Environmental costs and mitigation potential in plastic-greenhouse pepper production system in China: A life cycle assessment

被引:41
|
作者
Wang, Xiaozhong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Bin [1 ]
Wu, Gang [4 ]
Sun, Yixiang [4 ]
Guo, Xisheng [4 ]
Jin, Zhenghui [5 ]
Xu, Weining [5 ]
Zhao, Yongzhi [6 ]
Zhang, Fusuo [1 ]
Zou, Chunqin [1 ]
Chen, Xinping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Ctr Resources Environm & Food Secur, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Acad Agr Sci, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China
[4] Anhui Acad Agr Sci, Soil & Fertilizer Res Inst, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China
[5] Anhui Sierte Fertilizer Ind Co Ltd, Ningguo 242300, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Soil Fertilizer Extens Serv Stn, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Pepper; Plastic-greenhouse; Environmental impact gap; Yield gap; GAS EMISSIONS; CROPPING SYSTEMS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; TOMATO PRODUCTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; MAIZE PRODUCTION; NITROUS-OXIDE; YIELD GAPS; ENERGY; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.013
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Intensive vegetable system is commonly considered as high environmental costs due to high inputs, thus quantifying the mitigation potential of various environmental impacts, and developing strategies to improve the sustainability of this system was critical. Here we used partial life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of a plastic-greenhouse pepper production system in China, and then employed an environmental impact gap methodology to analyze the mitigation potential of various environmental impacts and to establish better management strategy. The results showed that the global warming, acidification, eutrophication potentials and energy depletion of 160 farm-gate analysis were in average of 6.4 metric tons CO2-eq ha(-1), 54.5 kg SO2-eq ha(-1), 50.9 kg PO4-eq ha -1 , and 57.3 GJ ha(-1), respectively. Fertilizer accounted for 64.4%, 78.6% and 97.9% for the global warming, acidification, and eutrophication potential, respectively, while structural materials for greenhouse accounted for 58.6% of the total energy depletion. Based on analysis of yield gap and environmental impact gap by survey date grouping, the results showed that the pepper yield of the 1st quartile (best 25%) was 26.6% higher compared to the mean of all 160 farmer yields due to better nutrient and crop management. And at meantime, on per metric ton of pepper production, the global warming, acidification, eutrophication potentials and energy depletion were lower by 23.9%, 25.0%, 25.7%, and 23.2% in this system, respectively. In conclusion, the integrated nutrient-crop management strategies based on best famers' practices could close the gap of environmental impacts significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 194
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental Impact of Greenhouse Tomato Production Strategies Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Parrado, C. A.
    Bojaca, C. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TOMATO IN THE TROPICS, 2009, 821 : 125 - 131
  • [22] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of titanium dioxide production in China
    Dai, Yue
    Dong, Huijuan
    Sun, Luxuan
    Li, Jinze
    Zhang, Tianyu
    Geng, Yong
    Liu, Zhe
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 105
  • [23] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of green tea production in China
    Sun, Mengqi
    Jia, Xuexiu
    Yang, Dong
    Lu, Bin
    Han, Feng
    Shi, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [24] Assessing the economic and environmental impact of jasmine rice production: Life cycle assessment and Life Cycle Costs analysis
    Jirapornvaree, Ittisak
    Suppadit, Tawadchai
    Kumar, Vikas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 303
  • [25] Potential pathways to reduce environmental impact in a greenhouse tomato production: Life cycle assessment for different irrigation and fertilization treatments
    Fan, Yaqiong
    Luo, Zhaofu
    Hao, Xinmei
    Li, Sien
    Kang, Shaozhong
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2022, 305
  • [26] Tool to incorporate environmental costs into Life Cycle Assessment
    Kumaran, SD
    Ong, SK
    Tan, RBH
    Nee, AYC
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS MANUFACTURING, 2001, 4193 : 124 - 134
  • [27] Global Warming Potential, Variable Costs, and Water Use of a Model Greenhouse Production System for 11.4-cm Annual Plants Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Ingram, Dewayne L.
    Hall, Charles R.
    Knight, Joshua
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2018, 53 (04) : 441 - 444
  • [28] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of borax and boric acid production in China
    An, Jing
    Xue, Xiangxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 66 : 121 - 127
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emission from the dairy production system — review
    Arunasalam Singaravadivelan
    Patil B. Sachin
    S. Harikumar
    Periyasamy Vijayakumar
    M. V. Vindhya
    F. M. Beegum Farhana
    K. K. Rameesa
    Joseph Mathew
    [J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2023, 55
  • [30] Impact of energy flow optimization on the mitigation of environmental consequences and costs in greenhouse cucumber production
    Farshad Soheilifard
    Morteza Taki
    Rosalie van Zelm
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 8421 - 8433