Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting

被引:24
|
作者
Kukafka, Rita [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fang, Jiaqi [1 ]
Vanegas, Alejandro [2 ]
Silverman, Thomas [2 ]
Crew, Katherine D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, 622 West 68th St,PH-20, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
Chemoprevention; Breast cancer; Decision support; Decision conflict; Risk communication; Decision aids; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; COMMUNITY CLINICS; TAMOXIFEN; PREVENTION; CONFLICT; BURDEN; REGRET; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDATION; RALOXIFENE;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-018-0716-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBreast cancer chemoprevention can reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, chemoprevention is underutilized in the primary care setting. We conducted a pilot study of decision support tools among high-risk women and their primary care providers (PCPs).MethodsThe intervention included a decision aid (DA) for high-risk women, RealRisks, and a provider-centered tool, Breast Cancer Risk Navigation (BNAV). Patients completed validated surveys at baseline, after RealRisks and after their PCP clinical encounter or at 6-months. Referral for high-risk consultation and chemoprevention uptake were assessed via the electronic health record. The primary endpoint was accuracy of breast cancer risk perception at 6-months.ResultsAmong 40 evaluable high-risk women, median age was 64.5years and median 5-year breast cancer risk was 2.19%. After exposure to RealRisks, patients demonstrated an improvement in accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (p=0.02), an increase in chemoprevention knowledge (p<0.01), and 24% expressed interest in taking chemoprevention. Three women had a high-risk referral, and no one initiated chemoprevention. Decisional conflict significantly increased from after exposure to RealRisks to after their clinical encounter or at 6-months (p<0.01). Accurate breast cancer risk perceptions improved and was sustained at 6-months or after clinical encounters. We discuss the side effect profile of chemoprevention and the care pathway when RealRisks was introduced to understand why patients experienced increased decision conflict.ConclusionFuture interventions should carefully link the use of a DA more proximally to the clinical encounter, investigate timed measurements of decision conflict and improve risk communication, shared decision making, and chemoprevention education for PCPs. Additional work remains to better understand the impact of decision aids targeting both patients and providers.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954900 November 4, 2016 Retrospectively registered.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Reimers, Laura L.
    Sivasubramanian, Parijatham S.
    Hershman, Dawn
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Greenlee, Heather
    Campbell, Julie
    Kalinsky, Kevin
    Maurer, Matthew
    Jayasena, Ramona
    Sandoval, Rossy
    Alvarez, Maria
    Crew, Katherine D.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (04): : 377 - 386
  • [22] Acceptance of Chemoprevention by Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
    Lane, Karen
    Hyunh, Kelly
    Smith, Edie
    Hsiang, David
    Butler, John
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : S180 - S180
  • [23] Promoting lung cancer screening of high-risk patients by primary care providers
    Colamonici, Marco
    Khouzam, Nader
    Dell, Catherine
    Auge-Bronersky, Kristin
    Pacheco, Esther
    Rubinstein, Israel
    Recht, Bradley
    [J]. CANCER, 2023, 129 (22) : 3574 - 3581
  • [24] Tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention: Low uptake by high-risk women after evaluation of a breast lump
    Taylor, R
    Taguchi, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (03) : 242 - 247
  • [25] Comparing Breast Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Use of Chemoprevention and Statins among Women with High-risk Breast Lesions
    Lawal, Kehinde O.
    Nilan, Luisa
    Amenta, Jacquelyn
    McGuinness, Julia E.
    Kukafka, Rita
    Crew, Katherine D.
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (12) : 661 - 667
  • [26] Uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention among high-risk women and those with ductal carcinoma in situ
    Sivasubramanian, P. S.
    Reimers, L. L.
    Greenlee, H.
    Terry, M. B.
    Hershman, D.
    Maurer, M.
    Kalinsky, K.
    Awad, D.
    Xiao, T.
    Sandoval, R.
    Alvarez, M.
    Quirarte, A.
    Campbell, J.
    Crew, K. D.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [27] Economic evaluation of chemoprevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen and raloxifene among high-risk women in Japan
    Kondo, M.
    Hoshi, S-L
    Toi, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (02) : 281 - 290
  • [28] Economic evaluation of chemoprevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen and raloxifene among high-risk women in Japan
    M Kondo
    S-L Hoshi
    M Toi
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2009, 100 : 281 - 290
  • [29] The Lack, Need, and Opportunities for Decision-Making and Informational Tools to Educate Primary-Care Physicians and Women about Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
    Ravdin, Peter M.
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (06) : 686 - 688
  • [30] The experience of women at high risk for breast cancer receiving chemoprevention
    Whisenant, Meagan
    Jones, Jessica Trevino
    Brassil, Kelly
    Williams, Loretta A.
    Ponce, Darcy
    Kamat, Sharvari
    Solis, Emily
    Maliackal, Ann
    Walters, Amie
    Warlick, Hannah
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 : S74 - S75