Indicators for local health plan monitoring and evaluation: A modified Delphi consensus

被引:1
|
作者
Santos, Joao Vasco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martins, Filipa Santos [4 ]
Vidal-Castro, Joana [1 ]
Silva-Rocha, Sofia [5 ]
Areias, Rita [6 ]
Oliveira, Antonio [1 ]
Santos, Sandra [1 ]
Lamelas, Cristina [1 ]
Amorim, Helena [7 ]
Martins, Alexandra [8 ]
Vieira, Mariana [8 ]
Ramos, Joao Pedro [9 ]
Pinto, Marta [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] ARS Norte, Publ Hlth Unit, ACES Grande Porto Espinho Gaia 8, Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med, MEDCIDS Dept Community Med Informat & Hlth Decis, Porto, Portugal
[3] CINTESIS Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Porto, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
[5] ARS Norte, Publ Hlth Unit, ACES Entre Douro & Vouga Aveiro Norte 2, Porto, Portugal
[6] ARS Norte, Publ Hlth Unit, ACES Alto Ave Guimaraes Vizela & Terras Basto, Porto, Portugal
[7] ARS Norte, Publ Hlth Unit, ACES Entre Douro & Vouga Feira Arouca 1, Porto, Portugal
[8] Univ Porto, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Porto, Portugal
[9] Crime & Justice Grp Campbell Collaborat, Subgrp Terrorism & Secur, Porto, Portugal
关键词
consensus; Delphi technique; health planning; public health; qualitative research; CLINICAL INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/phn.13036
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective There is still a lack of health indicators for monitoring and evaluating health planning at the local level. In Portugal, local health plans (LHP) include a prioritized set of health priorities, which should be monitored and evaluated. This study is an example of a low-resource method to identify and reuse indicators for LHP monitoring and evaluation already collected for other purposes. Design and sample A modified Delphi consensus method was applied, with three rounds of email rating questionnaires and a final meeting, between January 2018 and January 2019. The Delphi panel consisted of eight members from the Planning and Administration Group of the Espinho/Gaia Local Public Health Unit. Measurements Panelists were asked to assess the indicators' validity for monitoring diseases/determinants from a pre-selected list of potential binomials between 140 PHC indicators and 15 diseases/determinants. Results After four rounds, there was consensus in considering 141 binomials (34.0%) as appropriate, diabetes mellitus being the disease with more appropriate indicators. Conclusion This study portrays the applicability of a commonly used, easy and low-resource method in a Portuguese Local Public Health Unit to select and reuse primary health care indicators for LHP monitoring and evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 759
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study
    Sato, Noriko
    Fujita, Kenji
    Kushida, Kazuki
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (02) : 517 - 538
  • [22] Presentation of the consensus indicators for public health monitoring for older people in Germany
    Fuchs, J.
    Gaertner, B.
    Scheidt-Nave, C.
    Grube, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 377 - 377
  • [23] Implementing and monitoring the right to health in breast cancer: selection of indicators using a Delphi process
    Lisa Montel
    Michel P. Coleman
    Therese Murphy
    Dina Balabanova
    Raffaele Ciula
    Dabney P. Evans
    Claire Lougarre
    Didier Verhoeven
    Claudia Allemani
    [J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22
  • [24] Implementing and monitoring the right to health in breast cancer: selection of indicators using a Delphi process
    Montel, Lisa
    Coleman, Michel P.
    Murphy, Therese
    Balabanova, Dina
    Ciula, Raffaele
    Evans, Dabney P.
    Lougarre, Claire
    Verhoeven, Didier
    Allemani, Claudia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [25] Prioritisation of quality indicators for elective perioperative care: a Delphi consensus
    Gilhooly, D.
    Chazapis, M.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    [J]. PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [26] Prioritisation of quality indicators for elective perioperative care: a Delphi consensus
    D. Gilhooly
    M. Chazapis
    S. R. Moonesinghe
    [J]. Perioperative Medicine, 9
  • [27] Cultural Adaptation of the Actionable Health App Evaluation in Japan: Protocol for a Web-Based Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study
    Yokomitsu, Kengo
    Takashina, Hikari N.
    Takebayashi, Yoshitake
    Muranaka, Seiji
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [28] Establishing an Expert Consensus on Key Indicators of the Quality of Life among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Modified Delphi Study
    Mlakar, Izidor
    Lin, Simon
    Nateqi, Jama
    Gruarin, Stefanie
    Dieguez, Lorena
    Piairo, Paulina
    Pires, Liliana R.
    Tement, Sara
    Aleksandravica, Ilona
    Leja, Marcis
    Arcimovica, Krista
    Bleret, Valerie
    Kaux, Jean-Francois
    Kolh, Philippe
    Maquet, Didier
    Garcia Gomez, Jesus
    Garcia Mata, Jesus
    Salgado, Mercedes
    Horvat, Matej
    Ravnik, Maja
    Flis, Vojko
    Smrke, Urska
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [29] Collaborative identification and prioritisation of mental health nursing care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi consensus study
    Hunter, Andrew
    Barrett, Nora
    Gallen, Anne
    Conway, Gillian
    Brennan, Anne
    Giltenane, Martina
    Murphy, Louise
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Development of key performance indicators for emergency departments in Ireland using an electronic modified-Delphi consensus approach
    Wakai, Abel
    O'Sullivan, Ronan
    Staunton, Paul
    Walsh, Cathal
    Hickey, Fergal
    Plunkett, Patrick K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (02) : 109 - 114