Reduction of energy consumption in process plants using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis

被引:35
|
作者
Mirza, Sohail [1 ]
机构
[1] Somicon AG, Membrane & Proc Technol, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
energy recovery; process plants; nanofiltration; reverse osmosis; hydraulic pressure booster; turbo-charger;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2007.04.084
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Pressure driven membrane processes are characterized by their low specific energy consumption. Since they constitute a mechanical separation without phase or temperature change, they are least energy intensive. This study focused on further energy reduction. Process industries (chemical, food, mechanical) use numerous membrane processes where the concentrate stream is throttled to reduce the membrane pressure. Significant energy losses are incurred there. Examples of such processes are; de-salting and concentration of fine chemicals, de-mineralization and concentration of cheese whey, purification of sugar and wastewater treatment. Highest losses occur in typical batch processes, whereas semi-batch and continuous plants are energetically more efficient. The use of energy recovery systems is well known in the seawater RO industry. This study looked at all the existing technologies available today. They include pressure exchangers of various kinds, Francis type turbines, Pelton turbines and hydraulic pressure boosters (turbochargers). Several existing plants including simple batch, simple batch with feed and bleed and continuous plants were analyzed to evaluate the use of such devices. Returns on investment were also estimated. It was found that only hydraulic pressure boosters (turbochargers) are suitable for process applications. They are compact, maintenance free and are available in sizes typically encountered in the process plants. Integration into new plants as well as retrofit of existing plants is possible. Depending on the process, an investment in the energy saving system can be recovered within a period from 6-24 months at the current European energy prices.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 142
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behaviour of the asynchronous electric motors to reduction of energy consumption in reverse osmosis plants
    Sadhwani, JJ
    Déniz, F
    DESALINATION, 2003, 157 (1-3) : 1 - 8
  • [2] Specific energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants using machine learning
    Wang, Chen
    Wang, Li
    Dong, Linyinxue
    Shon, Ho Kyong
    Kim, Jungbin
    DESALINATION, 2025, 602
  • [3] A comprehensive review of energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants
    Kim, Jungbin
    Park, Kiho
    Yang, Dae Ryook
    Hong, Seungkwan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 254
  • [4] Reduction of energy consumption in seawater reverse osmosis desalination pilot plant by using energy recovery devices
    Kim, Youngmin
    Kang, Man Gon
    Lee, Sangho
    Jeon, Sang Gyu
    Choi, June-Seok
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (4-6) : 766 - 771
  • [5] Energy consumption and recovery in reverse osmosis
    Gude, Veera Gnaneswar
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 36 (1-3) : 239 - 260
  • [6] Membrane performance in tetracycline removal process by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis
    Li, Weiying
    Lu, Hui
    Li, Pingbo
    Shi, Tiantian
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2013, 41 (05): : 735 - 741
  • [7] Recovery of copper from process waters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis
    Csefalvay, Edit
    Pauer, Viktor
    Mizsey, Peter
    DESALINATION, 2009, 240 (1-3) : 132 - 142
  • [8] Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis in winemaking
    Massot, A.
    Mietton-Peuchot, M.
    Peuchot, C.
    Milisic, V.
    DESALINATION, 2008, 231 (1-3) : 283 - 289
  • [9] Dyeing process wastewater treatment using fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Kim, In-Chul
    Lee, Kew-Ho
    DESALINATION, 2006, 192 (1-3) : 246 - 251
  • [10] Energy Consumption and Gypsum Scaling Assessment in a Hybrid Nanofiltration-Reverse Osmosis-Electrodialysis system
    Turek, Marian
    Mitko, Krzysztof
    Laskowska, Ewa
    Chorazewska, Marzena
    Piotrowski, Krzysztof
    Jakobik-Kolon, Agata
    Dydo, Piotr
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 41 (02) : 392 - 400