Reliability of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detecting HER-2 gene status in breast cancer:: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization and assessment of interobserver reproducibility

被引:55
|
作者
Gong, Y [1 ]
Gilcrease, M [1 ]
Sneige, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Unit 53, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
HER-2; breast carcinoma; chromogenic in situ hybridization; fluorescence in situ hybridization; interobserver; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.3800432
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Accurate determination of HER-2 status is important in the management of patients with breast cancer, especially in determining their eligibility for trastuzumab therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization ( FISH) has been regarded as the gold standard method for detecting HER-2 gene amplification. Recently, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in which HER-2 is detected by a peroxidase reaction and the gene copies are determined by regular bright-field microscopy, has emerged as a potential alternative to FISH. However, this method requires validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated 80 cases of invasive breast carcinoma by CISH, compared the results with those obtained by FISH, and assessed interobserver reproducibility among three observers. We found that agreement among the three pathologists on the CISH-determined HER-2 status was achieved in 73 cases (91%), all of which had results matching the corresponding FISH results: 54 nonamplified and 19 amplified. Of the 19 amplified cases, 13 were scored unanimously as high-level amplification; six had a minor scoring discrepancy (ie, low-level vs high-level amplification). A major scoring discrepancy ( ie, nonamplification vs amplification) was found in the remaining seven cases, three of which were amplified and four of which were nonamplified by FISH. Two of the latter cases had a polysomy of chromosome 17. The cases that caused scoring difficulty were those with an equivocal or borderline signal number against a high background. Overall, there was nearly perfect agreement between the CISH and corresponding FISH results, and interpretation of CISH results were highly reproducible among the three pathologists. We conclude that, in general, HER-2 status can be reliably assessed by CISH. Confirmatory FISH is recommended in cases with equivocal or borderline CISH copy numbers.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER-2 status in routine practice
    Dolan, M
    Snover, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 123 (05) : 766 - 770
  • [22] Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER-2 status in routine practice
    Egervari, K
    Szollosi, Z
    Nemes, Z
    Kaczur, V
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 125 (01) : 155 - 156
  • [23] Chromogenic in situ hybridization -: A practical alternative for fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival breast cancer samples
    Tanner, M
    Gancberg, D
    Di Leo, A
    Larsimont, D
    Rouas, G
    Piccart, MJ
    Isola, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2000, 157 (05): : 1467 - 1472
  • [24] HER-2/neu gene amplification status in prostate cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Ross, JS
    Sheehan, C
    HaynerBuchan, AM
    Ambros, RA
    Kallakury, BVS
    Kaufman, R
    Fisher, HAG
    Muraca, PJ
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1997, 28 (07) : 827 - 833
  • [25] Interlaboratory comparison of HER-2 oncogene amplification as detected by chromogenic and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Isola, J
    Tanner, M
    Forsyth, A
    Cooke, TG
    Watters, AD
    Bartlett, JMS
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (14) : 4793 - 4798
  • [26] Comparison of dual-colour chromogenic in-situ hybridization and fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast carcinoma
    Conlon, Susan
    Colgan, Aoife
    Allen, David
    O'Grady, Anthony
    Kay, Elaine W.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 58 (02) : 320 - 321
  • [27] Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer
    Jacobs, TW
    Gown, AM
    Yaziji, H
    Barnes, MJ
    Schnitt, SJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (07) : 1974 - 1982
  • [28] Comparison of Silver-Enhanced in situ Hybridization and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinomas
    Kang, Jun
    Kwon, Gui Young
    Lee, Young-Hee
    Gong, Gyungyub
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2009, 12 (04) : 235 - 240
  • [29] Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: Comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
    Kiyose, Shinichiro
    Igarashi, Hisaki
    Nagura, Kiyoko
    Kamo, Takaharu
    Kawane, Kazunori
    Mori, Hiroki
    Ozawa, Takachika
    Maeda, Matsuyoshi
    Konno, Keisuke
    Hoshino, Hideaki
    Konno, Hiroyuki
    Ogura, Hiroyuki
    Shinmura, Kazuya
    Hattori, Naohiko
    Sugimura, Haruhiko
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 62 (11) : 728 - 734
  • [30] The correlation between dual colour chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization in assessing HER2 gene status
    Pedersen, Marianne
    Rasmussen, Birgitte Bruun
    APMIS, 2008, 116 (03) : 250 - 250