Effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported crowns

被引:1
|
作者
Fardin, Vinicius P. [1 ]
Bergamo, Edmara T. P. [1 ]
Bordin, Dimorvan [2 ]
Hirata, Ronaldo [3 ]
Bonfante, Estevam A. [1 ]
Bonfante, Gerson [1 ]
Coelho, Paulo G. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Universus Veritas UNG, Dept Restorat Dent, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
[3] NYU, Dept Biomat & Biomimet, Coll Dent, New York, NY 10003 USA
[4] NYU, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Mech & Aerosp Engn, New York, NY USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Dental implants; Biomechanics; Fatigue; Weibull analysis; TORQUE-LIMITING DEVICES; CONSENSUS STATEMENTS; SINGLE CROWNS; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; ZIRCONIA; PRELOAD; COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105019
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported anterior crowns. Materials and methods: Seventy-two implants with internal conical connections (4.0 x 10mm, Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils) were divided into four groups (n = 18 each): 1) Manufacturer's recommendations torque (25 N. cm for abutment's screw and 30 N.cm for crown's screw) (MaT); 2) Retightening after 10 min (ReT); 3) Torque 16% below recommended to simulate an uncalibrated wrench (AgT), and; 4) Temporary crown simulation (TeT), where crowns were torqued to 13 N.cm to simulate manual tightening, subjected to 11,200 cycles to simulate temporary crown treatment time (190 N), and then retightened to manufacturer torque (TeT). All specimens were subjected to cyclic fatigue in distilled water with a load of 190 N until 250,000 cycles or failure. The probability of survival (reliability) to complete a mission of 50,000 cycles was calculated and plotted using the Weibull 2-Parameter analysis. Weibull modulus and number of cycles at which 62.3% of the specimens would fail were also calculated and plotted. The failure mode was characterized in stereo and scanning electron microscopes (SEM). Results: The probability of survival was 69.3% for MaT, 70% for ReT, 54.8% for AgT, and 40.3% for TeT, all with no statistically significant difference. Weibull modulus was approximately 1.0 for all groups. The characteristic number of cycles for failure was 105,000 cycles for MaT, 123,000 for ReT, 82,000 cycles for AgT, and 54,900 cycles for TeT, with no significant difference between groups. The chief failure mode for MaT, ReT, AgT groups was crown screw fracture, whereas abutment screw fracture was the chief failure mode for the TeT group. Conclusion: Tightening protocol did not influence the probability of survival of the screw-retained anterior crowns supported by internal conical implants (Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effect of Two Different Immediate Loading Protocols in Implant-Supported Screw-Retained Prostheses
    Khorshid, Heba E.
    Hamed, Hamdy Aboul Fotouh
    Aziz, Essam A.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [2] A TECHNIQUE FOR FABRICATING SINGLE SCREW-RETAINED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED INTERIM CROWNS IN CONJUNCTION WITH IMPLANT SURGERY
    McRory, M. Eric
    Cagna, David R.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (06): : 455 - 459
  • [3] New abutment for a screw-retained, implant-supported crown
    Prisco, R
    Morgano, SM
    D'Amato, S
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (01): : 30 - 33
  • [4] Comparison of wear and fracture resistance of additively and subtractively manufactured screw-retained, implant-supported crowns
    Turksayar, Almira Ada Diken
    Demirel, Munir
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Olcay, Emin Orkun
    Eyuboglu, Tan Firat
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01): : 154 - 164
  • [5] Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Loads of Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Crowns
    Camatta, Hercules Pessin
    Ferreira, Rodrigo Melim
    Ferrairo, Brunna Mota
    Strelhow, Samira Sandy
    Rubo, Jose Henrique
    Mori, Aline Akemi
    Ferruzzi, Fernanda
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (08): : 690 - 697
  • [6] A maxillary screw-retained, implant-supported diagnostic wax pattern
    Proussaefs, P
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (04): : 403 - 406
  • [7] Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained, Cement-Retained, and Screw-Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Metal Ceramic Posterior Crowns
    Al-Omari, Wael M.
    Shadid, Rola
    Abu-Naba'a, Layla
    El Masoud, Bilal
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (04): : 263 - 273
  • [8] The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis
    Brosky, AE
    Korioth, TWP
    Hodges, J
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (03): : 244 - 249
  • [9] A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns
    Torrado, E
    Ercoli, C
    Al Mardini, M
    Graser, GN
    Tallents, RH
    Cordaro, L
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 91 (06): : 532 - 537
  • [10] Evaluation of debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to abutments of different designs and surface treatments
    Khalifa, Ahmed Abdel Latif
    Metwally, Nayrouz Adel
    Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (01): : 215 - 220