Influence of Baseline Positron Emission Tomography in Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer on Survival and Response to Therapy

被引:2
|
作者
Abdelhakeem, Ahmed [1 ]
Patnana, Madhavi [2 ]
Wang, Xuemei [3 ]
Rogers, Jane E. [4 ]
Murphy, Mariela Blum [1 ]
Sagebiel, Tara [2 ]
Ikoma, Naruhiko [5 ]
Badgwell, Brian D. [5 ]
Trail, Allison [1 ]
Estrella, Jeannelyn S. [6 ]
Lu, Yang [7 ]
Devine, Catherine [2 ]
Ajani, Jaffer A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Abdominal Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Pharmacy Clin Programs, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Anat Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Fluorodeoxyglucose; Positron emission tomography; Prognosis; Gastroesophageal cancer; GASTRIC-CANCER; PET; ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGEAL; JUNCTION;
D O I
10.1159/000517842
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) remains uncertain once gastroesophageal cancer is metastatic. We hypothesized that assessment of detailed PET-CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and/or total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), and the extent of metastatic burden could aid prediction of probability of response or prognosticate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed treatment-naive patients with stage 4 gastroesophageal cancer (December 2002-August 2017) who had initial PET-CT for cancer staging at MD Anderson Cancer Center. SUVmax and TLG were compared with treatment outcomes for the full cohort and subgroups based on metastatic burden (<= 2 or >2 metastatic sites). Results: We identified 129 patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent PET-CT before first-line therapy. The median follow-up time was 61 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months; the first progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months. SUVmax or TLG of the primary tumor or of all metastases combined had no influence on OS or PFS, whether the number of metastases was <= 2 or >2. Overall response rates (ORRs) to first-line therapy were 48% and 45% for patients with <= 2 and >2 metastases, respectively (nonsignificant). ORR did not differ based on low or high values of SUVmax or TLG. Conclusions: This is the first assessment of a unique set of PET-CT data and its association with outcomes in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. In our large cohort of patients, detailed analyses of PET-CT (by SUVmax and/or TLG) did not discriminate any parameters examined. Thus, baseline PET-CT in untreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients has limited or no utility.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 664
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Value of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluating Metastatic Disease in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
    Kim, Mi-Jin
    Lee, Kwang Hyuck
    Lee, Kyu Taek
    Lee, Jong Kyun
    Ku, Bon-Ho
    Oh, Cho-Rong
    Heo, Jin Seok
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Choi, Dong Wook
    PANCREAS, 2012, 41 (06) : 897 - 903
  • [42] Correlating computed tomography and positron emission tomography scan with operative findings in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Johnson, K
    Bakhsh, A
    Young, D
    Martin, E
    Arnold, M
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (03) : 354 - 357
  • [43] The influence of positron emission tomography (PET) in changing treatment options in locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).
    Thomas, C
    Kassam, Z
    Wong, W
    Harrison, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 : S44 - S44
  • [44] [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography: Computed tomography in recurrent and metastatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Jadvar, Hossein
    Henderson, Robert W.
    Conti, Peter S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [45] Positron emission tomography imaging of tumor response after photodynamic therapy
    Bérard, V
    Lecomte, R
    van Lier, JE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PATHOLOGY TOXICOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 25 (1-2) : 239 - 249
  • [46] The role of positron emission tomography in selecting patients with metastatic cancer for adrenalectomy - Discussion
    McHenry, C
    Debord, J
    DeJong, SA
    Harrison, J
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2000, 66 (05) : 436 - 437
  • [47] Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer
    Morris, MJ
    Akhurst, T
    Osman, I
    Nunez, R
    Macapinlac, H
    Siedlecki, K
    Verbel, D
    Schwartz, L
    Larson, SM
    Scher, HI
    UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (06) : 913 - 918
  • [48] Functional positron emission tomography - Response
    Reutens, DC
    Bittar, RG
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 91 (01) : 167 - 167
  • [49] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer
    Baysal, Hakan
    Serdaroglu, Ahmet Yusuf
    Ozemir, Ibrahim Ali
    Baysal, Begumhan
    Gungor, Serkan
    Erol, Cem Ilgin
    Ozsoy, Mehmet Sait
    Ekinci, Ozgur
    Alimoglu, Orhan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 278 : 223 - 232
  • [50] Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Protocols for Radiation Therapy Planning and Therapy Response Assessment
    Shreve, Paul
    Swanston, Nancy M.
    Faasse, Todd
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2010, 31 (06) : 468 - 479