Communication Policies and the Protection of Pluralism in the European Union and the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Bas, Juan Jose [1 ]
Segovia, Ana I. [2 ]
Llorens, Carles
Almiron, Nuria [4 ]
Grau, Helena P. [3 ]
Candel, Roberto Suarez [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fac Humanities & Commun Sci, CEU Cardenal Herrera, Alfara Del Patriarca 46115, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Informat Sci, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Fac Commun Sci, Image Sound & Synth Res Grp GRISS, Bellaterra 08193, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Pompeu Fabra Univ, Fac Commun, Barcelona 08018, Spain
[5] Hans Bredow Inst Media Res, D-20257 Hamburg, Germany
来源
COMUNICACION Y SOCIEDAD | 2011年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
Communication policies; pluralism; audience concentration; United States; European Union; MEDIA CONCENTRATION; DIVERSITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article describes and analyses the regulatory frameworks and the current pluralism protection policies in the United States and several countries of the European Union (Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain). The data obtained allowed a qualitative assessment to be carried out, through a comparative analysis, in order to identify certain similarities and some significant differences. Thus, it was found that pluralism protection is a common denominator in the communication policies of these countries. However, regulatory and legislative differences depend on social, geographical and media contexts, and time variations in the application of policies depend on audiovisual media market liberalisation processes.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 75
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The United States and the European Union
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INTERESTS, 2005, 27 (06) : 531 - 533
  • [12] Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union and Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States
    Udo E. Simonis
    [J]. Environmentalist, 2004, 24 (3): : 199 - 201
  • [13] Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health: A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States
    Bhasale, Alice L.
    Sarpatwari, Ameet
    De Bruin, Marie L.
    Lexchin, Joel
    Lopert, Ruth
    Bahri, Priya
    Mintzes, Barbara J.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 109 (06) : 1424 - 1442
  • [14] The communication of corporate social responsibility: United states and European union multinational corporations
    Hartman, Laura P.
    Rubin, Robert S.
    Dhanda, K. Kathy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 74 (04) : 373 - 389
  • [15] The Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations
    Laura P. Hartman
    Robert S. Rubin
    K. Kathy Dhanda
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, 74 : 373 - 389
  • [16] The agricultural subsidies in international trade: the policies adopted by the European Union and the United States of America
    Rodrigues Bruno, Flavio Marcelo
    Zago de Azevedo, Andre Filipe
    Massuquetti, Angelica
    [J]. CIENCIA RURAL, 2012, 42 (04): : 757 - 764
  • [17] Analysis of the Latest Progress of Methane Emissions Reduction Policies in the European Union and the United States
    Ran Ze
    [J]. China Oil & Gas, 2023, 30 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [18] Overview of Current Microgrid Policies, Incentives and Barriers in the European Union, United States and China
    Ali, Amjad
    Li, Wuhua
    Hussain, Rashid
    He, Xiangning
    Williams, Barry W.
    Memon, Abdul Hameed
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
  • [19] The foreign policies of European Union member states
    Fanes, JVI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2001, 39 (03): : 571 - 571
  • [20] The foreign policies of European Union Member States
    Brighi, E
    [J]. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2001, 30 (02): : 447 - 449