Heuristics as Decision-making Habits of Autonomous Sensorimotor Agents

被引:0
|
作者
Batta, Erasmo [1 ,2 ]
Stephens, Christopher [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Posgrad Ciencia & Ingn Computac, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Ciencias Complejidad, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ciencias Nucl, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
关键词
UNDERWEIGHT; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Human judgement is better described as a heuristic process rather than maximisation of a utility function. Heuristics are high cognitive processes of decision-making whose rapid and effortless implementation is useful to confront risk scenarios that compromise the viability of an individual. They can be defined in an enactive frame as self-sustained and self-generated habits of abductive behaviour selection in sensorimotor agents influenced by the individual history of sensorimotor contingencies and the environment. In this work, we analyse the emergence of patterns of behaviour and its necessary ecological conditions when performed decisions are related to energy intake and energy expenditure. Agent's sensors and intentions are coupled to a variation of the iterant deformable sensorimotor medium (IDSM) (Egbert and Barandiaran, 2014). This model explains transparently the generation of sensorimotor habits in simulated robots through the influence of registers of previously executed behaviours reinforced by repetition. We create a decision-making frame based on intentions as probabilities of specific actions which constitute the motor component of sensorimotor states on IDSM. In this model is seen that specific behaviour correlations with the lifespan of agents depend on the availability of energetic sources on the environment. Inheritance of the medium is introduced in agents with a small improvement on the lifespan of agents.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 78
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AUTONOMOUS DECISION-MAKING AND ITS RELATIONSHIPS WITH SATISFACTION AND REGRET WITH CAREER DECISION-MAKING
    Pilarik, Lubor
    Latalova, Veronika
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIA PRACE A ORGANIZACIE 2016, 2016, : 145 - 152
  • [22] Learning and Memory Processes in Autonomous Agents Using an Intelligent System of Decision-Making
    Kowalczuk, Zdzislaw
    Czubenko, Michal
    Jedruch, Wojciech
    [J]. ADVANCED AND INTELLIGENT COMPUTATIONS IN DIAGNOSIS AND CONTROL, 2016, 386 : 301 - 315
  • [23] Trust-Based Decision-Making System for Action Selection by Autonomous Agents
    Callebert, Lucile
    Lourdeaux, Domitile
    Barthes, Jean-Paul
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN (CSCWD), 2016, : 4 - 9
  • [24] Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles
    Schwarting, Wilko
    Alonso-Mora, Javier
    Rus, Daniela
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL, ROBOTICS, AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, VOL 1, 2018, 1 : 187 - 210
  • [25] Autonomous Decision-making for Satellites Surveillance
    Yu, Kuai
    Liu, Fengjing
    Liu, Yunhe
    Li, Guo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 31ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2019), 2019, : 2805 - 2810
  • [26] Autonomous Decision-Making While Drilling
    Cayeux, Eric
    Daireaux, Benoit
    Ambrus, Adrian
    Mihai, Rodica
    Carlsen, Liv
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [27] AUTONOMOUS DECISION-MAKING AND JAPANESE TRADITION
    HOSHINO, K
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 1995, 4 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [28] An Overview of Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicles
    Ghraizi, Dany
    Talj, Reine
    Francis, Clovis
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02):
  • [29] Decision-making in model construction: Unveiling habits
    Babel, Lucie
    Vinck, Dominique
    Karssenberg, Derek
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 120
  • [30] Formalizing heuristics in decision-making: a quantum probability perspective
    Pothos, Emmanuel M.
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2