Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies

被引:1
|
作者
Meckling, Jonas [1 ]
Galeazzi, Clara [2 ,3 ]
Shears, Esther [4 ,5 ]
Xu, Tong [3 ,6 ]
Anadon, Laura Diaz [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Belfer Ctr Sci & Int Affairs, Harvard Kennedy Sch, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Governance, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Energy & Resources Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Bologna, Dept Econ, Bologna, Italy
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Urban Environm, Xiamen, Peoples R China
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
TECHNOLOGY; POLICY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1038/s41560-022-01117-3
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accelerating energy innovation for decarbonization hinges on public investment in research, development and demonstration (RD&D). Here we examine the evolution and variation of public energy RD&D funding and institutions and associated drivers across eight major economies, including China and India (2000-2018). The share of new clean energy grew at the expense of nuclear, while the fossil fuel RD&D share remained stable. Governments created new institutions but experimented only marginally with novel designs that bridge lab to market to accelerate commercialization. In theory, crisis, cooperation and competition can be drivers of change. We find that cooperation in Mission Innovation is associated with punctuated change in clean-energy RD&D growth, and clean tech competition with China is associated with gradual change. Stimulus spending after the financial crisis, instead, boosted fossil and nuclear only. Looking ahead, global coopetition-the interplay of RD&D cooperation and clean tech competition-offers opportunities for accelerating energy innovation to meet climate goals. Public funding and institutions for energy innovation are critical to achieving climate goals, but our understanding of their evolution, variation and drivers is limited. Meckling et al. compile funding and institutional data across major economies and examine how they changed after the financial crisis, Mission Innovation and expanded competition with China.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 885
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Innovation in Contemporary Economies
    Pohulak-Zoledowska, Elzbieta
    [J]. OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2016, 7 (03) : 451 - 466
  • [32] Innovation Policy Reforms, Emerging Role Models and Bridge Institutions: Evidence from North African Economies
    Djeflat, Abdelkader
    Kuznetsov, Yevgeny
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 6 (05): : 467 - 479
  • [33] Major funding effort
    不详
    [J]. GAS ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 1996, 36 (06): : 29 - 29
  • [34] Major NIH funding
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1996, 57 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [35] Win funding for research and innovation
    不详
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2008, 204 (09) : 484 - 484
  • [36] Funding innovation in neglected diseases
    Yamey, Gavin
    Batson, Amie
    Kilmarx, Peter H.
    Yotebieng, Marcel
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 360
  • [37] Finance, institutions and growth in emerging economies
    Artus, Patrick
    Cartapanis, Andre
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2008, 59 (06): : 1053 - 1057
  • [38] The Next Evolution in Funding Innovation
    Dusil, Gabriel
    Cerny, Dalibor
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2018,
  • [39] ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - REPLY
    CAMERON, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1977, 3 (01) : 123 - 125
  • [40] Transitional economies - Banking, finance, institutions
    Girardone, C
    [J]. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2003, 23 (03): : 182 - 184