Effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported crowns

被引:1
|
作者
Fardin, Vinicius P. [1 ]
Bergamo, Edmara T. P. [1 ]
Bordin, Dimorvan [2 ]
Hirata, Ronaldo [3 ]
Bonfante, Estevam A. [1 ]
Bonfante, Gerson [1 ]
Coelho, Paulo G. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Universus Veritas UNG, Dept Restorat Dent, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
[3] NYU, Dept Biomat & Biomimet, Coll Dent, New York, NY 10003 USA
[4] NYU, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Mech & Aerosp Engn, New York, NY USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Dental implants; Biomechanics; Fatigue; Weibull analysis; TORQUE-LIMITING DEVICES; CONSENSUS STATEMENTS; SINGLE CROWNS; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; ZIRCONIA; PRELOAD; COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105019
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported anterior crowns. Materials and methods: Seventy-two implants with internal conical connections (4.0 x 10mm, Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils) were divided into four groups (n = 18 each): 1) Manufacturer's recommendations torque (25 N. cm for abutment's screw and 30 N.cm for crown's screw) (MaT); 2) Retightening after 10 min (ReT); 3) Torque 16% below recommended to simulate an uncalibrated wrench (AgT), and; 4) Temporary crown simulation (TeT), where crowns were torqued to 13 N.cm to simulate manual tightening, subjected to 11,200 cycles to simulate temporary crown treatment time (190 N), and then retightened to manufacturer torque (TeT). All specimens were subjected to cyclic fatigue in distilled water with a load of 190 N until 250,000 cycles or failure. The probability of survival (reliability) to complete a mission of 50,000 cycles was calculated and plotted using the Weibull 2-Parameter analysis. Weibull modulus and number of cycles at which 62.3% of the specimens would fail were also calculated and plotted. The failure mode was characterized in stereo and scanning electron microscopes (SEM). Results: The probability of survival was 69.3% for MaT, 70% for ReT, 54.8% for AgT, and 40.3% for TeT, all with no statistically significant difference. Weibull modulus was approximately 1.0 for all groups. The characteristic number of cycles for failure was 105,000 cycles for MaT, 123,000 for ReT, 82,000 cycles for AgT, and 54,900 cycles for TeT, with no significant difference between groups. The chief failure mode for MaT, ReT, AgT groups was crown screw fracture, whereas abutment screw fracture was the chief failure mode for the TeT group. Conclusion: Tightening protocol did not influence the probability of survival of the screw-retained anterior crowns supported by internal conical implants (Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 10-year randomised controlled trial
    Vigolo, Paolo
    Mutinelli, Sabrina
    Givani, Andrea
    Stellini, Edoardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 (04) : 355 - 364
  • [22] Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Rittich, Anne
    Gross, Karin
    Hartkamp, Oliver
    von der Stueck, Annabelle
    Raith, Stefan
    Reich, Sven
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (12) : 1484 - 1495
  • [23] Straightforward tip for identifying the type of screwdriver needed for screw-retained implant-supported prostheses
    Real-Voltas, Francisco
    Figueras-Alvarez, Oscar
    Barrocal-Rodriguez, Susana
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (03): : 539 - 540
  • [24] AN ALTERNATIVE DIRECT TECHNIQUE FOR THE FABRICATION OF AN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED, SCREW-RETAINED FIXED INTERIM RESTORATION
    Yilmaz, Burak
    McGlumphy, Edwin
    Purcell, Bradley
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 107 (02): : 137 - 139
  • [25] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study
    Vigolo, P
    Givani, A
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (02) : 260 - 265
  • [26] Retrospective analysis of loosening of cement-retained vs screw-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions
    Korsch, Michael
    Walther, Winfried
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (07): : 583 - 589
  • [27] Prevention of bacterial leakage into screw-retained implant crowns in vitro
    Guindy, JS
    Besimo, CE
    Besimo, R
    Lewetag, D
    Meyer, J
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 122 - 122
  • [28] Trueness and adaptation of screw-retained implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using 3-dimensional gel deposition
    Sun, Zhe
    Li, Yuan
    Zhao, Jing
    Zheng, Yuanna
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (01): : 229e1 - 229e7
  • [29] Effect of Abutment Screw Design and Crown/Implant Ratio on Preload Maintenance of Single-Crown Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses
    Rodrigues, Isabela
    Zanardi, Piero
    Sesma, Newton
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (06) : 1397 - 1403
  • [30] Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Bonded to Gold Cylinders
    Karl, Matthias
    Graef, Friedrich
    Taylor, Thomas D.
    Heckmann, Siegfried M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2009, 22 (06) : 604 - 606