Trends in primary treatment for localized prostate cancer according to the availability of treatment modalities and the impact of introducing robotic surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Hori, Shunta [1 ]
Nakai, Yasushi [1 ]
Tomizawa, Mitsuru [1 ]
Morizawa, Yosuke [1 ]
Gotoh, Daisuke [1 ]
Miyake, Makito [1 ]
Anai, Satoshi [1 ]
Torimoto, Kazumasa [1 ]
Yoneda, Tatsuo [1 ]
Fujimoto, Kiyohide [1 ]
Tanaka, Nobumichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nara Med Univ, Dept Urol, 840 Shijo Cho, Kashihara, Nara 6348522, Japan
[2] Nara Med Univ, Dept Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara, Japan
关键词
primary treatment; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; radiotherapy; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/iju.15003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We aimed to investigate the effect of available treatment modalities on primary treatment selection in patients with localized prostate cancer and that of introducing robotic surgery. Methods We retrospectively studied 12 061 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2018 from 21 institutions. These institutions were divided into five groups according to the availability of surgery and radiotherapy. Differences in primary treatment selection between the institutions were investigated, and the predictive factors involved in the selection were explored. Results Surgery, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and active surveillance/watchful waiting were selected as primary treatment in 4115, 3621, 3188, and 821 patients, respectively, while the remaining 316 patients selected other modalities. The number of patients, particularly young patients, was much higher in institutions with both surgery and radiotherapy. With the introduction of robotic surgery, open radical prostatectomy has decreased, and robotic surgery made up approximately 70% of all prostatectomies. Institutions with both surgery and radiotherapy tended to treat patients with very low or low risk by surgery or radiotherapy, while institutions without surgery and radiotherapy tended to select active surveillance or watchful waiting. Multivariate analysis revealed that primary treatment selection for prostate cancer was affected not only by clinical factors, but also by the available modalities in each institution. Conclusions Differences in available treatment modalities affect the selection of primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Introduction of robotic surgery also has a strong influence on the number of patients in each institution.
引用
收藏
页码:1371 / 1379
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of localized cancer of the prostate
    Pommier, P
    EUROCANCER 98, 1998, : 333 - 334
  • [22] Treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Vallancien, Guy
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Rozet, Francois
    Barret, Eric
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2008, 192 (05): : 1021 - 1026
  • [23] Treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Martin Burchardt
    Hartwig Huland
    World Journal of Urology, 2007, 25 : 1 - 2
  • [24] Treatment modalities for localised prostate cancer
    Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin
    Madhavan, Subash Guru
    Kirby, Roger
    Challacombe, Ben
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2012, 3 (02) : 21 - 25
  • [25] Trends in the treatment of localized prostate cancer using supplemented cancer registry data
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    Johnson, Terri Kang
    Hoffman, Richard
    Morrell, Donna
    Deapen, Dennis
    Penson, David F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (04) : 576 - 584
  • [26] Treatment trends and Medicare reimbursements for localized prostate cancer in elderly patients
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Valiquette, Anne Sophie
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Tian, Zhe
    Trudeau, Vincent
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Briganti, Alberto
    Graefen, Markus
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (07): : E338 - E344
  • [27] Definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer: Time and geographic trends.
    Tward, Jonathan D.
    Burt, Lindsay
    Shrieve, Dennis C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [28] Trends in treatment costs for localized prostate cancer - The healthy screenee effect
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Penson, David F.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (02) : 154 - 159
  • [29] CONTEMPORARY NATIONALLY-REPRESENTATIVE TRENDS IN TREATMENT FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Smith, Alexandria
    Odisho, Anobel
    Carroll, Peter
    Litwin, Mark
    Saigal, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E140 - E140
  • [30] QUALITY OF LIFE IMPACT OF PRIMARY TREATMENTS FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITHOUT HORMONAL TREATMENT
    Guedea, F.
    Pardo, Y.
    Aguilo, F.
    Fernandez, P.
    Macias, V.
    Marino, A.
    Hervas Moron, A.
    Herruzo, I.
    Ortiz, M. J.
    Pera, J.
    Gutierrez Miguelez, C.
    Ferrer, F.
    Suarez, J. F.
    Boladeras Inglada, A. M.
    Sancho, G.
    Martinez, E.
    Ferrer, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S119 - S119