Ron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S26 - S26
  • [2] Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Garcia, Christine
    Moskowitz, Olivia M.
    Chisholm, Christian A.
    Duska, Linda R.
    Warren, Amy L.
    Lyons, Genevieve R.
    Pettit, Kate E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [3] Impact of Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Section on Ovarian Reserve and Menstrual Pattern
    Yilmaz, Fatma Yazici
    Yenigul, Nefise Nazli
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 66 (11-12) : 383 - 388
  • [4] A randomized controlled trial of salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Erickson, Britt K.
    Szychowski, Jeff
    Leath, Charles A.
    Biggio, JosephR.
    Huh, WarnerK.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S27 - S28
  • [5] OPPORTUNISTIC SALPINGECTOMY VS TUBAL LIGATION AT CESAREAN SECTION: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Toledo, Rafaela G. Germano
    Ogas, Thomas N. Bischoff
    Molisani, Julia T.
    Martin, Rafael R. H.
    Gei, Alfredo F.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (04) : E398 - E398
  • [6] Salpingectomy for tubal sterilization at cesarean section: no extra time and no extra bleeding compared with tubal ligation
    Ida, T.
    Fujiwara, H.
    Matsubara, S.
    Taniguchi, Y.
    Kohyama, A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06): : 879 - 881
  • [7] Bilateral salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization during a cesarean delivery
    Shinar, Shiri
    Ashwal, Eran
    Blecher, Yair
    Alpern, Sharon
    Amikam, Uri
    Many, Ariel
    Yogev, Yariv
    Hiersch, Liran
    Cohen, Aviad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S415 - S416
  • [8] Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Erickson, Britt K.
    Szychowski, Jeff
    Leath, Charles A.
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Huh, Warner K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [9] Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation during cesarean delivery
    Du, Yongming
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (05) : 1037 - 1038
  • [10] Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation during cesarean delivery
    Yongming Du
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 1037 - 1038