Molecular correlates with MGMT promoter methylation and silencing support CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer

被引:81
|
作者
Ogino, Shuji
Kawasaki, Takako
Kirkner, Gregory J.
Suemoto, Yuko
Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.
Fuchs, Charles S.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Sch Med,BWH Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.2007.119750
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP or CIMP-high) with widespread promoter methylation is a distinct epigenetic phenotype in colorectal cancer. In contrast, a phenotype with less widespread promoter methylation (CIMP-low) has not been well characterised. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and silencing have been associated with G. A mutations and microsatellite instability-low (MSI-low). Aim: To examine molecular correlates with MGMT methylation/silencing in colorectal cancer. Methods: Utilising MethyLight technology, we quantified DNA methylation in MGMT and eight other markers (a CIMP-diagnostic panel; CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, IGF2, MLH1, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1) in 920 population-based colorectal cancers. Results: Tumours with both MGMT methylation and loss were correlated positively with MSI-low (p = 0.02), CIMP-high (>= 6/8 methylated CIMP markers, p = 0.005), CIMP-low (1/8-5/8 methylated CIMP markers, p = 0.002, compared to CIMP-0 with 0/8 methylated markers), KRAS G. A mutation (p = 0.02), and inversely with 18q loss of heterozygosity (p = 0.0002). Tumours were classified into nine MSI/CIMP subtypes. Among the CIMP-low group, tumours with both MGMT methylation and loss were far more frequent in MSI-low tumours (67%, 12/18) than MSI-high tumours (5.6%, 1/18; p = 0.0003) and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours (33%, 52/160; p = 0.008). However, no such relationship was observed among the CIMP-high or CIMP-0 groups. Conclusion: The relationship between MGMT methylation/silencing and MSI-low is limited to only CIMP-low tumours, supporting the suggestion that CIMP-low in colorectal cancer may be a different molecular phenotype from CIMP-high and CIMP-0. Our data support a molecular difference between MSI-low and MSS in colorectal cancer, and a possible link between CIMP-low, MSI-low, MGMT methylation/loss and KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1571
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aberrant TET1 methylation closely associated with CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer
    Ichimura, Norihisa
    Shinjo, Keiko
    Ohka, Fumiharu
    Katsushima, Keisuke
    Hatanaka, Akira
    Tojo, Masayuki
    Shimizu, Yasuhiro
    Yamamoto, Eiichiro
    Suzuki, Hiromu
    Kondo, Yutaka
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [42] IGFBP3 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer:: Relationship with microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and p53
    Kawasaki, Takako
    Nosho, Katsuhiko
    Ohnishi, Mutsuko
    Suemoto, Yuko
    Kirknery, Gregory J.
    Fuchs, Charles S.
    Ogino, Shuji
    NEOPLASIA, 2007, 9 (12): : 1091 - 1098
  • [43] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CPG ISLAND METHYLATOR PHENOTYPE (CIMP) AND TREATMENT RESPONSE OF FOLFIRI WITH CETUXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER (MCRC)
    Kim, S. H.
    Park, K. H.
    Shin, S. J.
    Lee, K. Y.
    Kim, T. I.
    Kim, N. K.
    Rha, S. Y.
    Roh, J. K.
    Ahn, J. B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 41 - 42
  • [44] Preference of aberrant methylation of promoter region in multiple genes indicates presence of Cpg island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancers
    Hokazono, Koji
    Ueki, Takashi
    Konomi, Hiroyuki
    Mibu, Ryuichi
    Tanaka, Masao
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A320 - A321
  • [45] CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Methylation of Wnt Pathway Genes Together Predict Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Kim, Se Hyun
    Park, Kyu Hyun
    Shin, Sang Joon
    Lee, Kang Young
    Kim, Tae Il
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Rha, Sun Young
    Ahn, Joong Bae
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 59 (05) : 588 - 594
  • [46] Phase II study of nab-paclitaxel in refractory small bowel adenocarcinoma and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high colorectal cancer
    Overman, M. J.
    Adam, L.
    Raghav, K.
    Wang, J.
    Kee, B.
    Fogelman, D.
    Eng, C.
    Vilar, E.
    Shroff, R.
    Dasari, A.
    Wolff, R.
    Morris, J.
    Karunasena, E.
    Pisanic, R., II
    Azad, N.
    Kopetz, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (01) : 139 - 144
  • [47] Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Advani, Shailesh M.
    Advani, Pragati
    DeSantis, Stacia M.
    Brown, Derek
    VonVille, Helena M.
    Lam, Michael
    Loree, Jonathan M.
    Sarshekeh, Amir Mehrvarz
    Bressler, Jan
    Lopez, David S.
    Daniel, Carrie R.
    Swartz, Michael D.
    Kopetz, Scott
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 11 (05): : 1188 - 1201
  • [48] SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF MGMT METHYLATION AND DETERMINATION OF IDH1 R132H AND CpG ISLAND METHYLATOR PHENOTYPE (CIMP) IN GLIOMAS USING COUPLED ABSCRIPTION PCR SIGNALING (CAPS)
    McCarthy, David
    Diago, Oscar
    Hogan, Daniel
    Ostertag, Derek
    Hanna, Michelle
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 83 - 83
  • [49] Higher Prevalence of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype-Positive (CIMP plus ) Status in Advanced Adenomas Detected Using Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
    Khalid-de Bakker, Carolina
    Jonkers, Daisy
    Smits, Kim M.
    Hameeteman, Wim
    de Bruine, Adriaan P.
    Stockbruegger, Reinhold
    van Engeland, Manon
    Masclee, Ad
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A302 - A302
  • [50] Methylation of the 3p22 region encompassing MLH1 is representative of the CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer
    Wong, Justin J-L
    Hawkins, Nicholas J.
    Ward, Robyn L.
    Hitchins, Megan P.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 (03) : 396 - 411