Pneumatic Retinopexy in Patients with Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Meeting PIVOT Trial Criteria

被引:15
|
作者
Juncal, Verena R. [1 ,2 ]
Bamakrid, Motaz [2 ]
Jin, Shicheng [3 ]
Paracha, Quratulain [2 ]
Kim, David T. Ta [1 ,2 ]
Marafon, Samara B. [1 ,2 ]
Francisconi, Carolina L. M. [4 ]
Muni, Rajeev H. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Unity Hlth Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Kensington Vis & Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA | 2021年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.oret.2020.07.022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify the proportion of patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) presenting to a retina practice that meet 'Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary RRD' (PIVOT) trial criteria and to assess anatomic and functional outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) in this population. Design: Retrospective consecutive case series. Participants: Patients with primary RRD treated between October 2009 and November 2017 at an academic vitreoretinal practice in Canada. Methods: Medical records of all cases >18 years old with primary RRD were reviewed and the proportion of patients meeting PIVOT criteria was determined. Patients that met PIVOT criteria who underwent PnR with a follow-up >3 months were included for further analysis. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the primary retinal reattachment rate at 12 months among patients meeting PIVOT criteria undergoing PnR. Results: A total of 1,091 patients were identified, of which 577 (52.9%) met PIVOT criteria. Of these, 482/577 (83.5%) underwent PnR, but 54/482 (11.2%) were excluded as these had been enrolled in the PIVOT trial, and another 40/482 (8.3%) were excluded due to short follow-up (<3 months). Therefore, data pertaining to 388 patients is included in our analysis. 79.4% (308/388), 78.2% (280/358), 76.5% (241/315) and 73.9% (178/241) of patients who followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, had primary anatomic reattachment. A total of 20.6% (80/388) of patients did not reattach with the initial PnR or re-detached in the early post-procedure period (3 months), 2.1% (8/388) of patients re-detached between 3-12 months, and 1.3% (5/388) re-detached after 1 year. Phakic lens status was the only significant predictor of PnR success at 12 months in a multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.006). Mean logMAR VA improved from 0.90 +/- 0.90 (Snellen 20/159) at baseline t 0.34 +/- 0.40 (Snellen 20/44) at 12 months (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Over 50% of patients presenting to an academic tertiary retina practice with primary RRD met PIVOT criteria and were eligible for PnR. Evidence from this study demonstrates a durable primary anatomic retinal reattachment rate with PnR in patients fulfilling PIVOT criteria, with similar results to those encountered in the PIVOT trial. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 269
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intravitreal expansile gas kinetics in pneumatic retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
    Toh, Steven
    Teh, Boon Lin
    Williamson, Tom H.
    Obara, Boguslaw
    Guillemaut, Jean-Yves
    Steel, David
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 51 (09): : 1019 - 1019
  • [42] Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial
    Muni, Rajeev H.
    Francisconi, Carolina L. M.
    Felfeli, Tina
    Mak, Michael Y. K.
    Berger, Alan R.
    Wong, David T.
    Altomare, Filiberto
    Giavedoni, Louis R.
    Kohly, Radha P.
    Kertes, Peter J.
    Figueiredo, Natalia
    Zuo, Fei
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Hillier, Roxane J.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 138 (08) : 826 - 833
  • [43] Outcomes of Pneumatic Retinopexy Performed by Vitreoretinal Fellows for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
    Emami-naeini, Parisa
    Vuong, Vivian S.
    Tran, Steven
    Morse, Lawrence S.
    Moshiri, Ala
    Park, Susanna S.
    Yiu, Glenn
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [44] Bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repaired with simultaneous bilateral pneumatic retinopexy
    Keimoglu, Hurkan
    Ozkagnici, Ahmet
    Okudan, Suleyman
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2009, 44 (02): : 210 - 210
  • [45] OUTCOMES OF RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR AFTER FAILED PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY
    Vidne-Hay, Orit
    Abumanhal, Muhammad
    Abd Elkader, Amir
    Fogel, Miri
    Moisseiev, Joseph
    Moisseiev, Elad
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2020, 40 (05): : 805 - 810
  • [46] Comparative study of vitrectomy, pneumatic retinopexy, and scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    BeltranLoustaunau, MA
    Troconis, D
    MoralesCanton, V
    OchoaContreras, D
    DalmaWeiszhausz, J
    JimenezSierra, JM
    PaczkaZapata, JA
    Martinez, JJ
    QuirozMercado, H
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 3156 - 3156
  • [47] Pneumatic Retinopexy for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis
    Fabian, Ido D.
    Kinori, Michael
    Efrati, Michal
    Alhalel, Amir
    Desatnik, Howard
    Hai, Orit Vidne
    Katz, Gabriel
    Platner, Eva
    Moisseiev, Joseph
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) : 166 - 171
  • [48] Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)
    Han, DP
    Mohsin, N
    Guse, CE
    Hartz, AJ
    Tarkanian, C
    Wolf, MD
    Sramek, SJ
    Mieler, WF
    Pulido, JS
    Connor, TB
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 2228 - 2228
  • [49] Retinal Displacement after Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment (ALIGN)
    FRANCISCONI, C. A. R. O. L. I. N. A. L. M.
    MARAFON, S. A. M. A. R. A. B.
    FIGUEIREDO, N. A. T. A. L. I. A. A.
    JUNCAL, V. E. R. E. N. A. R.
    SHAIKH, S. U. F. I. Y. A. N.
    BHAMBRA, N. I. S. H. A. A. N. T.
    KIM, D. A. V. I. D. T. T. A.
    BROSH, K. O. B. Y.
    QIAN, J. E. N. N. Y.
    CHAUDHARY, V. A. R. U. N.
    BERGER, A. L. A. N. R.
    GIAVEDONI, L. O. U. I. S. R.
    WONG, D. A. V. I. D. T.
    ALTOMARE, F. I. L. I. B. E. R. T. O.
    CHOW, D. A. V. I. D. R.
    DI SIMPLICIO, S. A. N. D. R. O.
    KADHIM, M. U. S. T. A. F. A. R.
    DEONARAIN, D. E. V. E. N.
    HILLIER, R. O. X. A. N. E. J.
    MUN, R. A. J. E. E. V. H., I
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 129 (04) : 458 - +
  • [50] RESCUE PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY IN PATIENTS WITH FAILED PRIMARY RETINAL DETACHMENT SURGERY
    Petrushkin, Harry J. D.
    Elgohary, Mostafa A.
    Sullivan, Paul M.
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2015, 35 (09): : 1851 - 1859