Reliability of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detecting HER-2 gene status in breast cancer:: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization and assessment of interobserver reproducibility

被引:55
|
作者
Gong, Y [1 ]
Gilcrease, M [1 ]
Sneige, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Unit 53, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
HER-2; breast carcinoma; chromogenic in situ hybridization; fluorescence in situ hybridization; interobserver; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.3800432
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Accurate determination of HER-2 status is important in the management of patients with breast cancer, especially in determining their eligibility for trastuzumab therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization ( FISH) has been regarded as the gold standard method for detecting HER-2 gene amplification. Recently, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in which HER-2 is detected by a peroxidase reaction and the gene copies are determined by regular bright-field microscopy, has emerged as a potential alternative to FISH. However, this method requires validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated 80 cases of invasive breast carcinoma by CISH, compared the results with those obtained by FISH, and assessed interobserver reproducibility among three observers. We found that agreement among the three pathologists on the CISH-determined HER-2 status was achieved in 73 cases (91%), all of which had results matching the corresponding FISH results: 54 nonamplified and 19 amplified. Of the 19 amplified cases, 13 were scored unanimously as high-level amplification; six had a minor scoring discrepancy (ie, low-level vs high-level amplification). A major scoring discrepancy ( ie, nonamplification vs amplification) was found in the remaining seven cases, three of which were amplified and four of which were nonamplified by FISH. Two of the latter cases had a polysomy of chromosome 17. The cases that caused scoring difficulty were those with an equivocal or borderline signal number against a high background. Overall, there was nearly perfect agreement between the CISH and corresponding FISH results, and interpretation of CISH results were highly reproducible among the three pathologists. We conclude that, in general, HER-2 status can be reliably assessed by CISH. Confirmatory FISH is recommended in cases with equivocal or borderline CISH copy numbers.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) for assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer
    Bhargava, R
    Lal, P
    Salazar, PA
    Chen, B
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 6 (02): : 151 - 151
  • [2] Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene status in breast cancer by chromogenic in situ hybridization: Comparison with immunohistochemistry
    Kounelis, S
    Kapranos, N
    Malamos, N
    Kokka, E
    Arvanitis, H
    Kouri, E
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2003, 83 (01) : 37A - 37A
  • [3] Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene status in breast cancer by chromogenic in situ hybridization: Comparison with immunohistochemistry
    Kounelis, S
    Kapranos, N
    Malamos, N
    Kokka, E
    Arvanitis, H
    Kouri, E
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (01) : 37A - 37A
  • [4] Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her-2/neu-oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Mayr, Doris
    Heim, Sibylle
    Weyrauch, Kerstin
    Zeindl-Eberhart, Evelyn
    Kunz, Anne
    Engel, Jutta
    Kirchner, Thomas
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [5] HER2 status in breast carcinomas: comparison between silver in situ hybridization, chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Ali, S. A. Md
    Nurhayati, H. M.
    Munirah, M. A.
    Reena, M. Z.
    Masir, N.
    Chandramaya, S. F.
    Rohaizak, M.
    Asmiati, A.
    Sharifah, N. A.
    Rafie, M. K.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (05): : 185 - 185
  • [6] Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for assessment of HER-2 status in breast cancer patients
    Lin Wang
    Xiaobei Wang
    Xiu Nie
    Ling Ma
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2009, 29 : 354 - 358
  • [7] Comparison of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry for Assessment of HER-2 Status in Breast Cancer Patients
    Wang, Lin
    Wang, Xiaobei
    Nie, Xiu
    Ma, Ling
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 29 (03) : 354 - 358
  • [8] Comparison of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry for Assessment of HER-2 Status in Breast Cancer Patients
    王琳
    王晓蓓
    聂秀
    马玲
    Current Medical Science, 2009, 29 (03) : 354 - 358
  • [9] Comparison of fluorescence and chromogenic in situ hybridization for detection of HER-2/neu oncogene in breast cancer
    Gupta, D
    Middleton, LP
    Whitaker, MJ
    Abrams, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 119 (03) : 381 - 387
  • [10] Comparison between immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization in assessing HER-2 status in breast cancer
    Todorovic-Rakovic, N
    Jovanovic, D
    Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z
    Nikolic-Vukosavljevic, D
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 55 (06) : 318 - 323