Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

被引:90
|
作者
Huang, Ting-Chiao [1 ]
Chang, Hsihui [2 ,3 ]
Chiou, Jeng-Ren [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Peking Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan 701, Taiwan
来源
关键词
audit market concentration; audit fees; audit quality; China; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY EXPERTISE; COMPETITION; SERVICES; COST; NONAUDIT; INCENTIVES; OFFICE; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-51299
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the effects of audit market concentration on audit fees and audit quality in China, where competition is intense and the legal environment is relatively weak compared with developed countries. Analyzing 12,334 firm-year observations for the period 2001 to 2011, we find a significant positive relation between concentration and audit fees. Path analysis shows that concentration improves client earnings quality and reduces the need for auditors to issue modified audit opinions through increased audit fees. Additional analysis indicates that the increased audit fees and client earnings quality resulting from increased concentration are associated with a lower likelihood of executives and auditors being sanctioned by regulators for audit failures. Together, our results suggest that concentration improves audit quality indirectly through increased audit fees and this positive indirect effect offsets the negative direct effect of concentration on audit quality. By separating the direct and the indirect effect of concentration on audit quality, our study would explain why previous studies that do not have a separation document mixed evidence. Our findings inform regulators that actions taken to eliminate the indirect effect of concentration, for example restricting the upper bound of audit fees, could produce unintended outcomes such as decreased audit quality.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 145
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Education Requirements, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality
    Allen, Arthur
    Woodland, Angela
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2010, 29 (02): : 1 - 25
  • [32] The Association between Audit Partner Rotation and Audit Fees: Empirical Evidence from the Australian Market
    Stewart, Jenny
    Kent, Pamela
    Routledge, James
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (01): : 181 - 197
  • [33] Mandatory audit rotation and audit market concentration-evidence from Poland
    Indyk, Magdalena
    ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019, 5 (04) : 90 - 111
  • [34] Relative audit fees and client loyalty in the audit market
    Farag, Magdy
    Elias, Rafik
    ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2011, 24 (01) : 79 - +
  • [35] AUDIT MARKET CONCENTRATION - EVIDENCE FROM CROATIA
    Malis, Sanja Sever
    Brozovic, Mateja
    EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2015, 28 (02): : 339 - 356
  • [36] The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit fees and non-audit service fees: Evidence from Australia
    Ali, Muhammad Jahangir
    Singh, Rajbans Kaur Shingara
    Al-Akra, Mahmoud
    ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (02) : 174 - 191
  • [37] Audit fees, audit seasonality and audit quality in Nigeria: a mediation analysis
    Ayoola, Tajudeen John
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2022,
  • [38] Audit quality and audit size: Evidence from auditor mergers in China
    Zhan, Jun
    Her, Young-Won
    Chen, Keji
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 31 (03): : 170 - 184
  • [39] The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Koh, Kevin
    Li, Li
    Liu, Xuejiao
    Wang, Chunfei
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 59 (01): : 340 - 380
  • [40] Product market competition and audit fees: evidence from an emerging market
    Chen, Hanwen
    Xing, Liquan
    Zhou, Haiyan
    ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2020, 28 (01) : 89 - 109