The use of patient-reported outcome measures in primary care: applications, benefits and challenges

被引:9
|
作者
Brower, Krista [1 ]
Schmitt-Boshnick, Margo [2 ]
Haener, Michel [3 ]
Wilks, Shea [4 ]
Soprovich, Allison [5 ]
机构
[1] Edmonton Oliver Primary Care Network, 130,11910 111 Ave, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Red Deer Primary Care Network, 5120 47 St, Red Deer, AB, Canada
[3] Grande Prairie Primary Care Network, 104,11745 105 St, Grande Prairie, AB, Canada
[4] Palliser Primary Care Network, 104,140 Maple Ave SE, Medicine Hat, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Alberta PROMs & EQ5D Res & Support Unit APERSU, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Ctr Hlth Res Innovat, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
关键词
HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-021-00361-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
PROMs use in primary care has expanded from simply describing patient populations to contributing to decision-making, in response to the increasingly complex, ever-changing healthcare environment. In Alberta, primary care is organized into primary care networks (PCNs), where family physicians are grouped geographically and supported by allied health professionals. PCNs implement programs and services in response to local population health needs with frequent evaluation, often incorporating PROMs for this purpose. As PCN programs and services vary greatly across Alberta, so do their use of PROMs. An area of commonality is the use of the EQ-5D-5L instrument; 29 out of 41 PCNs are registered and licensed to use the instrument. It is often administrated by paper, pre- and post-program, and in combination with other specific measures, depending on the program or target population. Some PCNs share programming and therefore outcome measurement, but often the selection, implementation (including training and administration procedures) and evaluation/reporting of PROMs are unique to the PCN. As well, data analysis is largely dependent on the size and capacity of the PCN. Using PROMs for PCN program evaluation supports clinical understanding and complements clinical outcomes. PROMs describe the population attending a program, as well as provide an element of consistency when examining trends across multiple programs or timepoints. This contributes to inquiries and decisions around program development, components, administrative features, resource allocation and delivery. Challenges of PROMs use in primary care include the absence of cohesive data capture technology. This limits data capabilities and presents difficulties with data fidelity, storage, export, and analysis. Additionally, this real-world application lacks a control arm and presents methodological challenges for comparative research purposes. Furthermore, capturing long term patient outcomes poses administrative challenges of multiple follow ups. More research is required into best reporting mechanisms to ensure the data is used to its full potential. To overcome these challenges, leadership and clinician engagement are key. As well, determining consistent PCN PROM reporting requirements will ensure data are comparable across PCNs and contribute to provincial level evaluations, further supporting the movement towards overall health system quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The employment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to communicate the likely benefits of surgery
    Briffa, Norman
    PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2018, 9 : 263 - 266
  • [22] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Pablo F. Recinos
    Cheryl J. Dunphy
    Nicolas Thompson
    Jesse Schuschu
    John L. Urchek
    Irene L. Katzan
    Advances in Therapy, 2017, 34 : 452 - 465
  • [23] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Recinos, Pablo F.
    Dunphy, Cheryl J.
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Schuschu, Jesse
    Urchek, John L., III
    Katzan, Irene L.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2017, 34 (02) : 452 - 465
  • [24] A patient-centred approach to measuring quality in kidney care: patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan L.
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Anderson, Nicola
    Calvert, Melanie
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2017, 26 (06): : 442 - 449
  • [25] Commentary on "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology"
    Patel, Heli
    Feldman, Steven R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 24 (04) : 497 - 498
  • [26] Commentary on “Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology”
    Heli Patel
    Steven R. Feldman
    American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2023, 24 : 497 - 498
  • [27] Meaningful Clinical Applications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics
    Makhni, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (01): : 84 - 91
  • [28] Endocrinologists' use of patient-reported outcome measures in the care of people with diabetes: A qualitative study
    Nielsen, B. K.
    Terkildsen, M. D.
    Jensen, A. L.
    Pedersen, M. Z.
    Hollesen, M. R.
    Lomborg, K.
    DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 12
  • [29] Intelligent Palliative Care Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Sandham, Margaret H.
    Hedgecock, Emma A.
    Siegert, Richard J.
    Narayanan, Ajit
    Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 747 - 757
  • [30] Current Status of Worldwide Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Spine Care
    Falavigna, Asdrubal
    Dozza, Diego Cassol
    Teles, Alisson R.
    Wong, Chung Chek
    Barbagallo, Giuseppe
    Brodke, Darrel
    Al-Mutair, Abdulaziz
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Riew, K. Daniel
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 108 : 328 - 335