In vivo performance of genetically encoded indicators of neural activity in flies

被引:148
|
作者
Reiff, DF [1 ]
Ihring, A
Guerrero, G
Isacoff, EY
Joesch, M
Nakai, J
Borst, A
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Neurobiol, Dept Syst & Computat Neurosci, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] RIKEN Brain Sci Inst, Lab Memory & Learning, Saitama 351198, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2005年 / 25卷 / 19期
关键词
genetic indicators; GFP; neural activity; transgenic animals; optical imaging; calcium;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4900-04.2005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Genetically encoded fluorescent probes of neural activity represent new promising tools for systems neuroscience. Here, we present a comparative in vivo analysis of 10 different genetically encoded calcium indicators, as well as the pH- sensitive synapto- pHluorin. We analyzed their fluorescence changes in presynaptic boutons of the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction. Robust neural activity did not result in any or noteworthy fluorescence changes when Flash- Pericam, Camgaroo- 1, and Camgaroo- 2 were expressed. However, calculated on the raw data, fractional fluorescence changes up to 18% were reported by synapto- pHluorin, Yellow Cameleon 2.0, 2.3, and 3.3, Inverse- Pericam, GCaMP1.3, GCaMP1.6, and the troponin C- based calcium sensor TN- L15. The response characteristics of all of these indicators differed considerably from each other, with GCaMP1.6 reporting high rates of neural activity with the largest and fastest fluorescence changes. However, GCaMP1.6 suffered from photobleaching, whereas the fluorescence signals of the double- chromophore indicators were in general smaller but more photostable and reproducible, with TN- L15 showing the fastest rise of the signals at lower activity rates. We show for GCaMP1.3 and YC3.3 that an expanded range of neural activity evoked fairly linear fluorescence changes and a corresponding linear increase in the signal- to- noise ratio ( SNR). The expression level of the indicator biased the signal kinetics and SNR, whereas the signal amplitude was independent. The presented data will be useful for in vivo experiments with respect to the selection of an appropriate indicator, as well as for the correct interpretation of the optical signals.
引用
收藏
页码:4766 / 4778
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetically encoded neural activity indicators
    Looger, Loren L.
    Griesbeck, Oliver
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [2] Genetically encoded neural activity indicators
    Fang Luo
    Yin Wei
    Ziyue Wang
    Minmin Luo
    Ji Hu
    BrainScienceAdvances, 2018, 4 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [3] Synthetic and genetically encoded fluorescent neural activity indicators
    Deo, Claire
    Lavis, Luke D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2018, 50 : 101 - 108
  • [4] Neural activity imaging with genetically encoded calcium indicators
    Tian, Lin
    Akerboom, Jasper
    Schreiter, Eric R.
    Looger, Loren L.
    OPTOGENETICS: TOOLS FOR CONTROLLING AND MONITORING NEURONAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 196 : 79 - 94
  • [5] Monitoring activity in neural circuits with genetically encoded indicators
    Broussard, Gerard J.
    Liang, Ruqiang
    Tian, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 7
  • [6] Reporting neural activity with genetically encoded calcium indicators
    Hires, S. Andrew
    Tian, Lin
    Looger, Loren L.
    BRAIN CELL BIOLOGY, 2008, 36 (1-4) : 69 - 86
  • [7] Current progress in genetically encoded voltage indicators for neural activity recording
    Inagaki, Shigenori
    Nagai, Takeharu
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 33 : 95 - 100
  • [8] Genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity
    Lin, Michael Z.
    Schnitzer, Mark J.
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 19 (09) : 1142 - 1153
  • [9] Genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity
    Michael Z Lin
    Mark J Schnitzer
    Nature Neuroscience, 2016, 19 : 1142 - 1153
  • [10] Imaging Neurotransmitter and Neuromodulator Dynamics In Vivo with Genetically Encoded Indicators
    Sabatini, Bernardo L.
    Tian, Lin
    NEURON, 2020, 108 (01) : 17 - 32