Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode

被引:82
|
作者
Aschendorff, Antje [1 ]
Briggs, Robert [6 ]
Brademann, Goetz [2 ]
Helbig, Silke [3 ]
Hornung, Joachim [4 ]
Lenarz, Thomas [5 ]
Marx, Mathieu [7 ]
Ramos, Angel [10 ]
Stoever, Timo [3 ]
Escude, Bernard [8 ]
James, Chris J. [7 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
[3] Klinikum JW Goethe Univ, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover, Germany
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
[8] Clin Pasteur Toulouse, Toulouse, France
[9] Cochlear France SAS, 135 Route St Simon, FR-31100 Toulouse, France
[10] Complejo Hosp Univ Insular Materno Infantil, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
关键词
Cochlear implant; Electrode array; Computed tomography; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT ELECTRODES; SCALAR LOCALIZATION; TEMPORAL BONES; X-RAY; POSITION; ARRAY; CHILDREN; PERIMODIOLAR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1159/000480345
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Aims: The Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant incorporates a new precurved electrode array, i.e., the Slim Modiolar electrode (SME), which is designed to bring electrode contacts close to the medial wall of the cochlea while avoiding trauma due to scalar dislocation or contact with the lateral wall during insertion. The primary aim of this prospective study was to determine the final position of the electrode array in clinical cases as evaluated using flat-panel volume computed tomography. Methods: Forty-five adult candidates for unilateral cochlear implantation were recruited from 8 centers. Eleven surgeons attended a temporal bone workshop and received further training with a transparent plastic cochlear model just prior to the first surgery. Feedback on the surgical approach and use of the SME was collected via a questionnaire for each case. Computed tomography of the temporal bone was performed postoperatively using flat-panel digital volume tomography or cone beam systems. The primary measure was the final scalar position of the SME (completely in scala tympani or not). Secondly, medial-lateral position and insertion depth were evaluated. Results: Forty-four subjects received a CI532. The SME was located completely in scala tympani for all subjects. Pure round window (44% of the cases), extended round window (22%), and inferior and/or anterior cochleostomy (34%) approaches were successful across surgeons and cases. The SME was generally positioned close to the modiolus. Overinsertion of the array past the first marker tended to push the basal contacts towards the lateral wall and served only to increase the insertion depth of the first electrode contact without increasing the insertion depth of the most apical electrode. Complications were limited to tip fold-overs encountered in 2 subjects; both were attributed to surgical error, with both reimplanted successfully. Conclusions: The new Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant with SME achieved the design goal of producing little or no trauma as indicated by consistent scala tympani placement. Surgeons should be carefully trained to use the new deployment method such that tip fold-overs and over insertion may be avoided. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 179
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus C1532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK
    Serrano, Manuel Gomez
    Patel, Sharmila
    Harris, Robert
    Selvadurai, David
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 20 (04) : 207 - 216
  • [2] Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience
    Cuda, Domenico
    Murri, Alessandra
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (12) : 4141 - 4148
  • [3] Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience
    Domenico Cuda
    Alessandra Murri
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 4141 - 4148
  • [4] REVIEW OF ELECTRODE PLACEMENT WITH THE SLIM MODIOLAR ELECTRODE: IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT
    Balazs Dimak
    Roland Nagy
    Adam Perenyi
    Janos Andras Jarabin
    Rebeka Schulcz
    Miklos Csanady
    Jozsef Jori
    Laszlo Rovo
    Jozsef Geza Kiss
    IDEGGYOGYASZATI SZEMLE-CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 73 (1-2): : 53 - 59
  • [5] Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation
    Kay-Rivest, Emily
    Winchester, Arianna
    McMenomey, Sean O.
    Jethanamest, Daniel
    Roland Jr, J. Thomas
    Friedmann, David R.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2023, 44 (03): : 566 - 571
  • [6] Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array
    Roland, Nagy
    Andras, Jarabin Janos
    Balazs, Dimak
    Adam, Perenyi
    Ferenc, Toth
    Viktoria, Szuts
    Jozsef, Jori
    Geza, Kiss Jozsef
    Laszlo, Rovo
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (41) : 1680 - 1688
  • [7] Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode
    Lee, Sang-Yeon
    Han, Jin Hee
    Carandang, Marge
    Bae, Yun Jung
    Choi, Byung Yoon
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [8] Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode
    Sang-Yeon Lee
    Jin Hee Han
    Marge Carandang
    Yun Jung Bae
    Byung Yoon Choi
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [9] The influence of Slim Modiolar electrode on residual hearing in pediatric patients
    Karolina Haber
    Alexandra Neagu
    Wiesław Konopka
    Katarzyna Amernik
    Dan Cristian Gheorghe
    Maria Drela
    Iwona Wrukowska-Niemczewska
    Józef Mierzwiński
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 2723 - 2732
  • [10] Early Outcomes With a Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array
    McJunkin, Jonathan L.
    Durakovic, Nedim
    Herzog, Jacques
    Buchman, Craig A.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (01) : E28 - E33