Primal-Dual Active-Set Methods for Large-Scale Optimization

被引:1
|
作者
Robinson, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Math & Stat, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Constrained optimization; Primal-dual; Augmented Lagrangian; Large scale; 2ND-DERIVATIVE SQP METHOD; QUADRATIC-PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; INVERSE PROBLEM; CONVERGENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10957-015-0708-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce two primal-dual active-set methods for solving large-scale constrained optimization problems. The first method minimizes a sequence of primal-dual augmented Lagrangian functions subject to bounds on the primal variables and artificial bounds on the dual variables. The basic structure is similar to the well-known optimization package Lancelot (Conn, et al. in SIAM J Numer Anal 28:545-572, 1991), which uses the traditional primal augmented Lagrangian function. Like Lancelot, our algorithm may use gradient projection-based methods enhanced by subspace acceleration techniques to solve each subproblem and therefore may be implemented matrix-free. The artificial bounds on the dual variables are a unique feature of our method and serve as a form of dual regularization. Our second algorithm is a two-phase method. The first phase computes iterates using our primal-dual augmented Lagrangian algorithm, which benefits from using cheap gradient projections and matrix-free linear CG calculations. The final iterate produced during this phase is then used as input for phase two, which is a stabilized sequential quadratic programming method (Gill and Robinson in SIAM J Opt 1-45, 2013). Obtaining superlinear local convergence under weak assumptions is an important benefit of the transition to a stabilized sequential quadratic programming algorithm. Interestingly, the bound-constrained subproblem used in phase one is equivalent to the stabilized subproblem used in phase two under certain assumptions. This fact makes our choice of algorithms a natural one.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 171
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ON REGULARIZATION AND ACTIVE-SET METHODS WITH COMPLEXITY FOR CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION
    Birgin, E. G.
    Martinez, J. M.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 28 (02) : 1367 - 1395
  • [42] Primal, dual and primal-dual partitions in continuous linear optimization
    Goberna, M. A.
    Todorov, M. I.
    OPTIMIZATION, 2007, 56 (5-6) : 617 - 628
  • [43] A primal-dual active-set algorithm for bilaterally constrained total variation deblurring and piecewise constant Mumford-Shah segmentation problems
    Krishnan, D.
    Pham, Quang Vinh
    Yip, Andy M.
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 2009, 31 (1-3) : 237 - 266
  • [44] Block-wise primal-dual algorithms for large-scale doubly penalized ANOVA modeling
    Fu, Penghui
    Tan, Zhiqiang
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2024, 194
  • [45] A primal-dual active-set algorithm for bilaterally constrained total variation deblurring and piecewise constant Mumford-Shah segmentation problems
    D. Krishnan
    Quang Vinh Pham
    Andy M. Yip
    Advances in Computational Mathematics, 2009, 31 : 237 - 266
  • [46] Primal-dual methods for linear programming
    Univ. Californa San Diego, dep. mathematics, La Jolla CA 92093, United States
    Mathematical Programming, Series B, 1995, 70 (03): : 251 - 277
  • [47] Primal-dual damping algorithms for optimization
    Zuo, Xinzhe
    Osher, Stanley
    Li, Wuchen
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 9 (02) : 467 - 504
  • [48] Asynchronous Multiagent Primal-Dual Optimization
    Hale, Matthew T.
    Nedic, Angelia
    Egerstedt, Magnus
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2017, 62 (09) : 4421 - 4435
  • [49] Mesh independence and fast local convergence of a primal-dual active-set method for mixed control-state constrained elliptic control problems
    Hintermueller, M.
    ANZIAM JOURNAL, 2007, 49 : 1 - 38
  • [50] A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Distributed Optimization
    Bianchi, P.
    Hachem, W.
    2014 IEEE 53RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2014, : 4240 - 4245