Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting

被引:24
|
作者
Kukafka, Rita [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fang, Jiaqi [1 ]
Vanegas, Alejandro [2 ]
Silverman, Thomas [2 ]
Crew, Katherine D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, 622 West 68th St,PH-20, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
Chemoprevention; Breast cancer; Decision support; Decision conflict; Risk communication; Decision aids; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; COMMUNITY CLINICS; TAMOXIFEN; PREVENTION; CONFLICT; BURDEN; REGRET; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDATION; RALOXIFENE;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-018-0716-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBreast cancer chemoprevention can reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, chemoprevention is underutilized in the primary care setting. We conducted a pilot study of decision support tools among high-risk women and their primary care providers (PCPs).MethodsThe intervention included a decision aid (DA) for high-risk women, RealRisks, and a provider-centered tool, Breast Cancer Risk Navigation (BNAV). Patients completed validated surveys at baseline, after RealRisks and after their PCP clinical encounter or at 6-months. Referral for high-risk consultation and chemoprevention uptake were assessed via the electronic health record. The primary endpoint was accuracy of breast cancer risk perception at 6-months.ResultsAmong 40 evaluable high-risk women, median age was 64.5years and median 5-year breast cancer risk was 2.19%. After exposure to RealRisks, patients demonstrated an improvement in accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (p=0.02), an increase in chemoprevention knowledge (p<0.01), and 24% expressed interest in taking chemoprevention. Three women had a high-risk referral, and no one initiated chemoprevention. Decisional conflict significantly increased from after exposure to RealRisks to after their clinical encounter or at 6-months (p<0.01). Accurate breast cancer risk perceptions improved and was sustained at 6-months or after clinical encounters. We discuss the side effect profile of chemoprevention and the care pathway when RealRisks was introduced to understand why patients experienced increased decision conflict.ConclusionFuture interventions should carefully link the use of a DA more proximally to the clinical encounter, investigate timed measurements of decision conflict and improve risk communication, shared decision making, and chemoprevention education for PCPs. Additional work remains to better understand the impact of decision aids targeting both patients and providers.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954900 November 4, 2016 Retrospectively registered.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting
    Rita Kukafka
    Jiaqi Fang
    Alejandro Vanegas
    Thomas Silverman
    Katherine D. Crew
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for high-risk women and primary care providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention
    Vanegas, Alejandro
    Vargas, Jennifer M.
    Kukafka, Rita
    Crew, Katherine D.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [3] Study protocol: Randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention
    Crew, Katherine D.
    Silverman, Thomas B.
    Vanegas, Alejandro
    Trivedi, Meghna S.
    Dimond, Jill
    Mata, Jennie
    Sin, Margaret
    Jones, Tarsha
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Tsai, Wei-Yann
    Kukafka, Rita
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 16
  • [5] Developing decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase chemoprevention informed choice and uptake: A retrospective translational science case study
    Pope, Leah G.
    Abedin, Zainab
    Crew, Katherine D.
    Kukafka, Rita
    Pincus, Harold Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [6] Identifying women at high-risk for breast cancer in the primary care setting
    Crew, K. D.
    Sivasubramanian, P. S.
    Aguirre, A. N.
    Smalletz, C.
    Ngan, M. C.
    Xiao, T.
    Kukafka, R.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [7] Primary Care Providers Underutilize Breast Screening MRI for High-Risk Women
    Amornsiripanitch, N.
    Ameri, S. M.
    Goldberg, R. J.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (04) : 489 - 494
  • [8] Implementing decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention in primary care.
    Telfort, Jersen
    Trivedi, Meghna S.
    Yi, Hae Seung
    Colbeth, Hilary
    Vanegas, Alejandro
    Vargas, Jennifer
    Sandoval, Rossy
    Wood, Jeffrey
    Dimond, Jill
    Finkelstein, Joseph
    Kukafka, Rita
    Crew, Katherine D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [9] Recruitment strategies for enrollment of high-risk women to a randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools to increase breast cancer chemoprevention
    Bhatkhande, Gauri
    Silverman, Thomas
    Mata, Jennie
    Guzman, Ashlee
    He, Ting
    Dimond, Jill
    Jones, Tarsha
    Kukafka, Rita
    Crew, Katherine
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [10] Randomized controlled trial of decision support tools for patients and providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention
    Crew, Katherine D.
    Bhatkhande, Gauri
    Silverman, Thomas
    Jones, Tarsha
    Mata, Jennie
    Guzman, Ashlee
    He, Ting
    Dimond, Jill
    Kukafka, Rita
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)